Fetishes and Turn-ons

[LitmusDragon]

^I knew a heterosexual woman who referred to male genitalia as "turkey giblets". She enjoyed sex with men but didn't find looking at their bits arousing in the least. As with everything else, to each his/her own.

I've read that being turned on by the visual component of sex is a largely male thing, whereas women tend to be more audio-oriented. There being exceptions to every rule of course.

 

[SPCTRE]

I recently realized I'm way into smartly dressed business women. You know, corporate types in pant suits and the like.

Suffice it to say, I'm looking forward to my company's next Human Resources trade fair appearance.

 

[Myasishchev]

As for the first point, genitalia are wonderful things, filled with all these great nerve endings, and pleasant to look at if they're functional and you understand their function. Why would anybody be put off by them? Is there some quality about a vagina that makes it grosser than, say, an eyeball? They're both just bags of tissue and blood attached by wet wires to a piece of meat that thinks. If you're gonna be grossed out by genitals, you might as well revolt at the sight of a tongue or hand.

Logically, yes, but whoever said people were logical? In most cultures we don't see much genatalia on a day-to-day basis. On top of that, our culture itself (even if indirectly) still views them as something to be ashamed of. If we saw genatalia every day on everyone then we'd have an everyday reaction to it. Instead the variety is unfamiliar to us. No matter how many penises and labias you see, they'll never be as mundane as a hand or eye.

Well, I think the point to take away is that a disgust with genitalia (or non-toxic secretions) is unhealthy.

And sperm can't hurt you. Unless it's, like, squid sperm. That shit burrows through flesh.

 

[SG-17]

Who wants to look at genitalia in action? And why do porn films have cum shots?

Yo.

There are at least three reasons:

1)Because it's hot, and the reason it's hot is because believing it is so is an evolutionary advantage arising from sperm competition.
2)The identification character you're vicariously having sex through is getting off.
3)Semen on skin aesthetically pleasing.

Porn without a cumshot is like... well, it's like sex without a cumshot. Frustrating.

Repeated exposure to sperm can also lower rejection rates for fetuses due to the woman's immune system learning to ignore the male's DNA.


Also I find a girl with a great smile so much more attractive than one without. Plus the eyes can make or break a woman.

 

[LitmusDragon]

Repeated exposure to sperm can also lower rejection rates for fetuses due to the woman's immune system learning to ignore the male's DNA.

Sounds kinda urban-legendy to me

 

[LitmusDragon]

edit:
Double-post

 

[Amaris]

Repeated exposure to sperm can also lower rejection rates for fetuses due to the woman's immune system learning to ignore the male's DNA.

Sounds kinda urban-legendy to me

Just a quick citation: http://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(03)00355-7/abstract

 

[LitmusDragon]

Well I'll be damned.

 

[SG-17]

Repeated exposure to sperm can also lower rejection rates for fetuses due to the woman's immune system learning to ignore the male's DNA.

Sounds kinda urban-legendy to me

http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=1340021
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semen#Health_effects

Edit: Well there you go.

 

[Myasishchev]

That settles it: when you don't take facials, you're killing babies.

 

[Gryffindorian]

Oh, my! Does this affect men on the receiving end?

 

[SG-17]

Well considering that this isn't Sliders and men can't carry babies, I doubt it would have any affect whatsoever.

 

[Sephiroth]

Funny how that works...

disappointed?

Honestly, yeah. It wouldn't necessarily be an absolute deal-breaker for me, but if I'm going to be GGG then I expect my partner to be so as well. Mostly, I just know that a man comfortable and open enough with his sexuality to enjoy such a scenario would make a better partner for me. I certainly couldn't relate well to a man who cannot at least see admit when another man is good-looking.

as long as you keep the cosplay out of it ._.

 

[Gryffindorian]

Well considering that this isn't Sliders and men can't carry babies, I doubt it would have any affect whatsoever.

Pregnant women appear to benefit from it in that it reduces the risk of preeclampsia.

Yet the Wikipedia article says that it also acts as an antidepressant of sorts.

 

[Myasishchev]

-Threesomes, especially with two guys who are willing to have fun with eachother as well as the gal.

Query: would it matter if the gentleman just faked it?

I've never been in the situation, although I think I came close (I didn't figure out if the woman in question was hitting me up for a threesome or just looking to cheat on her--I believe--bisexual boyfriend with me, as I was in a relationship that would've been injured by the sexual adventure, at the time), but looking back on that incident over the years, I reckoned I'd have paid to play. I could do worse than her boyfriend, for one thing, and for two she was hot enough that taking the shot would've been worth it.

It's analogous to the classic question posed by the Corrs Conundrum.

So really, my question is, would the guy-on-guy have to be the raison d'copulation? From a straight perspective, I never especially cared that much in a MFF if the girls particularly enjoyed or actually mounted any FF aspect. It's a bonus, to be sure, but not a requirement.

 

[Mr. Laser Beam]

It's analogous to the classic question posed by the Corrs Conundrum.

Which is?

 

[Myasishchev]

Ordinarily formulated, "Would you have sex with Jim Corr in order to have sex with Andrea, Sharon and Caroline Corr?"

Probably worth it.

 

[scotpens]

^^

That’s a tough one. Reminds me of the classic Jack Benny bit where a robber points a gun at him and says, “Your money or your life!”

The reply after a suitable pause: “I’m thinking it over!”

 

[Myasishchev]

They may be getting a bit old now, so that appending "in 1995" may be appropriate.

Then you have the added philosophical problem "Now that you're back in 1995, do you get pounded by Jim Corr waiting for your chance with his sisters, or do you warn the authorities in Oklahoma City, you callous pervert?"

 

[Amaris]

Ordinarily formulated, "Would you have sex with Jim Corr in order to have sex with Andrea, Sharon and Caroline Corr?"

Probably worth it.

Absolutely.