So you're on the highway it's an interstate, a US Route, a state highway, whatever. It's a stretch where the speed limit is the maximum for your state/type of road it is and it'll likely remain this speed for a good long while. (I.E. if it's a state highway or a route it won't go through a town any time soon where the speed will drop down to 65 on the skirts and then a much lower speed through town.)
So, if your car is so-equipped and you're like many people you'll probably set the Cruise Control for the speed you want to go, right? It saves a little on gas (the car can keep the speed steadier and manage the fuel better than your foot can) and you can rest your foot some.
Or do you?
I was driving home tonight along a long stretch of state highway (speedlimit: 70, I was going 75) I had the cruise set but I don't rest my foot on the floorboard of the car the entire time. I, instead, just rest it on the break pedal. Just enough so that my shin and heel don't get tired too quick but not so much as to activate the brake (thus de-activating the Cruise Control.)
Now there are times when my foot does get a bit tired so I do rest it flat on the floor of the car for a moment but then it goes right back onto the brake. I do this to reduce the "reaction time" between me seeing an obstacle in the road (say someone suddenly entering my lane, a deer running across the road) or some other emergency (like a blow-out) where I'd need to brake.
My buddy was watching me do this and asked me why I didn't just completely rest my foot, I explained to him that I want to have a shorter reaction time. It'd take longer for my foot to get off the floor, to the brake and press it than it would for me to simply hit the brake. He sort-of waved this off and said, that that half-second it'd take me to move my foot wouldn't make much difference.
I disagree.
So, what do you do when using the cruise. Do you cover the brake, or do your rest your foot flat on the floor?
So, if your car is so-equipped and you're like many people you'll probably set the Cruise Control for the speed you want to go, right? It saves a little on gas (the car can keep the speed steadier and manage the fuel better than your foot can) and you can rest your foot some.
Or do you?
I was driving home tonight along a long stretch of state highway (speedlimit: 70, I was going 75) I had the cruise set but I don't rest my foot on the floorboard of the car the entire time. I, instead, just rest it on the break pedal. Just enough so that my shin and heel don't get tired too quick but not so much as to activate the brake (thus de-activating the Cruise Control.)
Now there are times when my foot does get a bit tired so I do rest it flat on the floor of the car for a moment but then it goes right back onto the brake. I do this to reduce the "reaction time" between me seeing an obstacle in the road (say someone suddenly entering my lane, a deer running across the road) or some other emergency (like a blow-out) where I'd need to brake.
My buddy was watching me do this and asked me why I didn't just completely rest my foot, I explained to him that I want to have a shorter reaction time. It'd take longer for my foot to get off the floor, to the brake and press it than it would for me to simply hit the brake. He sort-of waved this off and said, that that half-second it'd take me to move my foot wouldn't make much difference.
I disagree.
So, what do you do when using the cruise. Do you cover the brake, or do your rest your foot flat on the floor?