Translated, it means Kirkman is poor writer dodging the natural human trait explored in "TS-19" by Darabont, who was the true writer.
Well, that's not exactly what I meant. I think Kirkman has certain writing strengths, but one of his weaknesses is that he wants to ignore things that make the story not work instead of trying to find a clever workaround (at least on TV).
Then, that is a case of being a poor writer who dodges. Even a serio-comedy like
Return of the Living Dead provided a specific reason for the reanimated dead. To
avoid it--not only as a writer, but with the characters--kills any believable reasons for their actions moving forward.
No rational mind (whether is it among characters...or WD franchise fans) would think to say nothing of "what / when / how" if the most unexpected, disastrous event in history suddenly hit humankind. That's why Darabont added exactly what was needed in TWD season one: characters seeking answers. Without that, TWD would have been a group just sitting around, trying to avoid the occasional zombie, instead of appearing intelligent, and wanting to know if the ZA can be stalled or stopped altogether.
That said, I think it's very difficult to explain how the world could fall without just saying a wizard did it. So many things are very difficult to add up. I can see not wanting to address certain things because of that, which is why most zombie fiction starts well after the initial outbreak panic. That's one reason why this show has a lot of scrutiny. They set the show in this time period while still wanting to avoid a lot of what comes with that.
Well, look back to the original
Night of the Living Dead, the prologue / credits sequence to the 2004
Dawn remake, and the aforementioned Return--each provided either an explanation, or moments dedicated to official response and/or theory. That--and/or news coverage frames the fictional world in realistic terms
the audience understands and
expects, when any major disease or catastrophe occurs.
Darabont knew the quest for official answers was expected, and as a result, TWD's first season ended with the relief that a "how / what / when" had been addressed by story and character, and did not need to be addressed again until Milton, and the
promise of Eugene's story.
FTWD--at a time when everyone should be seeking answers like TWD season 1--fails through cowardly writers / avoidance.
The more you dodge the issue of the virus and the outbreak, the more you build up its importance (and also the disappointment when you finally address the issue). Let's face it, it's can only be a number of possibilities. Came from outer space, military created it, mad cult created it etc. It doesn't actually matter that much but if they continue to side-step it then it obviously becomes something that fans will speculate on.
Agreed.
Unless you're bitten by a zombie, in which case you get the active version from the zombie (even if it's a non-lethal bite) or the bite transforms the dormant version within you into the active version? But if that's true then doesn't that make the dormant version entirely redundant to the story?
Remember when Bob shouted "tainted meat." Well was it tainted or was it still just the dormant version of the virus they were eating?
I think he meant your 1st point: Bob had the active version of the bite (which was in the process of killing him).