• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Europe to Australia in 4 1/2 hours.

flux_29

Commodore
Commodore
A revolutionary new airliner is being designed that could fly trippers from Britain to Australia in just 4½ HOURS.

Billed as Concorde’s much bigger and faster successor, the plane’s hi-tech liquid hydrogen engines will propel it to 3,400mph — FIVE TIMES the speed of sound.

But its 300 passengers will not see much on the way. It has no windows as the searing external heat generated at Mach 5 would melt them.

The aircraft, code-named A2, is still on the drawing board. But its designers from British firm Reaction Engines say it could well become reality.

Boss Alan Bond said: “It sounds incredible by today’s standards but I don’t see why future generations can’t make day trips to Australasia.

“The total flight time from Europe to Australia, allowing for air traffic control, would be 4 hours 40 minutes.” The company, of Abingdon, Oxfordshire, has been given European Space Agency funding. The agency wants to find new propulsion systems that could dramatically cut long-haul flight times.


The A2 is 139m long but lighter than a Jumbo jet. It would fly to Oz 19 miles above Earth in the middle of the stratosphere, the second layer of our atmosphere, heading over the North Pole and Pacific.

But it has a tiny carbon footprint as it produces only water vapour and nitrous oxide as exhaust.

Tickets are expected to cost around £2,000.

Links:
Reaction Engines

A2 Gallery

The Guardian

Fly the green skies at Mach 5


Discuss. :)
 
One does wonder, though -- if they couldn't afford to keep the Concorde in operation, how is this one likely to fare any better? Will it ever even see service?
 
M´Sharak said:
One does wonder, though -- if they couldn't afford to keep the Concorde in operation, how is this one likely to fare any better? Will it ever even see service?

Well you can start with the passenger load - 300 people is twice the capacity of Concorde.

It's possible the running costs could be much lower and by doing routes such as U.K -> Australia you can fly supersonic for much of the way, turn the plane around and fly back within a day so not only can you can carry more passengers but you can make more flights.
 
It woulnd't be the same without windows though, I'd want to see the ground below me moving that fast. Maybe they'll have cameras and video fed into a displays inside the craft?
 
Could they find a pilot to fly the thing without any windows? Pilots put a lot of credit in their backup system of last resort; namely the good old Mk I eyeball.

I don't blame them much, either!
 
Looking at the pictures it reminds me of ships designed by Gerry Anderson in the 60's, like in Thunderbirds.
 
Brent said:
It woulnd't be the same without windows though, I'd want to see the ground below me moving that fast. Maybe they'll have cameras and video fed into a displays inside the craft?

If you're flying to Australia, most of the trip will be over water so you're not going to see the ground :)

But seriously given that most people don't see out the window anyway would it make that much difference?
 
I've been hearing about hypersonic planes since I was in diapers and I'm still waiting.
 
Alpha_Geek said:
Could they find a pilot to fly the thing without any windows? Pilots put a lot of credit in their backup system of last resort; namely the good old Mk I eyeball.

In one of those links it's suggested that flatscreen monitors would show an image of what's outside (because it would be difficult to install an actual window on something that flies this fast).

Then again, a properly trained navigator might not need windows anyway. A stopwatch and a map, yes. :)
 
The only reason Concorde got shut down was because of the amount of fuel it consumed and the amount of pollution it created. If a hypersonic craft can be designed and developed with minimal pollution emissions than theres no reason it wont 'take off' so to speak. ;)
 
Sounds like an awesome plane, but it would be a major bummer to not be able to look out the window and watch as I zipped through the stratosphere over the north pole at mach 5.
 
You won't miss much except maybe hazzy orange glow that brightly illuminates the edge that connects the main body and window as it slowly eats away whatever is hold the two joints together.
 
many designs for supersonic/hypersonic airliners have been bandied about since the 50s...

when the thing flies..I'll believe it then..and only then..Jeeze I still don't have my flying car either...
 
I'd still like to see the Transatlantic Tunnel built, so we could get from New York to London in ONE hour. :thumbsup:
 
Amazing to think that we can be in any major city on Earth in 24 hours, and it's still not fast enough. :D
 
Yep. Now I'd love a plane that would take me where I'm going before I decide to leave!
:lol:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top