"Were No Man Has Gone Before" seems to have something of a mixed message when it comes to the fate of Gary Mitchell.
On the one hand, the episode discusses the issue of abolute power and corruption. The idea being that Mitchell's attitude was a direct result of his access to extraordinary levels of power. However, the end of the episode has Kirk suggesting that Gary was a victim who did not ask for what happened to him.
I suggest that these two ideas are somewhat contradictory. If Mitchell were a victim, it would be of a powerful force which apparently warped his mind into believing that he was becoming a god. In that case, the story had nothing to do with corrupting influence of power. It was about an unknown force driving a mortal man mad while bestowing great power.
If the episode is really about the corrputing influence of power, then we must assume that Mitchell was in full control of his faculties. He was simply a guy who crossed over to the dark side at the first opportunity. The speed with which he turned on Captain Kirk and the crew of the Enterprise makes this idea more likely. He had no hesitation about grabing power and hurting his "friends." This might also suggest that he bore some type of resentment toward Kirk. He seemed to show more respect toward Spock than he did Kirk. This suggests that he was never corrupted but was "bad/evil" at heart. The evidence for this seems to come from the fact that Dr. Dehnner never becomes a killer and retains her humanity. Indeed, it was not until she came under Mitchell's malevolent influence that she even entertained the idea of their "superiority." The flip side of this is that both Kirk and Spock prove to be naive in their assesment of Mitchell. Even after everything that Gary did, Kirk still believed that he was a good guy and his friend.
What say you?
On the one hand, the episode discusses the issue of abolute power and corruption. The idea being that Mitchell's attitude was a direct result of his access to extraordinary levels of power. However, the end of the episode has Kirk suggesting that Gary was a victim who did not ask for what happened to him.
I suggest that these two ideas are somewhat contradictory. If Mitchell were a victim, it would be of a powerful force which apparently warped his mind into believing that he was becoming a god. In that case, the story had nothing to do with corrupting influence of power. It was about an unknown force driving a mortal man mad while bestowing great power.
If the episode is really about the corrputing influence of power, then we must assume that Mitchell was in full control of his faculties. He was simply a guy who crossed over to the dark side at the first opportunity. The speed with which he turned on Captain Kirk and the crew of the Enterprise makes this idea more likely. He had no hesitation about grabing power and hurting his "friends." This might also suggest that he bore some type of resentment toward Kirk. He seemed to show more respect toward Spock than he did Kirk. This suggests that he was never corrupted but was "bad/evil" at heart. The evidence for this seems to come from the fact that Dr. Dehnner never becomes a killer and retains her humanity. Indeed, it was not until she came under Mitchell's malevolent influence that she even entertained the idea of their "superiority." The flip side of this is that both Kirk and Spock prove to be naive in their assesment of Mitchell. Even after everything that Gary did, Kirk still believed that he was a good guy and his friend.
What say you?