• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

End of the World

How will the world end

  • Alien invasion

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Climate chane

    Votes: 3 7.3%
  • Nuclear war

    Votes: 6 14.6%
  • Death of the sun

    Votes: 19 46.3%
  • Pandemic

    Votes: 2 4.9%
  • Nuclear accident

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Asteroids

    Votes: 2 4.9%
  • Super Volcano

    Votes: 3 7.3%
  • AI

    Votes: 4 9.8%
  • Bio Terror

    Votes: 2 4.9%

  • Total voters
    41

hux

Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Channel 4 (UK) did an interesting End of the World" night where scientists looked at and discussed the various ways humanity might be destroyed. They looked at 10 choices (heavily influenced by movies)

Professor Stephen Hawking reckons any genuine AI would inevitably and eventually destroy us

what do you think?
 
Brawndo's got electrolytes!

(NSFW)
[yt]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hL1-340ODCM[/yt]
 
Weird. Just a few minutes ago I had to contain an unexplainable urge to post a poll asking when the world will end. I was planning to give a wide variety of options: This week, this month, this year, by the end of the decade.

In light of my unposted troll poll, my answer to this one is obvious: iWatch.


I'm at optimistic, so I'm going with Death of the Sun.
Technically, the sun will roast us long before that. We are going uninhabitable in a few hundred million years IIRC. That might help explain the lack of aliens – we developed spaceflight and radio near the planned end of life of our planet. Maybe the other multicellular lifeforms didn't invent the wheel before their planet got too hot.

Aside from that, a pandemic and bio terror are the only two that can take out the entire human race. Asteroid collisions are also capable, but we will be able to deflect them, and nothing big enough is expected to come our way. It is likely that no asteroid impact that will happen will wipe us out.

Maybe the aliens too... But only because they are so unpredictable that we don't even know if they exist.

ETA: And if a pandemic kills us, the civilization might get a second chance. People living with little or no contact with the rest of it will survive and will be able to restart it. I think there are enough of them to expect finds of the empty cities to follow at some point. That will drive them to repeat what was there. If that fails, I am counting on elephants.
 
"End of the World" and a human extinction event are two different things. Out of all your options, only the Sun option has any relevance to the planet's destruction. As to the end of man, it will be his ignorance, not his intelligence, that's kills him.
 
Evolution will take care of man. No reason the sophisticated neural system can't be thrown off over a million or so years for something less destructive to the species.
 
"End of the World" and a human extinction event are two different things. Out of all your options, only the Sun option has any relevance to the planet's destruction. As to the end of man, it will be his ignorance, not his intelligence, that's kills him.

As Frank Zappa once said (in "Dumb All Over") regarding the fate of the Earth vs. Humanity's possible fate at their (our?) own hands:
"I mean it won't blow up
'n disappear
It'll just look ugly
For a thousand years..."
 
"End of the World" and a human extinction event are two different things. Out of all your options, only the Sun option has any relevance to the planet's destruction. As to the end of man, it will be his ignorance, not his intelligence, that's kills him.

Thanks for taking part. Don't forget to pick up your...."i'm a fun person who doesn't take things too seriously"....goody bag on the way out

I voted for Super Volcano because it sounds cool.

I prefer to think that there will be a combination of events. Super volcano followed by asteroids then super awesome AI will enslave us (before finally being destroyed themselves by an alien invasion)
 
Last edited:
Depends on how you look at it. The end of the world might be inevitable in one way or another or it could also be seen as a transition..transition into space and away from the Earth for example, or from fossil fuels to fusion and renewables, or instead of an AI apocalypse it could be an AI transformation of the human race if done correctly. Everyone seems keen on thinking in the box. Humanity has little room to expand it's thinking but it'll have to eventually.

RAMA
 
I prefer to think that there will be a combination of events. Super volcano followed by asteroids then super awesome AI will enslave us (before finally being destroyed themselves by an alien invasion)

Wow, I had a flash to one of those dream sequences from the comic strip CALVIN AND HOBBES.

snowsaur.gif


calvin-and-hobbes-snowmen-art.jpg
 
"Calvin and Hobbs" reign supreme!

Man and Woman will survive.
The World will end when the Sun blows up.
We will be long gone to other places in the cosmos by then.

Did I hear something about "Goodie Bags" for participating?...
 
Technically, the sun will roast us long before [it dies]. We are going uninhabitable in a few hundred million years....If that fails, I am counting on elephants.
Interesting to find someone who is aware that current astrophysical models of stellar evolution do in fact predict that a star gets steadily brighter long before it leaves the main sequence. Of course that leaves the reasonable amount of doubt regarding how well our models portray whatever is actually taking place in the sky. Despite the heavy mathematization of physics and Stephen Hawking's assurances of the arrival of "precision cosmology," I see little reason to think we've heard the last word on this subject.

But "a few hundred million years" is quite a while. We have an extremely foreshortened view of natural history because the recent past is seen at higher temporal resolution than the remote past is. This motivates us to attach way too much importance to the human species and its civilizations in the overall scheme of things. It has also led us to assume that human beings, and life as we understand it today, are the final stage in evolution: Otherwise we wouldn't ask about how we will respond to the impending asteroid impact or the sun's death, while simultaneously overrating the lethality of pandemics.

Pandemics are hardly fun. But they don't destroy a widespread species too easily. Even if a lightning airborne disease killed 99% of today's population; some 70 million survivors would be left behind, more people than our planet hosted during the reign of Egypt's Amenemhat I. And these survivors would likely have natural resistance to the pathogen. Real pandemics such as the Black Death and Spanish Flu killed only a small fraction of the world population, never coming close to threatening an extinction.

Meanwhile, huge asteroid impacts of the sort that ended the dinosaurs occur so infrequently we will likely have disappeared or evolved into something unrecognizable by the time the next one comes. Of course there's always the risk. But even if it happened right now, would humanity die out? Many types of advanced life, including crocodiles, survived the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs. We are considerably more adaptable than any reptile. I would bet not only on species survival, but that we might rebuild civilization after an impact unless it's big enough to extinguish all multicellular life.

Extinction itself can be somewhat illusory. After all, some dinosaur lineages still have living descendants: We call them birds.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top