Many thanks for resetting the deadline like that. I've already got my keepers selected.
ESPN Fantasy Football Anyone?
- Thread starter tomalak301
- Start date
I'm already playing in 3 leagues, but if you end up short a team, I'll fill out the last spot.
Garak: you're already in the yearly league through ESPN, so set there.
Sportzkid: send me your email again, i don't have it handy. will send invite from there. And yes, no more moving the keeper date, that's dumb. Once, because everyone forgot, is fine, but stop pushing it back. I don't like the draft that late, but it's alright, I guess.
Everyone else: 3 spots left in the yearly league!
Sportzkid: send me your email again, i don't have it handy. will send invite from there. And yes, no more moving the keeper date, that's dumb. Once, because everyone forgot, is fine, but stop pushing it back. I don't like the draft that late, but it's alright, I guess.
Everyone else: 3 spots left in the yearly league!
Scout, I'm game for playing again this year.
I can't get into the page from work to check, but believe it's set to the standard default at the moment, which isn't that high. Upthread it looks like 7 is mentioned as the number. Between bye weeks and injuries, doesn't seem unreasonable, as you'd want to attempt to have at least one option for most positions. Especially if you've got 2-3 people on a bye from your team on a certain week. Shouldn't have to make a decision between leaving a position open or dropping a key player from your team. At that point, you've got room to almost cover the positions every week (unless you draft badly and hit the same bye week too many times), with room to carry an injury or a project pick.
Fewer bench spots, IMO, waters things down for a different reason. When forced with having to drop a GOOD player in order to fill a TE or DEF spot, for example, some people won't drop them, so there will be a bunch of weeks with people using empty slots on the roster.
Let's be honest, anyway, the league won't be won because someone is carrying an extra WR they picked up in the 22nd round. It'll be won by being quick to the Waiver wire, or knowing to draft that WR in the 13th round instead.
Fewer bench spots, IMO, waters things down for a different reason. When forced with having to drop a GOOD player in order to fill a TE or DEF spot, for example, some people won't drop them, so there will be a bunch of weeks with people using empty slots on the roster.
Let's be honest, anyway, the league won't be won because someone is carrying an extra WR they picked up in the 22nd round. It'll be won by being quick to the Waiver wire, or knowing to draft that WR in the 13th round instead.
I don't see a problem with 7 bench positions. As said earlier, between the byes and injuries, you need a deep bench.
Wish I would have seen coaster's keeper league trade offer earlier. I was in need of a good QB and would have taken the offer had LIU not taken the same offer before me.
Wish I would have seen coaster's keeper league trade offer earlier. I was in need of a good QB and would have taken the offer had LIU not taken the same offer before me.
I would have traded a draft pick also, but I was too late. I didn't realize at the time that he had other trades in the works. Gotta give him credit- he set things up pretty good for himself.
Similar threads
- Poll
