• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Ghostbusters 2016: Talk about the movie(s).

Looks like I'd expect from what we've seen so far and it has a nice slick sheen. My whole problem with the "all-female cast" was that seemed to be the sole selling point so I don't know why people are disappointed that what was delivered: Ghostbusters...with an all-female cast.

As far as the whole Winston thing goes the trailer does show the Leslie Jones character proactively joining the group and Ecto-1 and saving the day so there's some signs she's more than hired help. And being over-the-top is her bread-and-butter, one wouldn't expect Bill Murray not to be deadpan or Gilbert Gottfried not to be annoying and so on.
 
I hope the movie is funnier than the trailer. It very well may be, it can be difficult to make a funny trailer when you lose so much context for the jokes. But I didn't laugh once at this.
Me neither. But the comedy seems to be a little more gross out comedy which is not my thing.
 
Does it make sense if I say the new team seems too comedic?

No, it makes sense. Which I guess goes with the "tone" it's aiming for. Something closer to "MIB" or even Ghostbusters 2 as opposed to the original movie. The original movie had its moments of comedy, but it didn't border on goofball broadness like what is seen in this trailer. These guys were clowns but you also bought them as professional men with doctorates able to pull all of this together.
 
I just really hope they didn't spoil the movie by showing us *all* the ghosts already.

This did make me realize that there weren't many individual ghosts on screen in the original at all. Aside from the scene with all the balls/streaks of light, there was:
  1. Librarian
  2. Slimer
  3. Subway ghost
  4. Dream sequence ghost (technically not a "real" ghost)
  5. Taxi driver zombie/skeleton
  6. Terror Dogs (Zuul & Vinz Klortho)
  7. Gozer 1 (supermodel with the flat top)
  8. Gozer 2 (Stay Puft - for the longest time I thought this was a separate entity from Gozer)
Any I missed?
Nope, I'm pretty sure that's all of them. Less than ten...that's waaaaay less than Ghostbusters 2, which has more than 1500 ghosts in it. (Thanks mostly to the Titanic finally arriving.) ;)
 
It's funny but the dream sequence Ghost was nearly a real ghost, it's just that they cut that entire sequence and it ended up as a short bit in the first Montage.

Both of the Ghostbusters films are films that have a wealth of deleted scenes that ended up being merely glimpsed in the montages.
 
I loved the 1st film but hated the 2nd film, and wasn't rooting for another film, but after this trailer I'm stoked to see this one.
 
Looks like I'd expect from what we've seen so far and it has a nice slick sheen. My whole problem with the "all-female cast" was that seemed to be the sole selling point so I don't know why people are disappointed that what was delivered: Ghostbusters...with an all-female cast.

It was never the sole selling point -- it was just the part that the media and the idiot fanboys online obsessed over to the point that it drowned out everything else in the conversation. Never mistake the media's kneejerk fixations for reality. Always look beyond the hype and the headlines for what's being buried under the noise.

I mean, I'm not too familiar with any of these actresses, but I gather they're four of the top comedy talents in the industry today. That should absolutely be a selling point in its own right. And I've heard a lot of praise for Paul Feig as a director, though I'm unfamiliar with his work.


As far as the whole Winston thing goes the trailer does show the Leslie Jones character proactively joining the group and Ecto-1 and saving the day so there's some signs she's more than hired help.

It's not about that. It's just that, as great as it is to see female scientist-heroes in a major motion picture, it'd be even better if the scientists weren't all white. The more non-white-male scientist role models there are in the media, the more it promotes greater inclusion in STEM fields in the long term.


And being over-the-top is her bread-and-butter, one wouldn't expect Bill Murray not to be deadpan or Gilbert Gottfried not to be annoying and so on.

That reminds me -- there was a time when Comedy Central (or was it still called The Comedy Channel then?) was showing reruns of Saturday Night Live episodes (I think), and they showed the occasional sketch that featured Gilbert Gottfried before he settled into his loud, abrasive persona, and I was surprised to discover how soft-spoken he could be. I hadn't realized that his famous grating voice is an act, a character he plays.



No, it makes sense. Which I guess goes with the "tone" it's aiming for. Something closer to "MIB" or even Ghostbusters 2 as opposed to the original movie. The original movie had its moments of comedy, but it didn't border on goofball broadness like what is seen in this trailer. These guys were clowns but you also bought them as professional men with doctorates able to pull all of this together.

Remember how the teaser trailer last month made it look like an intense action thriller and didn't contain a single bit of humor? Trailers do not accurately represent the tone of the films they promote. Usually a film has several trailers that each emphasize a different facet of the film -- one may play up the action while another plays up the humor, and so forth.
 
