But in this case, it doesn't make sense to have Worf using it against Duras.
Yes, Duras was respected by the Klingons and yet he was a scoundrel and a coward. Isn't that telling?He would be fighting the man who'd family took Worf's family's honor. Also it would probably have an effect on others who heard of this, since Duras was a respected member of the High Council. It would make an impression to have one of the High Council killed with an honor blade by a man who is an outcast to Klingon society.
...
The humans, on the other hand, were just not respected at all by the Klingons, nor would killing one with a blade of honor impress anyone in Klingon society. Only when a few Starfleet captains start to become worthy foes would it seem likely the Klingons would thing it worthy to kill them with a honor blade. But, having see the primary one (Kirk) fight, I doubt they would be willing to give him that honor, because he'd probably use it to his advantage....Kirk does that sort of thing, from a Klingon point of view. He is a devil after all.
Well, Klingons never use swords against the Federation in any episode other than "Way of the Warrior". They do use daggers, which are easily carried.Having the Bat'leth be an honor sword, it might make sense why the Klingons didn't use them against the Federation in the past.
In this case, Duras wouldn't have so much gain to use tradition. What he needed was a weapon who could make him win, not a weapon to humiliate Worf. So, Duras was surely more skilled with the "common" sword than the Bat'leth.Duras would be for modern life. Tradition is, at best, something to be used for his gain.
[...]
The other option is that Worf might be more skilled with the Bat'leth than any of his other weapons
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.