that's not physically possible with some posters.
Christopher said:
Xeris said:
The Mirror Universe hasn't "diverged" from the Trekiverse, it has always been a darker version of it.
That's just one interpretation. There's no proof of it. Scientifically speaking, a universe that has the same laws of physics, the same planets, the same species, the same languages and cities and technology, must be a divergent timeline; had it been a separate universe from the beginning, it wouldn't have an Earth or a human species any more than Vulcan would have a Lake Michigan or a Monticello. Although it does seem there's something odd about the MU that causes it to remain similar to the main universe, with the same people being born and ending up in similar positions, nearly the same technology and clothing designs being developed, etc., despite the divergence apparently happening a considerable time in the past. Although the same can be said of most fictional alternate realities.
JD said:
I must admit that that does bring up some interesting Questions.
Rosalind said:
a few months before that particular Shatverse book came out, I read an article in New Scientist (I think) about consequences of time travel. The article speculates that the reason time travel doesn't change history is because when people travel to the past, they create a new alternate universe. So I was rather impressed by what I read in Shatner's book.
RedJack said:
Quite Quarrelsome, this Quibbling. I think a Quietus is reQuired.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.