• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Fun Article From Huffington Post

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks for sharing Mutai, and welcome aboard to the TOS forum. :techman:

The kids will be finding a copy of the Star Trek Book of Opposites under the tree at our place this year.
 
So sorry; perhaps you could link me to the part of the forum rules where it says that duplicate threads are allowed so I won't make the same mistake of asking a simple question...
 
So sorry; perhaps you could link me to the part of the forum rules where it says that duplicate threads are allowed so I won't make the same mistake of asking a simple question...

As I said in my reply to your PM, the Huffpo article had been up less than 6 hours when I posted the link. If you can demonstrate that there is a previous iteration, I'll gladly delete this one. Otherwise, there is no "duplicate thread" to discuss.
 
So sorry; perhaps you could link me to the part of the forum rules where it says that duplicate threads are allowed so I won't make the same mistake of asking a simple question...

As I said in my reply to your PM, the Huffpo article had been up less than 6 hours when I posted the link. If you can demonstrate that there is a previous iteration, I'll gladly delete this one. Otherwise, there is no "duplicate thread" to discuss.

Not meaning to step on the mod's toes here, but the above assertion is not correct. I was the O.P. of the first thread about the column in question which, I believe appeared on the Huffington Post a few days ago.
 
So sorry; perhaps you could link me to the part of the forum rules where it says that duplicate threads are allowed so I won't make the same mistake of asking a simple question...

As I said in my reply to your PM, the Huffpo article had been up less than 6 hours when I posted the link. If you can demonstrate that there is a previous iteration, I'll gladly delete this one. Otherwise, there is no "duplicate thread" to discuss.

Not meaning to step on the mod's toes here, but the above assertion is not correct. I was the O.P. of the first thread about the column in question which, I believe appeared on the Huffington Post a few days ago.

Wingsley, no toes stepped on at all and thanks for setting me straight. In fact, I remember your thread now but I never bothered to read the article. I had my "mod goggles" on and was only speed-scanning for any inappropriate posts.

Apologies to Timewalker who was right in his/her assertion. I'll lock this thread now with the link to yours intact.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top