• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

DuckTales reboot coming to Disney XD in 2017

"Normal is overrated."

That there is the very essence of this show. By demonstrating the triplets embrace of Webby's weird quirks, the series shows to kids of all ages (including us adults set in our ways) that not only is it okay to be different, it's a strong and positive quality.

It's also cool that they didn't have the boys reluctant to play with a girl, and that they even invited her on their own initiative (or at least one of them did).

But why was Webby so impressed about a dog in a bowtie... when the bus driver she was talking to was also a dog? But then, Disney's always drawn a distinction between its anthropomorphic animals and its conventional animals (cf. Goofy vs. Pluto, or all the cartoons about Donald hunting fowl). Despite the use of avian surnames like Duck, McDuck, McQuack, Vanderquack, Beakley, and Beagle, the anthropomorphic-animal characters seem to think of themselves as human, e.g. when Gyro told the vending machine "I am Man, you are Machine." Then again, both Beakley and Beagle are actual human surnames. (As is Duckworth. Is he even in this show?)

I also kinda liked it that Donald was at least trying to respect Beakley's wishes and address her complaints, just doing so ineptly. It's an improvement on the classic angry and hostile Donald. I still need to turn on captions when he talks, though.


Margo Martindale as Ma Beagle is inspired casting, just as I figured she would be (and not just because of Justified).

I have no idea who she is, and I didn't find her performance all that impressive. So far I think the most impressive voice actor other than David Tennant is Kate Micucci (did I get that right?) as Webby.


Four episodes in and there's already plenty of stories to mine for and we haven't even met Magika, Goldie, or Gizmoduck (or even Fenton) yet.

But we did get foreshadowing of Gizmoduck, with Gyro initiating "Project Blatherskite."

When Louie so casually snatched the #1 Dime out of the case, I was wondering, what about all the security systems Scrooge keeps around that dime to keep Magica from stealing it? Learning that it was a decoy helped a bit, but still, you'd think that if he wanted the decoy to be convincing, he'd still put a ton of security around it.

Anyway, I thought both episodes were very funny and had some good character work too. The animation and music may not be quite as good as the original, I'm still not entirely sold on the voices, but the writing is probably better than the original's.
 
It's also cool that they didn't have the boys reluctant to play with a girl, and that they even invited her on their own initiative (or at least one of them did).
Yeah, that was a nice touch as well. As I said in my previous review, I'm very happy she has gone from passive annoyance to a gung-ho adventuress who pushes the triplets around. This episode went a little further and established her own idiosyncrasies, but not ones that hold her back as a strong female character.

And yes, you spelled Kate Micucci's name correctly.

I have no idea who she is, and I didn't find her performance all that impressive.
:eek:

You need to watch The Americans, Justified, and The Riches, and then BoJack Horseman. Margo Martindale is simply one of the finest character actors in television right now (just look at BoJack Horseman where she plays Character Actress Margo Martindale).

But we did get foreshadowing of Gizmoduck, with Gyro initiating "Project Blatherskite."
Yeah, I made that connection after I made that post. I hope we'll get a few episodes of Fenton as just Fenton before introducing Gizmoduck like the original series did.
 
Ah, well. That's childhood memories playing tricks on me. I could've sworn he appeared in multiple episodes before becoming Gizmoduck. Technically I am right, but just not in the way I thought.

Still, I do hope in this series does that.
 
When I saw the canine girl (whom we first saw at the interview and later as a reporter in the premiere) on the bus, I wondered if she might wind up being something of a running gag, appearing in every episode, possibly in different vocations, but never saying a word. But I didn't see her in the second of today's two episodes (the lucky dime story), so there goes that expectation out the window. Okay, I admit it; I find her cute with those introspective, downcast eyes.
 
Ah, well. That's childhood memories playing tricks on me. I could've sworn he appeared in multiple episodes before becoming Gizmoduck. Technically I am right, but just not in the way I thought.

Still, I do hope in this series does that.
If you can find Volume 3 of the DVD releases, the episodes are on there. Unfortunately they are in their syndicated form, not their original 2-hour form. (Super Ducktales is actually the last 5 episodes on the set.)
 
