Yeah, the fact you are running about with a quake like shotgun did not help the games overal feel. Lol^Same, though unlike EF1 I don't think I ever completed this one. Not sure I even got half way though. It's been quite a while but if memory serves it got a bit boring after the initial few levels.
EF1 was fun because it felt like a Star Trek game. IIRC EF2 felt like a slightly better looking generic action shooter with a Star Trek skin. Making up a new enemy just for the game was actually counter-productive since most of the novelty was in fighting Borg and other such familiar baddies.I don't understand why people say EF1 is better than EF2. To me, EF2 had a better story, more interesting gameplay, and a much better final boss.
I get that, but the first one also had a new enemy. I do prefer the Voyager setting of the first game and the fact that it has the whole cast as opposed the the second game where it just has Picard and Barclay, but overall I preferred the second one.EF1 was fun because it felt like a Star Trek game. IIRC EF2 felt like a slightly better looking generic action shooter with a Star Trek skin. Making up a new enemy just for the game was actually counter-productive since most of the novelty was in fighting Borg and other such familiar baddies.
I know there was a lawsuit for those reasons. I hadn't heard that it made the game hard to get. This is probably part of the reason there hasn't been a really high quality Trek game since.I really liked EF2, a worthy sequel to the original. As I recall (and my memory is hazy, please correct the details), it was hard to get hold of due to a lawsuit between Activision and Paramount? Basically that Paramount tanked the Trek franchise with Nemesis and ENT, and thus Activision's expensive Star Trek license wasn't getting the returns they were expecting.
I actually thought the second one had more of a overall Trek universe feel to it. We got stuff missions at Starfleet Academy, on a new Starfleet ship, we fought Borg, Romulans, Klingons, Andorians, and dealt with a Ferengi. I thought the story of 2 was also better, the whole thing with the ship graveyard in 1 was a nice way to bring in Klingons and the MU, but overall I though the story for 2 was more interesting, and gave us more interesting guest characters.EF1 was fun because it felt like a Star Trek game. IIRC EF2 felt like a slightly better looking generic action shooter with a Star Trek skin. Making up a new enemy just for the game was actually counter-productive since most of the novelty was in fighting Borg and other such familiar baddies.
Like I said though, it's been ages so my memory is very fuzzy and I really don't have much of an intelligent opinion. All I know is abck when it came out, it didn't hold my interest for very long, while I really enjoyed the first one.
I also liked the fact that there were some dialog options. In fact, you had the romance options where you choose between the Human officer and the alien archaeologist, it's Mass Effect 1!I played both of them, and I actually liked the second one better.
I actually thought the second one had more of a overall Trek universe feel to it. We got stuff missions at Starfleet Academy, on a new Starfleet ship, we fought Borg, Romulans, Klingons, Andorians, and dealt with a Ferengi. I thought the story of 2 was also better, the whole thing with the ship graveyard in 1 was a nice way to bring in Klingons and the MU, but overall I though the story for 2 was more interesting, and gave us more interesting guest characters.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.