• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Favourite Trek Technology

replicators :D
no more grocery shopping!

Yeah, but think of the electricity bill converting energy to matter!

The most important question is: Do we really need atom level manipulation to replicate day to day things?

I think what would come before replicators, will be 3d fabrication devices, rather like modern day inkjet printers. Rather than assemble things from the atom up, they can spray layers of resin to build up a 3d object. There are devices already like this in industry to create prototype models and casings for new products. It is only a matter of time before some entrepreneur finds a commercially viable excuse to bring them to the consumer market. Just like inkjet printers, in time the print resolution will increase, and dyes will be available to dope the resin sprays to give colour to the fabricated solids.

For food replicators, the task is more complex, but it may grow out of the above. As print resolution becomes high enough to reproduce semi-solid textures, that may initially resemble sponge, eventually resembling fruit and vegetable textures, we could then recreate 3d food synthetics. Instead of spraying resins, it may be strands of fibre and protein. Or a two part mixture of peptides and a hardener, analogous to epoxy, that polymerises into true proteins when combined.

That reproduces texture... Then there's water/oil content (as a solvent), and the flavours colours and nutritional minerals (to carry in that solvent). What we need here are the component chemicals of the food, which the computer mixes together in correct proportions, and dopes the spraying mixture with them.

Even if the chemical composition was 99% accurate (which is easy to determine with modern mass spectrometry), I imagine the flavours would be close enough to be enjoyable.

I imagine that is how it would develop. First stage are the solid replicators.
 
1st post on this thread for 2 years but I thought I would pitch in. Holodeck every time.

If you could program your own holodeck simulations I would spend pretty much every day on the following three.

Planet of the nymphomaniacs, Chocolate town and Football manager.
 
Holodeck everytime. Complete with holodeck chicks.
And I'd like to play Halo and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 on the holodeck. How about GTA4 for the holodeck?
 
I think the human race would be in serious trouble should holodeck technology ever arise. I for one would be a 'holoaddict' pretty much immediately. After losing over 260 hours of life to Modern Warfare I can barely imagine what would happen should I be given the opportunity to jump in, as it were.

GTA4 would be more than awesome :-)
 
I've always been partial to a tricorder--a combination sensor, computer, and recorder all in one neat handheld device. From TOS, to TNG, to Star Trek X, and even Star Trek IX, always liked seeing them in use onscreen.
 
Industrial replicator. There are two other devices that I might like. There was this device that stored the persons intellect but not his soul/personality like Data could in that episode where a dying genius possesed him. More advanced was the device Barclay used to imprison Moriarty. A holodeck used by virtual citizens the Doctor could visit--all the size of a breadbox. Best yet would be to combine the two, so that a person could jack in using the addictive headsets from TNG (Caprica like), pass through while a copy of your intellect was preserved for posterity, and to play inside Barc's Box.

If all else fails, beam the contents to the Nexus. Artificial Heaven. Who needs a replicator then?
 
1. Plastic-Aluminum (I think that is what it was called in "Voyage Home") I'd sell the formula and make a lot of money.
2. the GNDN conduit because it Goes Nowhere and Does Nothing.
 
Last edited:
I'd pick the Synthetic Personnel Units.

All of them in any form. (Positronic/Holographic/Isomprphic/Synthetic Technician/Exocomp/any)

They don't eat, sleep, need air or gravity in most instances, or defecate. The work 24/7, can be programmed to shut up when you want, go into battle in your stead, fix things for you, and are generally immune to extreme environmental conditions.

Beyond a Captain and a few other (organic) Department Heads, I think the rest of the crew, which would be considerably reduced by Synthetics, is all you need.

Though they do have their vulnerabilities, they're sure are handy !
 
A technology that makes you obsolete doesn't appear to be a sound investment...

I personally like those riot shields from ST5. Neatly collapsible and portable, lightweight and transparent, yet capable of stopping a hail of bullets without tearing the user's hand out of its socket. Truly advanced materials technology, plus perhaps a few inertia-manipulating gimmicks, at work. High tech but low key...

The reliable long range stun gun is probably the more significant military development in Trek, though. One could have real fun with one of those! :devil:

Timo Saloniemi
 
Phasers and replicators... Can't decide.

A reason, I wanna a phaser, is, that I can stun stupid people with it...
And replicators, because I don't have to wait when making food... It comes directly.
 
Opinions?

Useful, yes, incredibly. But its still a few years off from being invented, not alot, less than 20.


