The only thing we saw nuSpock come to terms with, was the fact that he was a 'Momma's Boy'.![]()
Yeah, being upset at the murder of your mother makes you a "momma's boy"

The only thing we saw nuSpock come to terms with, was the fact that he was a 'Momma's Boy'.![]()
The only thing we saw nuSpock come to terms with, was the fact that he was a 'Momma's Boy'.![]()
Yeah, being upset at the murder of your mother makes you a "momma's boy"![]()
I'd say that Spock coming to terms with his half-human nature was more than a superficial plot point.
Like hell it wasn't superficial. That's, in fact, a great example of what I'm talking about. That's just the justification for the stupid scene where Spock shot Kirk out an airlock, which was a poor attempt to force Nimoy into the plot.
Yes, of course him. Pretty egotistical of you that you keep repeating yourself to us that don't like the film.Poor according to? You?
They didn't need any either.
It wasn't about making Spock "more accessable", it was about telling Spock's story in 2 hours, rather than between 1964 and 1979.
And then there is this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bI3SGSxpHTk#t=3m37s
It wasn't about making Spock "more accessable", it was about telling Spock's story in 2 hours, rather than between 1964 and 1979.
Exactly! It was that journey that made the character who he was. So many well told stories came about because of his "inner battle".It wasn't about making Spock "more accessable", it was about telling Spock's story in 2 hours, rather than between 1964 and 1979.
But telling Spock's story in two hours is in no way satisfying. You just miss so much of the journey.
Yes, of course him. Pretty egotistical of you that you keep repeating yourself to us that don't like the film.
Good for them!And yes they relied HEAVILY on the sets and action to carry the movie to what they wanted.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.