What I gathered was that the Though this schematic from Drexler shows the Main Engineering deck to be below the pylons...
http://drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/1701-cutaway/
RAMA
Thanks a million credits, RAMA, for that link.
The
Responses to “1701 Cutaway” are a great read, discussing many of the issues raised here.
By the way, while I'm in this thread, it's a good time to paste something I posted on another board, now offline.
Forewords I and II of the Technical Manual provide its back-story. I believe a fair interpretation of these Forewords is that a version of the Technical Manual was transmitted into an Earth military computer at Omaha during the events of Tomorrow is Yesterday. The datasheets are passed on to Franz Joseph when the military declares the incident a hoax. Starfleet decides that to safeguard the timeline, it may become necessary to delete information relating to advanced technology, or to correct information that was distorted during transmission, but further that the determination of what data to alter will be made in the course of time. This is both an apology and a disclaimer by Joseph: Inaccurate information may not yet have been corrected, or deemed by Starfleet to be unworthy of or inappropriate for correction; missing information is that which might affect the timeline, and so on. Franz Joseph is basically saying that the Technical Manual should be taken with two Feinbergers’ worth of salt.
If faster-than-light propulsion ain't something that might pollute the timeline, I don't know what is. We can simply say that Starfleet sabotaged the depiction of the warp technology in our copy of the Tech Manual. And Drexler's design is what they were hiding from us.
I'm gonna support Drexler's design, at least in the broad strokes, not only because it's "cannon", having been on-screen, which by the way is not in and of itself decisive, but especially because he consulted Matt Jeffries for the placement of Main Engineering. Furthermore, Drexler's design is a brilliant merging of TOS and TMP, introducing the "power transfer conduit" to TOS, and giving us a reasonable interpretation of "the pipes". It even fits with
TAS: One of Our Planets is Missing.
Very well done, Doug Drexler!
Greg Tyler's article is also well thought out. (One request: I think he should revise it to include the page numbers from
The Making of Star Trek.) But I think the conduit pipes aiming towards the pylons is a great idea. Nothing leans around the secondary hull like those pylons, even though the pipes have to cross on the way up to fit there.