Well it could be built TODAY, if someone got buy busy with microcontrollers. The only additional driver software to program would be the bit that identifies what to be copied and then gives the copying command. Everything else already happens -- protocols for connecting bluetooth and wireless storage and plugnplay cursors already exist.

So for the identifying bit, there are two ways:

The clever way: Hand tool has a camera which takes a photo of the computer screen it is looking at - the bit in the middle of the image is what the cursor is under. SIMPLE image recognition then relates that to a screen capture image, to see what computer object should be manipulated.

The quick way: On connecting the tool as a plugnplay mouse, it changes the computer's mouse cursor to a flashing dot. The tool has maybe 4 ORP12's (light dependent resistors). These can be arranged as two potential dividers, with series capacitors, one horizontally mounted, one vertically mounted. So there are like 4 eyes looking at the screen from the end of the tool, from the top/bottom/left/right of it. Together these potential dividers measure the RELATIVE position of the flashing light source to the tool on their horz-vert axes. It then nudges the mouse cursor to find an equilibrium where these light sensors are voltage balanced. At this point, the flashing cursor should be in line with the centre of the tool.

That's all there is to it. :)

This is kind of old, but I just had a thought. You wouldn't really need anything in the pen tool to actually see whats on the screen. We already have pen tools that interact with screens, palm-pilots for example. The pen tool for the nintendo DS. There are probably more examples. The only thing you need beyond that is the blue tooth storage in the pen tool itself, or even just a usb cable, and a program that tells it to take whatever is under the pen tool in a particular spot and move it to the storage device.

So we've got the pen tool, we've got the storage device. Anyone want to write the program?
 
replicators :D
no more grocery shopping!

Yeah, but think of the electricity bill converting energy to matter!

The most important question is: Do we really need atom level manipulation to replicate day to day things?

I think what would come before replicators, will be 3d fabrication devices, rather like modern day inkjet printers. Rather than assemble things from the atom up, they can spray layers of resin to build up a 3d object. There are devices already like this in industry to create prototype models and casings for new products. It is only a matter of time before some entrepreneur finds a commercially viable excuse to bring them to the consumer market. Just like inkjet printers, in time the print resolution will increase, and dyes will be available to dope the resin sprays to give colour to the fabricated solids.

For food replicators, the task is more complex, but it may grow out of the above. As print resolution becomes high enough to reproduce semi-solid textures, that may initially resemble sponge, eventually resembling fruit and vegetable textures, we could then recreate 3d food synthetics. Instead of spraying resins, it may be strands of fibre and protein. Or a two part mixture of peptides and a hardener, analogous to epoxy, that polymerises into true proteins when combined.

That reproduces texture... Then there's water/oil content (as a solvent), and the flavours colours and nutritional minerals (to carry in that solvent). What we need here are the component chemicals of the food, which the computer mixes together in correct proportions, and dopes the spraying mixture with them.

Even if the chemical composition was 99% accurate (which is easy to determine with modern mass spectrometry), I imagine the flavours would be close enough to be enjoyable.

I imagine that is how it would develop. First stage are the solid replicators.


Well check this out! http://io9.com/5717803/someday-you-will-be-able-to-print-your-own-dinner
 

I made that post two years ago. I'm pleased to see the world is catching up. :p

And I think the time is about right now for solid fabrication to become commercially viable.

Over the past few years, what has grown tremendously is 3D modeling as an art form. The desire to express oneself through sculpture is also visible with games like the hugely popular Minecraft.

If 3D printing devices were affordable, say ~ $300, I imagine a lot of hobbyists would be willing to pay for their own little desktop fabricator to give their creature and vehicle designs a physical presence.
 

I made that post two years ago. I'm pleased to see the world is catching up. :p

And I think the time is about right now for solid fabrication to become commercially viable.

Over the past few years, what has grown tremendously is 3D modeling as an art form. The desire to express oneself through sculpture is also visible with games like the hugely popular Minecraft.

If 3D printing devices were affordable, say ~ $300, I imagine a lot of hobbyists would be willing to pay for their own little desktop fabricator to give their creature and vehicle designs a physical presence.

If all the other tech that's round at the moment is anything to go by then I should imagine 3D printers for the home will be affordable within the next 5 years (that's a conservative estimate). I for one will be purchasing one to 'print' half of the ship designs in the fan art forum.

Anything less than £250 ($300) then I'm getting one.
 
My favorite Tech Technology is warp drive.It's awesome. This is so because we met the Vulcans with warp drive.
 
Trek Tech Favorites

The phasor I would use for targeting practice. I'd pass the time breaking up boulders and shale from a distance. The bolts look like tracer bullets and would be entertaining.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top