• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

General Trek Questions and Observations

To be fair, 101 of those in your 1st group were made between 1966 & 1974, 8 years of the 1st generation. The other 615 were made between 1987 & 2004, 17 years of the 2nd generation. (Piggybacking on the 8 years of success of the TOS film franchise)

However, to compare 5 year stretches between the 2nd & 3rd gens... between January 1993 to December 1997 Star Trek released 255 episodes with 3 different shows, actually airing on television in syndication, & not just a single company's content streaming service, & were also into production on the 3rd TNG theatrical film. That imho was as much or more of a content boom & commercial blitz as this current 5 year stretch has been
You're probably right about which section of the past several decades really shows the uptick of Trek production. My fascination was the fact that the time between ENT and DIS is almost the same length as the time between TAS and TNG. And in those times, we got at least 3 movies but obviously no shows.
 
I posted about this in another thread but why would Section 31 need stockpiles of nanites aboard their starships? Leland had a pile of them on hand that got out of control.. :razz:

I mean did every ship in their fleet have them or just his, and why just his?
 
I posted about this in another thread but why would Section 31 need stockpiles of nanites aboard their starships? Leland had a pile of them on hand that got out of control.. :razz:

I mean did every ship in their fleet have them or just his, and why just his?
Couldn't Control have just added it to ship invoices?
 
Couldn't Control have just added it to ship invoices?

Possibly but it's a bit of a sore point for me even though. It would imply that it had some kind of ulterior motive for doing such a thing, in the novels it's a bit more evil and does more planning ahead of the humans but it shows planning in the TV show version even before the squid probe upgrades it a bit. It was bad all along.
 
Possibly but it's a bit of a sore point for me even though. It would imply that it had some kind of ulterior motive for doing such a thing, in the novels it's a bit more evil and does more planning ahead of the humans but it shows planning in the TV show version even before the squid probe upgrades it a bit. It was bad all along.
I always took it as bad. Kind of like Ultron.
 
Jonathan Frakes said in an interview that he considers Discovery to be his current "home" Trek series. In other words, the one that he hasn't actually appeared in... yet. ;)

Time Travel ..... I'm calling it now somehow Riker ends up in the future, or as a hologram in the future.
 
Or just a sneak cameo, like he did in "Clockstoppers". But yeah, a hologram of Riker would be way better.

Maybe it could even be Tom Riker, who escaped Cardassian custody and went on to become an admiral or something.
 
Or just a sneak cameo, like he did in "Clockstoppers". But yeah, a hologram of Riker would be way better.

Maybe it could even be Tom Riker, who escaped Cardassian custody and went on to become an admiral or something.

Yes.. Either idea works but I missed the cameo in clockstoppers.

I always got the feeling they used that TOS episode with the sped up aliens as the idea for that movie and I like the movie, does that make me a bad person?

Oh and lead actress was 28 in that movie playing a teen.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top