For goodness' sake, of course he wouldn't.TOS Spock (outside of the Pon-Farr) would not kill innocents to achieve his goals, or expose others to his own problems, just to satisfy some off kilter, slapped together worldview of utopia.
For goodness' sake, of course he wouldn't.TOS Spock (outside of the Pon-Farr) would not kill innocents to achieve his goals, or expose others to his own problems, just to satisfy some off kilter, slapped together worldview of utopia.
TOS Spock (outside of the Pon-Farr) would not kill innocents to achieve his goals, or expose others to his own problems, just to satisfy some off kilter, slapped together worldview of utopia.
For goodness' sake, of course he wouldn't.
While Spock's explanation of why anyone would seek the opposite of planned, artfully balanced communities was clear, his turning Sevrin's crew into a mirror of his own experiences was out of character, since:
- By that time in TOS' history, Spock hardly felt like an outsider and was (in his way) genuinely warm with his core Enterprise crew; the distance (and frustration with it) he expressed in "The Naked Time" was long gone.
- Moreover, thanks to beginning to restore a good relationship with his father while in the company of humans, he was more open as a person, and jettisoned yet another personal chain that once held him down among humans. The 1701 humans (his circle) are as fiercely loyal to him as he is to that core group; they are aware of it, and he is, too, so he's not the isolated side show that Sevrin and his followers were.
TOS Spock (outside of the Pon-Farr) would not kill innocents to achieve his goals, or expose others to his own problems, just to satisfy some off kilter, slapped together worldview of utopia.
Perhaps, but Spock's affiliation with the "One" movement was related as something from his past, so it fits fine regardless.
But the episode conveyed that in general, there was nothing wrong with the One'ers and they shouldn't be discouraged from seeking their goals. It was Severin who was a self-serving sociopath leading them astray.
If true, then it would have been more constructive to illustrate his progress--just how far he had come (since his past years) to be a full, comfortable member of an alien (human) society, while not completely giving up his personal heritage or philosophies. That would have--at least--told Sevrin's group that anarchy and self segregation was not necessary to live and flourish in a society.
Sevrin's followers agreed with it--from breaking him out of confinement, taking control of the ship, to Togo Rad's quick acceptance of the ultrasonic attack's lethal effect (after mentioning its effect not as warning, but as a statement of fact), the followers were misguided.
2. The appearance of Lt. Palmer and the extensive scenes in Auxiliary Control bring remembrances of much happier times in the Star Trek universe, but there's not much else to recommend it. Like "Spock's Brain," this episode may not be quite as notoriously bad as it's reputed to be, but there are still a lot of things that just make me wince when I see them--especially the 'musical' happenings. While it might not be "worst episode of all time" bad, it still is bad. Quite bad. Really quite bad.
Yes, a mini pooper. Perfect description of this episode.Star Trek plus Hippies it's so Sixties what is there not to like? If only they had found a way to get a Mini Cooper in it would have been perfect.![]()
While Spock's explanation of why anyone would seek the opposite of planned, artfully balanced communities was clear, his turning Sevrin's crew into a mirror of his own experiences was out of character, since:
- By that time in TOS' history, Spock hardly felt like an outsider and was (in his way) genuinely warm with his core Enterprise crew; the distance (and frustration with it) he expressed in "The Naked Time" was long gone.
- Moreover, thanks to beginning to restore a good relationship with his father while in the company of humans, he was more open as a person, and jettisoned yet another personal chain that once held him down among humans. The 1701 humans (his circle) are as fiercely loyal to him as he is to that core group; they are aware of it, and he is, too, so he's not the isolated side show that Sevrin and his followers were.
Or cut-throat-ee, to Khan ...Now McCoy, there's your real cut-throat.![]()
I think there was some schtick about one of the Hippies being the son of an important diplomat so he could not be put into custody.1. Potentially dangerous "guests" being allowed free reign of the ship.
2. A control room staffed by one inattentive person and not guarded in any way.
What could possibly go wrong?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.