• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Dr. Hugh Culber Despite Yourself Spoilers!

Can we not be so annoyingly political that we start having a scoreboard tally of what kind of people are dying on the show?

God, you guys could take the fun out of just about anything...hahaha!
Too much now is about identity this identity that. It's auguring individual thought into a chasm. You can't simply be, think, and appreciate when trying to fit a predetermined caste and subsequently nurture and defend it.
 
No. When they brag about the diversity, they're asking for it. They bragged having the first female captain & first officer duo, then they kill the captain (and demote the first officer.) Then they brag having an openly gay couple, only to kill one of them.

In some other show it would be unfortunate, but not a big deal. But it is a big deal here, at least to me.
They didn't brag about that, SMG bragged about it, at which point people pointed to Janeway and rightly mocked her for it.
 
and one is coming back.
That still seems to be unclear. They could have been talking about flashbacks, recorded messages, visions, emotional impact etc. There was similar talk regarding Georgiou.

But I hope you're right.
 
Season 2 is back to exploring from what I heard with the war over, going to be a typical TOS I assume.
 
They didn't brag about that, SMG bragged about it, at which point people pointed to Janeway and rightly mocked her for it.
Janeway had a female first officer? Also, I doubt the actors are not told what talking points to bring up during interviews.
 
I'm guessing what happened is the writers/showrunners thought it was a great idea to kill Culber off, but by the time someone (probably the actors) told them it was a bad idea (due to the "bury your gays" trope) it was too late to modify the story. So they're going to awkwardly make him come back in the future.
Well, Stamets is in sick bay with dead Culber, and Stamets is looking very Gary Mitchell-like, and Gary Mitchell had God-like powers...

...so there’s that.

HOWEVER, If they do bring him back, it was most likely the plan all along, and will happen soon, and maybe the way I described above. I doubt they killed Culber off and then only later decide to bring him back because of worrying about backlash for killing off a gay character.
 
Last edited:
I'll just leave this here (also posted on the episode thread):
We saw this Dr. Culber get presumably killed by Tyler but could we see Dr. Culber again? Is this really the end?

Yes. We will see Dr. Culber again. This is an epic love story. Yes. You will be experiencing highs and lows, triumphs and disappoints as you would in any relationship. And what we’re doing is inviting you to go on the journey of this relationship and the roller coaster ride that it is. And this is just one chapter in their story. And where we’re going to take you, I think, is incredibly exciting. And this had to happen in order for us to go there.

So, you know, what we’re all doing, what we’re doing now is asking the audience to trust us. This is not a bury your gays, kill your gays trope storyline. This is a chapter in this relationship and even Paul and Hugh have no idea what’s about to go down. And, you know, I give people permission to be sad on Sunday, I think that’s appropriate. I think we will all go through some stages of grief, and I think that’s okay. I think that’s why we make TV, you know? We take you on this trip. And this is part of it.

https://www.inverse.com/article/39984-star-trek-discovery-dr-culber-death-wilson-cruz-love

That was a twist (of his neck) that Dr. Culber didn’t see coming ;)
Too soon! :p
 
No. When they brag about the diversity, they're asking for it. They bragged having the first female captain & first officer duo, then they kill the captain (and demote the first officer.) Then they brag having an openly gay couple, only to kill one of them.

In some other show it would be unfortunate, but not a big deal. But it is a big deal here, at least to me.
The thing is we briefly got to see a mentor even parental role with Georgiou to Burnham. We didn't get to invest in it too much BUT it was there. It was a positive. Then it was totally ripped apart. Culber and Stamets have/had given an example of a loving couple, again another positive. It's hard to find that in this universe so it's particularly cynical to present the positives for the reason of wanting it to trigger a greater emotion when it's taken away.

THAT being said this whole parallel universe is a cheat to reverse things after already messing with us. Culber and Georgiou could still potentially resurface.
 
Just want to add that Culber's choice to confront Tyler rather than go to Lorca makes complete sense for the character. Stamets' life is in danger because Lorca overruled Culber's professional opinion. Culber also makes clear that he sees himself as unwillingly complicit in actions he views as unethical. He's also just had a patient taken away from him. He absolutely doesn't trust Lorca. Given that Culber seems to believe the best and warmest of people until given reason not to (he puts up with the crotchety Stamets, after all), I imagine he might naively go to Tyler before Lorca, even given the possibility of a security risk.

