• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Facebook Math Debate: 6÷2(1+2)=?

6÷2(1+2)=?


  • Total voters
    107
Well, I said 1. Mainly because I took 2(1+2) to be the denominator of the fraction 6 / 2(1+2)

so thats 6/6 or 1/1 or just 1

it is cleaner that way. AS others have pointed out, should you really want the answer to be 9, you should use different syntax. (6/2) * (1+2) = (3) * (3) = 9.

As its written 1 is the correct answer....lalalalalalalal I don't hear you....
 
The only difference is that in the second version you've used the distributive property to re-write the problem.

The distributive property applies where you have both addition and multiplication

eg, E = (M+C) × C = (M×C)+ (C×C)
 
isn't E= Mx(CxC), it's (MxC)x(MxC), yes?
Actually, now that I'm thinking about it, these equations are saying the exact same thing. The only difference is that in the second version you've used the distributive property to re-write the problem.

Man I suck at this type of maths.

Let's give values to this

E= 2x3(squared)

So it's either (2x3)x(2x3) = 36
Or 2x(3x3) = 18

Also, no one's reinterpreted the equation, so that C is to the left of the equal sign. Any thoughts?

For me, and it's probably entirely wrong, something like
C = square root of (E-M)
 
In PIDMAS, the I is for Indices.

When you write E = MC^2, the ^ symbolises Indices, and you do these before multiplication.

C^2 can be replaced with C×C, giving E = M×(C×C)

Because multiplication is associative, we can omit the parentheses, giving E = M×C×C

If we want to rearrange the equation, divide both sides by M, giving E/M = M×C×C / M

The two M on the right hand side cancel, giving C^2 = E/M

C = √ (E/M)
 
isn't E= Mx(CxC), it's (MxC)x(MxC), yes?
Actually, now that I'm thinking about it, these equations are saying the exact same thing. The only difference is that in the second version you've used the distributive property to re-write the problem.

Man I suck at this type of maths.

Let's give values to this

E= 2x3(squared)

So it's either (2x3)x(2x3) = 36
Or 2x(3x3) = 18

Also, no one's reinterpreted the equation, so that C is to the left of the equal sign. Any thoughts?

For me, and it's probably entirely wrong, something like
C = square root of (E-M)

Wow, dude, basic math. That's elementary stuff. Kids learn that in, I dunno, the cradle.
 
If you place the equation into an excel table and replace the standard division sign with a ' / ' the correct answer 9 comes up in less than 5 seconds where is the debate? Even without using Excel I don't know how anyone else derives another answer.
 
The programmer in me knows that 6a/2a is probably an incorrect attempt to write 6*a/(2*a) [...].
This.

I first saw the whole debate about this expression here and upon seeing the poll (and not reading the first poll) my thoughts were "Well... 9 but I guess you meant 1".
 
Actually, now that I'm thinking about it, these equations are saying the exact same thing. The only difference is that in the second version you've used the distributive property to re-write the problem.

Man I suck at this type of maths.

Let's give values to this

E= 2x3(squared)

So it's either (2x3)x(2x3) = 36
Or 2x(3x3) = 18

Also, no one's reinterpreted the equation, so that C is to the left of the equal sign. Any thoughts?

For me, and it's probably entirely wrong, something like
C = square root of (E-M)

Wow, dude, basic math. That's elementary stuff. Kids learn that in, I dunno, the cradle.
Meh. Maths was never, ever my thing.
 
Gee, I answered '1' as well, and I took A level Maths only 4/5 years ago :(

Somewhere along the line, I must have somehow got it into my head to resolve numbers that aren't separated by the actual 'x' multiplication or '÷' division symbol first (as in this example the '2(1+2)') and then resolve everything else.

I remember the phrase BODMAS from somewhere, but it's meaning obviously left me a while ago :p

If I was writing that problem with the intention of '1' being the answer, I would have written it as 6÷2x(1+2) or (6÷2)x(1+2) for clarity.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top