I don't find the prospect of fame at all appealing. Maybe a level of recognition in artistic and literary circles would be nice -- or academic circles, someday, should I choose to pursue more higher learning.
See, as a writer, I think fame limits what a creator can do. The money is just too damn tempting, and you get skittish about doing anything that's going to end up cutting off the money and you end "compromising" (aka: selling out) the art. Plus you end up being a "Brand", and then the question becomes: Are they buying my work because they like it, or because they like "me" [the brand]; Gene Roddenberry, George Lucas, Anne Rice, Stephen King, are all examples of this
(not saying I'm remotely in their class, not by a 1/4; I'm just using them as examples. The difference between me and them is the difference between a ant [me] and a steel toed boot [them]).
As I say, I'd rather be some middle-aged (still got a few years to go on that one) unknown, reading short-stories at open-mic at some coffee house than a "Stephen King" whose more or less a brand name and could write "Boo!" on a napkin and sell 3 million copies.
See, as a writer, I think fame limits what a creator can do. The money is just too damn tempting, and you get skittish about doing anything that's going to end up cutting off the money and you end "compromising" (aka: selling out) the art. Plus you end up being a "Brand", and then the question becomes: Are they buying my work because they like it, or because they like "me" [the brand]; Gene Roddenberry, George Lucas, Anne Rice, Stephen King, are all examples of this
(not saying I'm remotely in their class, not by a 1/4; I'm just using them as examples. The difference between me and them is the difference between a ant [me] and a steel toed boot [them]).
As I say, I'd rather be some middle-aged (still got a few years to go on that one) unknown, reading short-stories at open-mic at some coffee house than a "Stephen King" whose more or less a brand name and could write "Boo!" on a napkin and sell 3 million copies.
I have to disagree with you on King. He still writes whatever interests him at the moment as far as I can tell. However, I'm curious when you mention yourself being a writer havey ou actually published? If so I'd be interested in taking a look at it.
Local paper, only; columnist, reporter. Been "out of the game" for a few years. Working on restarting my fiction career-- which was getting some interest before I dropped it-- that I put on hold.
I really do think King is pigeon-holed, but he's also one of those that ends up defing the pigeon-hole. He pretty much created the modern "horror novel". Much in the way that Rice is credited with the angsty-vamp genre.
Local paper, only; columnist, reporter. Been "out of the game" for a few years. Working on restarting my fiction career-- which was getting some interest before I dropped it-- that I put on hold.
Best of luck!
I think King is pingeon holed by people who haven't read him. He's written a number of non-horror books but many still write him off as a trashy horror writer.I really do think King is pigeon-holed, but he's also one of those that ends up defing the pigeon-hole. He pretty much created the modern "horror novel". Much in the way that Rice is credited with the angsty-vamp genre.
-- Ive read some of his non-horror stuff (he has some interesting writings on the business and craft of writing) but it isn't the same quality as his horror stuff. I'm not a King fan, but I can't call the man bad at what he does. But the truth is that the die-hard King fans are like die-hard 'Trek fans: slap the brand name on the box and cash the check.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.