• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Fox wants to try a sci-fi Western again!?!

If Star Trek actually had been Wagon Train to the Stars, I doubt it would have survived long. Why do people insist on thinking that Star Trek was all about a journey with the goal of space colonization! That wasn't what the series was about at all!

I've always wondered about that too, I know Roddenberry sold the series that way but I never got "Wagon Train" from Star Trek.

it was because it was a series using recurrent characters on a long journey.

That makes some sense, I think it's the *train* element that always struck me odd, plus the fact that they're not headed toward any single destination. Now, Battlestar Galactica, there's your Wagon Train to the Stars.
 
I've always wondered about that too, I know Roddenberry sold the series that way but I never got "Wagon Train" from Star Trek.

it was because it was a series using recurrent characters on a long journey.

That makes some sense, I think it's the *train* element that always struck me odd, plus the fact that they're not headed toward any single destination. Now, Battlestar Galactica, there's your Wagon Train to the Stars.

A "wagon train" implies that they are emigrants travelling to settle some new land. Those are the people who used actual wagon trains in the Old West. Star Trek was more like the US Cavalry, roaming around because their job was, in part, to safeguard colonists (and even that fell by the wayside after TOS). The Western analogies in Star Trek are extremely minimal. The "Wagon Train to the Stars" was just a cynical ploy to make the network suits think they were getting the sci fi version of a successful show.
 
"Cynical":confused:
I doubt any one took the phrase literaly. It was just a quick way of saying what the show was about. A ship with moving from place to place meeting interesting people and doing interesting things.
 
I never understand the bile leveled at Fox, for how they treat their shows.

I mean I certainly understand that networks (in general) often water down ideas from various creators, or don't fully understand them (and this is true with all networks). And I understand people get upset when shows they care for get cancelled (and again this happens on every network). Fox, for all of those faults (which it shares with others), often picks up more scifi themed shows then any of the other networks (and thats with them actually scheduling fewer shows then the other three).
 
I guess since Fox screwed the pooch on "Firefly" they are trying to grab that viewing audience again.

I like Westerns and I love Sci-Fi, but I've always had a hard time getting into the combined genre.
 
I guess since Fox screwed the pooch on "Firefly" they are trying to grab that viewing audience again.

I like Westerns and I love Sci-Fi, but I've always had a hard time getting into the combined genre.
Then why is your avatar a cowboy on Mars?;)
 
Good luck getting a quality director after what they did with Firefly...or maybe they'll just settle for some dribble to humor their non thinking viewers.
 
I don't get why everytime a "sci-fi western" comes up people suddenly think it's a rip of Firefly. Newsflash: Oblivion, Galaxina, the Wild Wild West (the good one with Bob Conrad and the crapfest with Will Smith) and about a half dozen other films and TV shows I've forgotten had been doing the SF western thing long before Firefly came along.

Not to mention Cowboy Bebop, which was genius.
The others all still pale in comparison to Firefly though- and it's set the bar pretty damn high.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top