Joel_Kirk said:Too, I believe Craig is the shortest actor to portray the character. IIRC, he's around my height: 5'-9."
5'10", according IMDB http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0185819/?mode=desktop
Close enough...

Daniel Craig wouldn't be good as Lando because that's not a part Daniel Craig would play. He usually portrays rugged characters.
Kate Winslet is so not Uhura. And, Jason Statham is soooo not Kato.
How do you know Daniel Craig wouldn't be good as Lando? Lando is an ex-con scoundrel. Are you saying Craig, an excellent actor, couldn't bring Lando to life?
Hmmm?
The fact is that Craig would be amazing in such a part. The question for me though is SHOULD Craig? Me personally, I'd rather have Billy Dee Williams play the part.
And why couldn't Statham and Winslet play those roles??? Winslet is a phenomenal actress, I'm sure she could play Uhura. Statham is a very physical actor and would pull off the physicality of Kato tremendously.
Hmmm?
It could happen...I guess.
Shaft's "blackness" in the Richard Roundtree and Sam L movies is irrelevant to the discussion. I'm talking about a NEW Shaft movie with an Asian star in the lead. Only the writers will write Shaft with an Asian actor in mind. And if we can't get a suitable Asian actor, let's get a Hispanic and we'll write Shaft as a Hispanic character.
Don't like the idea, eh?
Yeah, me neither.
Nonsense. Hugh Jackman is a tall man playing Wolverine, a short character. Diggs isn't too short. He can pull off the glasses look too.
(No one has been able to duplicate what Christopher Reeve did in a live action performance, yet).
Agreed 100%.
As a person who has interned in the film business and plans on getting into the film business...I'm going to recommend you don't get into casting. It seems like you're just casting individuals 'just for the sake of'....(lol)
In regards to Shaft: No, the 'blackness' part of it isn't irrelevant. The character in the books and the films was a statement on the black experience in America, as aforementioned. There isn't a way you make a statement on the black experience in America if you cast a non-black individual.
Shaft was a man who stood up to racist policemen, had women of all backgrounds find him sexy (e.g. there was going to be a Shaft in China but Shaft in Africa didn't do so well) and, as aforementioned, made a statement about those black individuals like Knock Parsons/Bumpy Jonas who stunt black progress.
Casting a non-black individual 'just because' isn't reason to change the character. It's like changing the gender of Honey West to a male and claiming that's being progressive...when West, one of the early female action heroes as well as an independent female, was something big in the 1950s/early 1960s since that was unheard of at the time to have a woman handle action for herself. (Or, to put out another example, it would be like Roger Moore being cast right after Richard Roundtree as Shaft. It comes off as someone trying to suppress any black statements about America)..
With that said, the Sam Jackson version of Shaft was horrible because it had no substance to it. Too, Richard Roundtree is a handsome dude....and Sam Jackson is 'cool' to a degree, but doesn't share the looks that Roundtree had in the role.