There's also the way Frakes keys in on Stamets in both Culber-Tyler scenes, reminding us that Culber's mind is very much on the man he can't care for right now. What does he say to Lorca? "Maybe you wanted this to happen?" Culber's going to view himself as defender of the vulnerable right now, while being probably somewhat emotionally compromised.
 
It's funny how killing half the LGBT characters on TV isn't political, but pointing out that it's happening is.

You can make anything political if you try. Sometimes a show is just a show.

I'd rather just enjoy the show. That, and we know that
Culber's story doesn't end here...so relax dawg. There's other things to rally about.
 
Last edited:
And sometimes a show is indicative of a wider cultural trend where one group of characters is the main target whenever a 'dramatic' death is needed.
 
And sometimes a show is indicative of a wider cultural trend where one group of characters is the main target whenever a 'dramatic' death is needed.

The fucking primary show runner on DSC is an out gay man.

I'm sorry, but the likelihood that his intent is to allow a gay character to be the obvious "target" is extremely slim. I'd suggest you look for causes elsewhere.

Be patient. Story isn't over yet.
 
Isn't it? Only supportive gushing comments allowed :lol:

As opposed to predictable, mundane, endless negative comments from the same 2-3 people who are chagrined that the series doesn't have the same outdated sensibilities from the late 1980's?

Also, what I said wasn't "gushing" in any way. Culber's death was cliche because he was an extremely likable, sensitive, smart character that the audience immediately liked. It's done for drama. That's not gushing to admit it was a dramatic device (albeit an effective one).

But.....

1. The story isn't over yet, and since I'm not predisposed to dislike it, I'm gong to see what that payoff or conclusion is before I judge.
2. He wasn't killed off to shed the show of an over abundance of gay characters, which is what some are trying to push as a way to discredit DSC

Some of you people need to make up your fucking minds. Half the haters are crying because "SJWs shoving diversity down our throats" and the other half are bitching that the show isn't diverse enough and kills off diversity characters.

Never seen a more clear example of finding exactly what you're looking for to justify an opinion.
 
And sometimes a show is indicative of a wider cultural trend where one group of characters is the main target whenever a 'dramatic' death is needed.
I feel they went down this route with Georgiou. When 'Discovery' was being promoted having two ships and two Captains, one female, was promoted. We were like how unique there will be the name ship Discovery but also this Shenzhou with the female lead and a female captain. Okay, out of the two captains Georgiou and Lorca odds were that IF one was to go it would be Georgiou. Move on. So we have a female Head of Security - Landry. She's the next to go only to be replaced by Tyler. I was surprised with Stamets/Culber that if one were to die it was Culber, but I don't see why he had to die. His death required him to be VERY STUPID. Just like Landry. So all this might be balanced out with a 'replacement' Culber or Georgiou, a mirror universe one perhaps. But it still leaves a bad taste how dumb these guys deaths were. :(
 
Yeah the problem is that if they manage to resurrect Culber somehow, that could set a Marvel Universe "nobody is ever really dead" precedent that would be irritating. On the other hand, if they don't find a way to resurrect him, we're losing a great character and a meaningful LGBT relationship on television.

Strictly from a story perspective, I can accept Culber's death. But all of the implications around it are troublesome.
Scotty, Spock and NuKirk say hello.
 
I feel they went down this route with Georgiou. When 'Discovery' was being promoted having two ships and two Captains, one female, was promoted. We were like how unique there will be the name ship Discovery but also this Shenzhou with the female lead and a female captain. Okay, out of the two captains Georgiou and Lorca odds were that IF one was to go it would be Georgiou. Move on. So we have a female Head of Security - Landry. She's the next to go only to be replaced by Tyler. I was surprised with Stamets/Culber that if one were to die it was Culber, but I don't see why he had to die. His death required him to be VERY STUPID. Just like Landry. So all this might be balanced out with a 'replacement' Culber or Georgiou, a mirror universe one perhaps. But it still leaves a bad taste how dumb these guys deaths were. :(

^^

I hate to break it to you, but many, many untimely deaths are due to "stupidity." That's common life (and Darwinism).

It's also easy to call someone "stupid" when you have the near-omnipotent point of view of the viewer.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top