Unfortunately they are in their syndicated form, not their original 2-hour form.

I wouldn't call that unfortunate, since the multipart-episode versions have additional content that isn't in the movie versions. After all, the movies aired in 2-hour blocks (i.e. c. 88 minutes of content), while the episodes aired in five 30-minute blocks (i.e. c. 110 minutes of content). Even if you subtract a couple of minutes per episode for the repeated main and end titles and the recaps, that still requires maybe c. 10-15 minutes of additional story content.

I always had the impression that they were produced as 5-parters with enough "expendable" material that they could be easily cut down into "movie" form, given that each episode tells its own distinct segment of the saga. So if anything, the syndicated 5-parter form is the original version, as well as the more complete one.
 
Another fun, if basic episode. I'm really enjoying the focus on Webby and exploring her relationship (or lack thereof) with the triplets. The introduction of Lena was good development for Webby, even if it turned out Lena is Magica's niece and easily manipulated into Webby's trust. Hopefully, Lena's clear disenchantment with family will cause her to eventually turn against Magika. Nice to hear Kimiko Glenn pop up on the show for a reoccurring role. I've loved her since Orange is the New Black.

I didn't expect to see the Beagle Boys to pop up so quickly, especially without bothering with the preamble of Ma and the big three breaking out of jail after last week's capture. Not that I'm complaining because it's always wonderful to have Margo Martindale around. I like the idea of having a variety of different Beagle trios, even if most of them are forgettable aside from the Tumblebums, who were legitimately creepy. They're the only group I would be interested in seeing again (aside from Ma and the big three, of course).
 
Last edited:
Sooo...am I the only one who is still watching? Shame because this show is so much fun.

Another great adventure, this time traipsing in the underworld of Duckburg and a nice take on scientific versus myth, known versus unknown, with a twist (albeit a predictable one) of the "monsters" being just as scared of our heroes as they were of the monsters.

I was greatly by Launchpad's misguided fears of mole people, spurred on by a scary movie, leading to him convincing himself that he was a mole person himself as a defense mechanism. I also enjoyed Louie's sidebar enjoyment of Webby and Huey's arguments about facts and fiction, complete with him tearing up at the end when the two came together to face their fears.

Nice to see that Lena continues to be around as a lead up to Magica's eventual appearance and I'm intrigued that she is magical herself (at least with the use of the amulet). I'm still hoping that she will see the "light" and turn against her aunt in the end.

The only downside about this episode is this is the second episode in a row without a single scene of Scrooge. I've enjoyed the triplets and Webby (and Lena now) having their own adventures, but Scrooge needs to be part of the fun, too.

Edit: Forgot to mention that I love the fact Catherine Tate is Magica!
 
Last edited:
It's pretty fun, but you're right, this should be Scrooge's show, not just the nephews' and Webby's.

Also, they're showing the episodes out of order (this is episode 110 but it's the sixth one aired, counting the pilot as two), and it shows here -- Lena was talking about how these guys are well-known as this globetrotting "adventure family" and this was just a walk in the park for them, but so far every episode except part 2 of the premiere has been set entirely in Duckburg, with no adventures except the trouble the kids have gotten themselves into (two clashes with the Beagle Boys and one set of antics within Scrooge's Money Bin).
 
That's what the reviewer of A.V. Club said, but honestly, I don't see any issues with the order (at least in this episode). Those references could easily be to unseen adventures, just as Doctor Who does. Unless, of course, those references actually connect to the episodes that have been made and we haven't seen yet.
 
That's what the reviewer of A.V. Club said, but honestly, I don't see any issues with the order (at least in this episode). Those references could easily be to unseen adventures, just as Doctor Who does.

Yes, of course, that's the whole problem -- that they're unseen. New viewers who aren't familiar with the mythos or the original series, who only have the six episodes so far to go on (which presumably would be true for most of the children who are the show's target audience), would be confused by Lena's reference to something she treats as a well-known fact but that the show so far has almost totally failed to demonstrate. The difference is that Doctor Who has earned the luxury to refer to unseen adventures because those references are just reinforcing a pattern that the show has already thoroughly established.

