Ridiculous theoretical assertion about the plot of the new movie stated in completely neutral tone. Sexual innuendo. Reference to reviving one of Trek's most reviled features. Inflamatory suggestion made as though it were completely reasonable. Sexual innuendo. Nebulous threat against the producers of the film if my ideas are not implemented. Promise of boycott unless the film follows my ludicrous paradigm. Invitation for supporting opinions, statement that anyone who disagrees with me is of questionable sanity.