And now, all of a sudden, I'm wondering what an Easy Listening version of "Enter Sandman" would sound like.
It's going to be one of those days, isn't it?
And now, all of a sudden, I'm wondering what an Easy Listening version of "Enter Sandman" would sound like.
It's going to be one of those days, isn't it?
I can see how you feel that way and that's fine. I'm just no longer the adventurous youth I was twenty years ago. These days I prefer the comfort and stability of the familiar.
I've played most of the gam (save for pretty much everything after the Iconian War) and if there's one great thing about it, than it's the Romulan storyline. It had some really great missions (for example "Mind Game") and here's a link to people saying what they liked and disliked about the Romulan story: https://www.reddit.com/r/sto/comments/3a2onk/is_there_a_widespread_disappointment_with_the/ and a link to the wiki page of the Romulan sotryline missions: http://sto.gamepedia.com/Episode. I also quite liked the Federation 23rd century character missions, but those were very very fanservice-y.
I don't think any of the changes that have been made have taken away any of the stuff that people are looking for. If that were the case then people would have stopped buying the books, and they would have stopped publishing the current series.Ultimately people want to buy a brand that is the Brand. In this case, the brand is Star Trek. I have no working knowledge of new Coke, but I get the impression it's a story that applies here. There are things a person buying a Star Trek book expects as part of that brand (or the spin offs) if it's not doing that, it's bad for the brand.
I don't think any of the changes that have been made have taken away any of the stuff that people are looking for. If that were the case then people would have stopped buying the books, and they would have stopped publishing the current series.
It's on the verge of pushing me away. So that's one. They are on two strikes on the DS9 books atm. And from the discussion, I am not the only one. Now factor in people potentially being alienated and not even starting the books.
Quite a few books in recent times have got onto the New York Times lists so I assume they are doing ok sales wise.
I didn't have a huge problem with destroying DS9 - if you're going to continue the story then things have to change from time to time and some of those changes like killing off the Borg have been very successful. The problem is if you destroy the old station then to make it still feel like DS9 then it needs as much of the original cast as possible but the books have done the opposite and dumped most of the main cast. Even more unforgivably the recent books haven't done anything to give us new characters to care about so we have bland characters on an unfamiliar station.
The next book looks like it might be back on track at least with Kira and Quark seeming to be the main characters. That should hopefully bring Ro back into focus a bit more, rather than the generic Captain she's been lately, as they are the two DS9 characters she had the strongest relationships with.
I've had some issues with DRGIII's DS9 books too, but having problems with one set of books by one author isn't enough to turn me away from all of the Trek books. Even if I give up on DRGIII's DS9 books, there are still DS9 books being written by other people, and TNG, Voyager, Titan, Seekers, TOS, DTI, ROTF books and future multi-series crossovers. There are also Discovery books starting next year, and nothing is to stop Pocket from starting more series in the future.I've given up on the DS9 books as written by Dave the third.
I've had some issues with DRGIII's DS9 books too, but having problems with one set of books by one author isn't enough to turn me away from all of the Trek books. Even if I give up on DRGIII's DS9 books, there are still DS9 books being written by other people, and TNG, Voyager, Titan, Seekers, TOS, DTI, ROTF books and future multi-series crossovers. There are also Discovery books starting next year, and nothing is to stop Pocket from starting more series in the future.
I've had some issues with DRGIII's DS9 books too, but having problems with one set of books by one author isn't enough to turn me away from all of the Trek books. Even if I give up on DRGIII's DS9 books, there are still DS9 books being written by other people, and TNG, Voyager, Titan, Seekers, TOS, DTI, ROTF books and future multi-series crossovers. There are also Discovery books starting next year, and nothing is to stop Pocket from starting more series in the future.
It's a bit like the Star Wars EU got at the end...bares very little resemblance to the license you are using to pull in the fan monies.
How was Data "pocketed off for David Mack's personal use" he didn't write a single novel with him after the Cold Equation trilogy, which brought him back. All further Data novels (errr one at this point) were written by Jeffrey Lang.Again there's a bunch of 'sorry who are you?' Characters, and other characters pocketed off for David Mack's personal use. (Data from TNG and Bashir over on DS9)
Um, wrong franchisesort out the Ezra stuff
'Realism' be damned, alleged 'stagnation' if sticking too close to the original format be damned, TOS to STVI covers what...forty years? With the books too? They didn't worry about those things, and apparently it's still the bedrock of the books without changing to format much, without padding the roster, and no one gives a flying Tellarite about it being unrealistic that the crew are still together or have come back from the dead.
This! 110% this.
Not "no one". Can you at least acknowledge that not everyone automatically agrees with you? I mean, what you describe is exactly why I have almost no interest in 5YM books.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.