Unless you're referring to the 1963 first-season episodes where the Doctor and Susan talked about adventures they'd had before meeting Ian and Barbara. But that wouldn't work as a comparison here, because prior to the series premiere, it would've just been Scrooge and Donald that were going on (separate) adventures, not the whole family as a unit. Heck, Webby was rarely even out of the mansion until three episodes ago.
 
Fair enough. I can see how that can be problematic for the target audience. I personally don't mind but I'm just one viewer.

I did mean Doctor Who in general, but I agree that Doctor Who earned that luxury over time. As for those unseen adventures of The First Doctor and Susan, we actually did eventually see the one Susan referred to directly in Edge of Destruction in the Big Finish audio play Quinnis.
 
"You never had the common sense to give up before, why start now?!"

There we go, Scrooge is back in the shenanigans, with more focus on him over the triplets and Webby. I would've enjoyed Gladstone if he hadn't been voiced by Paul F. Tomkins. The whole time I kept hearing Mr. Peanutbutter (my least favorite character on Bojack Horseman), especially whenever Gladstone bragged about his luck. Still, it was a fun adventure that put Donald in positive light.

I liked how the episode subverted expectations that the Temple of the Golden Cricket was suppose to be grand adventure, but instead dueling Toad Liu Hai in the House of Good Fortune turned out to be the real adventure while the Temple was a let down. I also liked the hints to Launchpad's unseen adventure. I hope we see more of that in the future.
 
One odd detail: The musical motif for Toad Liu Hai was strikingly similar to Ron Jones’s Beagle Boys theme from the original DuckTales. Maybe a subtle hint that he was up to no good? If so, it’s a pretty odd one. (And it just underlines my regret that they didn’t bring Jones back to score the show. His music was my favorite thing about the original.)

Entertaining, but I feel the show could use more straight-up adventure and less family sitcom, or at least a better balance of the two. This one was more about hinting at adventure and then sidetracking us from it as a deconstructive joke (as with the gag of Launchpad having his own epic adventure off-camera).

As for Gladstone's voice actor, he's not someone I'm familiar with. I looked over his filmography, and it seems I've seen him in guest roles on one or two things, but he's not a name or a voice that means anything to me, so I didn't have an issue with him here.
 
It was less to do with Tomkins himself and more to do with how much I can't stand Mr. Peanutbutter.
 
Well, today's episode was pretty lame. The A-plot was an inane lesson on "millennial ADD laziness" which really didn't serve much of a purpose. The B-plot was somewhat amusing but it didn't really go anywhere and there wasn't enough to justify even a B-plot. The only truly amusing moment: "Although you've tried to kill me countless times which usually ends up more annoying than deadly." Which itself is a sad commentary on the episode.

I previously liked the mix of the relatively mundane and the adventurous, but this has gotten ridiculous. Let's stick to proper adventures now.
 
It was less to do with Tomkins himself and more to do with how much I can't stand Mr. Peanutbutter.

I specifically love Mr. Peanutbutter for how much I can't stand him. Haven't caught the latest episode, but I thought him as Gladstone was pretty fun! Mainly, again, because of how much I couldn't stand him. Paul F. Tompkins just has a great 'annoying nice guy' voice.
 
I'd heard about the Mark Beaks character, but I'd thought the idea was to contrast his modern tech-guru culture with Scrooge's old-fashioned business mogul approach. But the pattern of marginalizing Scrooge continued -- he was basically just the audience for Glomgold's ranting while the Beaks story unfolded separately.

Also, the show is still riding too much on the assumption of long-standing relationships and patterns that it hasn't actually made much of an effort to establish first. The line about Glomgold trying to kill Scrooge countless times would've been funnier if it had come later in the series and we'd seen more than one previous clash between the two. (This was made as #108, and the only previously made episode that hasn't aired yet is #104.) Sometimes it seems the show is written for older fans who already know these characters from the original show and will get all the in-jokes and familiar character beats, but that clashes with the fact that it focuses mainly on the younger characters and goes for a lighter, funnier style for youth appeal. It can't seem to make up its mind who its audience is, or whether it wants to be a reboot or a sequel.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top