No, it makes sense. Which I guess goes with the "tone" it's aiming for. Something closer to "MIB" or even Ghostbusters 2 as opposed to the original movie. The original movie had its moments of comedy, but it didn't border on goofball broadness like what is seen in this trailer. These guys were clowns but you also bought them as professional men with doctorates able to pull all of this together.

Yeah I agree the characters and tone does seem quite a bit wackier and slapstickier than in the original. But who knows, I do really like these comedians and Feig's approach might end up working just as well in the end, so guess we'll just have to wait and see.

One thing's for sure, it's definitely not worth all the outrage and ridicule that's being aimed at it by childish and sexist fanboys online (who are unfortunately starting to make Ghostbusters fans as a whole look really bad).
 
It was never the sole selling point -- it was just the part that the media and the idiot fanboys online obsessed over to the point that it drowned out everything else in the conversation. Never mistake the media's kneejerk fixations for reality. Always look beyond the hype and the headlines for what's being buried under the noise.

I mean, I'm not too familiar with any of these actresses, but I gather they're four of the top comedy talents in the industry today. That should absolutely be a selling point in its own right. And I've heard a lot of praise for Paul Feig as a director, though I'm unfamiliar with his work.

I'm talking when this was first announced and the eventual casting wasn't known. All that was known was Feig and all-female team. This was announced even before the script was written.
 
And on a nicer note, this even got Feig's thumbs up on Twitter:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I'd like to point something out regarding this trailer that may be getting lost in all this worry over the intense dislike that it has apparently gotten online.

Less than 24 hours ago, Sony premiered the trailer in California in front of a group of press people and a large contingent of die-hard Ghostbusters fans, all of whom received it with great enthusiasm, to the point that they asked to see it again once it had finished airing.

I doubt that opinions changed that dramatically in less than 24 hours, so I really don't think there's anything to be concerned about relative to the film's success based solely on an apparently overwhelming negative online response to the trailer.
 
Saw the trailer; thought it was okay. I did chuckle at a couple of jokes but there were definitely spots where I thought, "They could've stuck a funnier joke there." I may actually see this movie solely on the basis of Leslie Jones, who appeared in the SNL Episode 7 Auditions sketch made up as a Klingon. that was the first time in a long time that I've laughed at a joke on SNL. She appears at about the 3:36 mark:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I've stewed about this trailer for a few hours, and I can say I'm cautiously excited to see it. Ghostbusters is my all-time favorite movie, and Ghostbusters II, which I enjoy on the whole (although a lot less than the original) still brings a smile to my face. At first, I thought the tone seemed a little too slapstick (sort of the same problem I have with GBII ) but I'm willing to give it the benefit of the doubt as I love all things Ghostbusters (except Extreme Ghostbusters). I think Paul Feig's movies are funny and I love Kristen Wiig and Kate McKinnon. Melissa McCarthy I just have to be in a certain mood to watch.

I'm keeping an open mind because they're not doing blatant ripoffs of the original characters. In my mind, you could never replace Ramis as Spengler, Murray as Venkman, Aykroyd as Stantz or Hudson as Zeddemore. Hell, you can't even replace Rick Moranis, Annie Potts, Sigourney Weaver or William Atherton. So I'm glad they're not even attempting to try it. I expect this to be enjoyable (if a little goofy) reimagining that'll make me want to go home and watch the original two. Sort of like the RoboCop remake. It was good for a viewing, but I'll stick with the Peter Weller original, thanks.

I'm kind of curious about whether or not they'll stick with the Ray Parker, Jr. theme song or have someone do a cover of it.
 
I'm not sure about the one-key-at-a-time version of the Ghostbusters theme. It feels like an attempt to give GB a serious edge that it doesn't really have.

One thing I flat out didn't like was that the trailer, at first, is trying to sell this new movie like it's a sequel to the previous two. Every indication we've had is that it's a reboot.
 
I don't know if I've already said this here, but according to Paul Feig, they included a mention of the previous films in the trailer because they had done some trailer tests involving trailers that had the mention included and trailers that didn't, and the trailers that did include the mention tested better than those that didn't.
 
Yeah, the trailer does try to portray the film as an extension to the real GB, but maybe it might be after all. The filmmakers were hiding it to avoid questions about Venkman, Steadmore, and the rest. It's good sign it may be good.
 
Yeah, the trailer does try to portray the film as an extension to the real GB, but maybe it might be after all. The filmmakers were hiding it to avoid questions about Venkman, Steadmore, and the rest. It's good sign it may be good.

The film is a straight-up reboot. This has been repeatedly stated, and was reiterated just yesterday during the world trailer premiere in California even as said trailer mentioned the previous films in its opening text.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top