• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Enterprise E. What made it different than Enterprise D?

Except this very thing was not mentioned.

We know that these things called "ramscoops" exist. We know they can suck and blow. But there is never any suggestion that this would be related to the ship getting extra energy, or collecting extra fuel. For all we know, the scoops exist for clearing a path through interstellar space, and for that reason are vital gear for not just every ship, but for every engine.
Timo Saloniemi

Voyager used the Bussard collectors ramscoops to collect radiogenic isotopes from Vaadwaur planetary atmosphere and use them as a power source.
They were also used to gather Sirilium from a class 17 nebula, and plasma particles from astral eddies.
On all 3 occasions Voyager used them as a way to supplement the ships power.

Enterprise-D used them on 2 occasions to release specific elements.

Enterprise-E used them to collect the metreon gas from the Briar patch to help them in subduing So'Na ships (well, the So'Na pretty much did it to themselves when they fired on the gas the Enterprise released).

So, yes, the Bussard collectors can pick up and blow out matter (or filter specific elements from collected matter), however that doesn't appear to be their sole function... seeing that we DO have some observational data which can support the premise they aid in creating extra energy for the ship - so the statement wouldn't be incorrect (technically speaking).

We have no direct observational data (at least nothing from on-screen evidence) which suggests the collectors clear path through interstellar space (the main deflector dish is what moves interstellar dust etc. away from the ship).
 
I guess the point is that whenever the Bussards get used for sucking in X, for all values of X, the heroes treat this as a fantastic new idea.

Which would be consistent with

a) sucking not being the design intent behind the machines
b) sucking of something else than X being the design intent

Perhaps these things do suck interstellar hydrogen after all, despite this never getting a mention?

(As for "Dragon's Teeth", Janeway doesn't specify "Bussards" or "ramscoops" or "collectors". Instead, she micromanages the opening of "ports" and "reversing of pressure gradient", an apparently highly unusual procedure that might well bypass the ramscoops altogether.)

Timo Saloniemi
 
Do you mean in an Okudagram or a production sketch?

No, in visuals. Which is the only reason we have for believing that there are ramscoops on Kirk's ship, too.

The point being, absolutely nothing separates Cochrane's rig from Kirk's starship there. And a glowing curved shape at the front end of a nacelle would appear to be the one and only thing common to all Starfleet ships: many lack a saucer, a deflector, nacelles and pylons etc, but all have the domes. And only the TMP style of engine lacks the glow, but now we learn from DS9 and LDS that the glow can be there on certain flight modes anyway...

They’ve always been nice to have, but what if they were in fact more critical when antimatter was only a way of jump starting this access to “space energy”, and the collectors later remained as a kind of vestigial element of the sink, long after every ship had been retrofitted with the TNG style system, which was in fact an evolution of drives from the ENT and FC eras? Antimatter scarcity being no longer an issue, it turned out the original system enabled improved control over power generation relative to the unpredictable space-energy drive.

It would help if we had a reason to believe in the space-energy thing - especially the "unpredictable" part of it. Yet warp is warp everywhere, there being no "highways" even if there are rare "speed bumps".

I’m sure that everything in Star Trek V, VI and VII works pretty much the way we expect from TNG, but I can’t say that with confidence for the earlier films or series.

Oh, I'll go in the other direction and argue that there is always a ST:ID type of sphere at the heart of the warp power system. It just gets smaller with time, in relative terms, so that in TNG we have this fancy oven in the middle of shirtsleeves Main Engineering, with feeds from above and below, while back in TOS and the TOS movies we had a giant of a ball belowdecks, with just the output shafts emerging from the zone of lethal radiation to the coveralls-safe zone and never protruding into the shirtsleeves zone.

It's quite possible to argue TOS and the early TOS movies were different from TNG, because little of their tech is described in detail (that is, in principle). But we now know the tech of ENT was the same as TNG, so "different" would need to mean "a brief experiment". Which might not be quite as attractive as "evolution".

Timo Saloniemi
 
I guess the point is that whenever the Bussards get used for sucking in X, for all values of X, the heroes treat this as a fantastic new idea.

Which would be consistent with

a) sucking not being the design intent behind the machines
b) sucking of something else than X being the design intent

Perhaps these things do suck interstellar hydrogen after all, despite this never getting a mention?

(As for "Dragon's Teeth", Janeway doesn't specify "Bussards" or "ramscoops" or "collectors". Instead, she micromanages the opening of "ports" and "reversing of pressure gradient", an apparently highly unusual procedure that might well bypass the ramscoops altogether.)

Timo Saloniemi

The bussard collectors do make it easier to collect matter or virtually any kind of particle so it can be processed and used as a power source, but they also do filter out the stuff so you can collect what you need and shove it into the systems.

In case of 'Dragon's Teeth', Janeway said the following:
"Damned if we do, damned if we don't. Open the forward nacelle ports and reverse the pressure gradient. Take in six hundred kilograms."

I can't think of any other 'ports' on the nacelles that might be placed on the forward section of the nacelles and serve a different function than the bussard collectors.
She might not necessarily call them bussard collectors in that given moment either... and would she have to?
Ramscoops, collectors, or ports... might be interchangeable terms which are applicable to a given situation.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top