Half the tenants were bookstores and video stores.It's Ghost Pine Mall now that it's been shuttered in 2025 from multiple retail bankruptcies like JC Penney.![]()
Half the tenants were bookstores and video stores.It's Ghost Pine Mall now that it's been shuttered in 2025 from multiple retail bankruptcies like JC Penney.![]()
Or No Pines Left Mall, since Doc's steam-powered Choo Choo Time Machine took out the other one.
...and, SCENE.
I'll take "predestination paradox" for a thousand, Alex.![]()
According to ENT, it was.![]()
And yet we have Riker visiting a holodeck recreation of the NX-01 in the year 2370. Three years before the Enterprise-E traveled back in time to 2063.But, that also can just show that ENT was a *product* of FC - and occurs after the events of it has altered the past.
I wish people would stop saying that.
BTTF is NOT saying that wealth brings happiness. Yes, the McFlys ARE richer (not rich, just richER) in the new tiimeline. But that's irrelevant.
The McFlys are happy because they're stronger and more confident. All of them, not just George. And that added strength and confidence is the reason they're better off.
About that bit in BTTF2 when Old Biff is visibly ill as he gets out of the DeLorean: I like the explanation that the reason he's sick and being erased from existence, because Lorraine shot him sometime in the past.![]()
and that still happened post FC. Seven didn't pop up until post FC either, because now her parents had borg stuff to study from ENT. Everything after FC is affected by FC.And yet we have Riker visiting a holodeck recreation of the NX-01 in the year 2370. Three years before the Enterprise-E traveled back in time to 2063.
i remember being young and reading books like that, karate kid and gremlins, and always being confused at how many extra scenes and differences there were in the books.The book adds several sub-plots... Strickland is a way bigger prick than he was in the book, and George doesn't just run late on his mission to save Lorraine; he gets delayed by several of his classmates.
Well from your description it doesn't sound like a "'Middle' to 'Upper Middle' class" habit to casually give your kid a new car. Unless the advance on the book was a truly astronomical amount I think if parents wanted to use the money for their kid it would have been wiser to put it, say, into a college fund. So unless the new McFlys were financially irresponsible, we can safely assume they were a bit above "Upper Middle Class".
edit: Just for fun, asked chatGPT
Sure!
Yes, in 1985, the **Toyota Hilux SR5 4x4** was considered a fairly expensive vehicle, especially for someone like Marty McFly.
Here’s why:
1. **Price** – In 1985, a brand-new Toyota Hilux SR5 4x4 cost between **$11,000 and $14,000** (which is about **$30,000–$40,000 today**, adjusted for inflation). It wasn’t exactly cheap for a high school student!
2. **Status Symbol** – In the ’80s, 4x4 pickup trucks were becoming very popular in the U.S., especially among young people and off-road enthusiasts. A Hilux like Marty’s, with a roll bar, auxiliary lights, and chrome wheels, was definitely seen as a cool ride!
3. **Who Paid for It?** – In the movie, the altered timeline makes Marty’s father, George, wealthy and successful, so he likely bought the truck as a gift for Marty. In the original timeline, Marty wanted it but probably couldn’t afford it.
So, for the average teenager, that Toyota would have been a pretty expensive and out-of-reach dream!![]()
I wish people would stop saying that.
BTTF is NOT saying that wealth brings happiness. Yes, the McFlys ARE richer (not rich, just richER) in the new tiimeline. But that's irrelevant.
Exactly. As if it were impossible to imagine someone being happy AND not having material possessions to prove it.The 1980s visual and subconscious language--with that era's emphasis on material gain--was not left up to interpretation at the end of the film.The filmmakers could not conceive of a Marty who had a stronger father / family unit, yet they were in the same economic class as in the original timeline--as if any sort of personal strength, integrity and psychological stability was impossible to find within a lower economic class (well, not for those who actively pushed the glory of the Upwardly Mobile across 1980s media). No, that was not attempted, because to too many in 1980s media, happiness was synonymous with material gain, as in the coda of BTTF.
What era has NOT had an emphasis on material gain? The 70's emphasized gaining as much material as one could, which was admittedly not as much. If anything the 80's emphasized "Oh my stars and garters, we have MONEY again!"The 1980s visual and subconscious language--with that era's emphasis on material gain
I had classmates who got Camaros pretty much just like that. They were the kids who had Sony Walkmans.And again, no one is going to convince me that it was an absolutely common thing in the 80s to give a brand new pick-up truck to a teenage son as if it were a bicycle.
For me it felt like 'these are still fundimentally the same people, but they got what amounts to Therapy to re-rail their lives before those lives had a chance to go horribly wrong.'His love and family aren't "lost." His family is healthier and happier, which tends to lead to longer life, which means he may well have more family than he had before. Meanwhile, his family loves him, and while there may be moments of awkwardness due to mismatched memories, remember, he's still just a high schooler with his life ahead of him. (And it's not as though parents tend to mind reminiscing over family memories with their kids, so his work of getting caught up to speed doesn't have to be unpleasant or fraught.) Heck, one could plausibly argue that, given that his family is happier and healthier, it would be selfish of him to wish he'd returned to the exact same reality as before.
I've never bought that his parents would have absolutely recognized him from a memory 30 years ago.why and how NOBODY has been able to find Calvin after the night of the dance thus likely turning it into a hill valley urban legend
Thats awesome. I've never thought about it that way. Its the 1985-A future..... no one else disappears when they get stuck in a wrong future. So why would Biff? If he beat the ripple effect back to the future, he should have still had it reform around him, and he would be taking the place of mobster Biff - who is now dead. Genius.
Could've sworn I'd seen either a TV documentary or some interview where the intent was that lauraine shot him in the 1985A timeline and when eh got to the future the ripple caught up with him and poof.It's actually quite unclear what happens to your current alternate version when you appear in their timeline. 1985A Doc is institutionalized and 1985A Marty is at boarding school, so they can just ignore the issue all together.
I've never bought that his parents would have absolutely recognized him from a memory 30 years ago.
But "urban legend"? I LOVE that.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.