Yes I think we are having a big misunderstanding here.
It's called being a three-dimensional character, rather than the flat, cardboard cutouts many TV characters are.Obvious, yes. Believable, not really. The actor doesn't really look war-weary, does he? He's a guy your mum would love you to bring home. He kinda reminds me of Michael J. Fox.The fact that he refers to others as "son" or "boy" only emphasizes his war-weary attitude. I thought it was obvious.
But it's not only the actor. The character itself is not very constant. It doesn't make sense to see the war-weary guy act rather infantile when he's around Inara. Who exactly is socially inept again...?
It's called being a three-dimensional character, rather than the flat, cardboard cutouts many TV characters are.Obvious, yes. Believable, not really. The actor doesn't really look war-weary, does he? He's a guy your mum would love you to bring home. He kinda reminds me of Michael J. Fox.The fact that he refers to others as "son" or "boy" only emphasizes his war-weary attitude. I thought it was obvious.
But it's not only the actor. The character itself is not very constant. It doesn't make sense to see the war-weary guy act rather infantile when he's around Inara. Who exactly is socially inept again...?
Have you met any war-weary vets? Are they all socially competent and suave around the ladies?
I did wonder as well what 'Western' trope the Reavers are meant to be: loco injuns? Donner Passers? mutant hillbillies?
ETA: Doesn't Baldwin use the 'I was aiming for his head' gag. I'm sure I've heard that before, but did Whedon originate it?
I'm thinking lurok is going to like the next one.
I'm knowing I am going to like the next one![]()
ETA: Doesn't Baldwin use the 'I was aiming for his head' gag. I'm sure I've heard that before, but did Whedon originate it?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.