This blog post is brilliant, one of the best commentaries on Star Trek I've read in years. Thoughtfully written and full of keenly observed insights (and links to other pieces full of additional insights), it addresses TOS, and James T. Kirk in particular, as they actually were and are, rather than as the sadly Flanderized versions (as TVTropes would put it) that persist in the popular imagination.
http://strangehorizons.com/non-fiction/columns/freshly-rememberd-kirk-drift/
It has bothered me for some time that the public perception of Kirk is more caricature than characterization, womanizing and irresponsible, an injustice to the character. It's been the case for years, only made worse by its cartoonish big-budget realization in Abrams' reboot films. All too often it's accompanied by an ill-conceived impression of TOS overall as campy, or simplistic, or tacky, or (most bafflingly) reactionary. Kirk, and the show, were far better than the palimpsest that remains of them in the public mind, and deserve to be appreciated and understood on their own terms — as this piece does with scintillating intelligence.
(In passing, I must also admit with some embarrassment that I literally *never* thought of "The Conscience of the King" as a Holocaust metaphor. I only ever saw the Shakespearean elements of that episode. Amazing what one can overlook!...)
http://strangehorizons.com/non-fiction/columns/freshly-rememberd-kirk-drift/
"Kirk, as received through mass culture memory and reflected in its productive imaginary (and subsequent franchise output, including the reboot movies), has little or no basis in Shatner’s performance and the television show as aired. Macho, brash Kirk is a mass hallucination."
It has bothered me for some time that the public perception of Kirk is more caricature than characterization, womanizing and irresponsible, an injustice to the character. It's been the case for years, only made worse by its cartoonish big-budget realization in Abrams' reboot films. All too often it's accompanied by an ill-conceived impression of TOS overall as campy, or simplistic, or tacky, or (most bafflingly) reactionary. Kirk, and the show, were far better than the palimpsest that remains of them in the public mind, and deserve to be appreciated and understood on their own terms — as this piece does with scintillating intelligence.
(In passing, I must also admit with some embarrassment that I literally *never* thought of "The Conscience of the King" as a Holocaust metaphor. I only ever saw the Shakespearean elements of that episode. Amazing what one can overlook!...)