In fighting between Apollo and other Greek gods?
You mean the fighting stopped once they got back to their own planet?
In fighting between Apollo and other Greek gods?
::shrugs::You mean the fighting stopped once they got back to their own planet?
You mean in real life?
No, not at all. The galaxy is so vast that even if there are other civilizations the chance that two or more of them are close enough to each other for communication, let alone conquest is very slim.
Plus the ready availability of any resource a civilization might want via the astronomical number of uninhabited planets and asteroids in the vastness of space (where they'd be easier to mine, too) makes conquering other species due to competition for resources pointless.
And aliens having no immune system to cope with the microbes and parasites of other I habitation might also make competition for living space (and colonisation) impractical or downright pointless.
And again such a competition would only be likely to happen if several spacefaring civilization spawned basically on top of each other(by galactic standards)
There’s another option. Maybe faster than light travel is impossible so any travel to other star systems inherently means traveling at relativistic speeds. So you COULD get to other Star systems, but by the time you got there your planet would have gone through thousands of years and then you’d be on your own with no way back.
If that’s the case, the only reason it’d ever be worth it to go was as a last ditch effort to save the species.
The problem is that if we are in danger of extinction we'll no longer have the resources to send a handful of people to another star system. Only a prosperous people can spare the enormous amounts of energy and matter necessary for that, however, a prosperous people has no reason to do so. That's a sort of paradox.
Well, if travel to another star system was possible then we have to assume that either we are the only ones or that we are the very first ones to get to that point (otherwise we would have already been contacted, nay conquered)
I think you're missing the point. No matter how vast the universe a space-faring civilization will eventually fill it. And it won't take very long because, as I said before, expansion is exponential. If it takes you, say, ten thousand years to double the size of your empire then in ten times as much it will be multiplied by a thousand, twenty times a million, thirty a billion, forty a trillion, fifty a quadrillion... No matter how big the universe you can see that it won't take long for it to be filled.I think you're vastly underestimating the size of the universe...
I think you're missing the point. No matter how vast the universe a space-faring civilization will eventually fill it. And it won't take very long because, as I said before, expansion is exponential. If it takes you, say, ten thousand years to double the size of your empire then in ten times as much it will be multiplied by a thousand, twenty times a million, thirty a billion, forty a trillion, fifty a quadrillion... No matter how big the universe you can see that it won't take long for it to be filled.
You've heard that the universe is expanding, that in addition it may not last forever, and that, even if does last forever, its heat death is hypothesized, right?No matter how big the universe you can see that it won't take long for it to be filled.
You've heard that the universe is expanding, that in addition it may not last forever, and that, even if does last forever, its heat death is hypothesized, right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble's_law
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe
There are many kinds of resources that could easily run out before your filling up of space that supposedly won't take long could have time to transpire.
The short version is that the situation is way more complicated than you're making it out to be.
Well, imaginary things that haven't been proven possible are hard to understand, actually. But this is silly, and off-topic, and I'm done with it.No, what you don't understand is that what I am saying is that if FTL is possible and if one space-faring civilization had begun only a million years ago, it would have already filled the universe. Just as one single virus can infect an entire population in no time. IOW, expansion is exponential. I don't believe it's that hard a concept to understand. And one million years at the scale of the universe is nothing.
No need to introduce FTL there. If travel from star to star is possible in the first place (and there's no known reason why it wouldn't be), the Milky Way could be covered in a jiffy. Actual travel at, say, one percent of lightspeed would probably still take an eyeblink compared to how long it might take to set up a starship factory at the destination.
It's the inevitablilty of an avalanche against complications like shrubs and sheep on the slope. And thus the question of why the Milky Way hasn't already been overrun a dozen times over requires some pretty fundamental assumptions to be satisfactorily answered. No, it doesn't suffice that a civilization might die after mere thousands of years - a billion other incarnations of that civilization elsewhere in the wave of expansion would survive. It doesn't matter much if the expansion loses coherence, either: the billions will average out to give a galactic monobloc culture nevertheless, at the resolution we need to be concerned with.
To stop the avalanche, we have to postulate that the downslope somehow becomes an upslope, or that there is a deep chasm to swallow it all in mid-run. We just don't know of any good candidates for such out there in the physical world, and might have to turn inwards to surmise that any sapience with enough drive to expand will always consume itself in war, long before reaching galactic dominance. The Goldilocks minds that want to sail past the horizon but aren't sufficiently interested in it to try and sink the competition might not exist as a thing.
Timo Saloniemi
Also, despite the often-advocated conception of the Federation as a post-scarcity economy, it really isn't, especially in ways that the magic tech depends upon. Dilithium is something that has to be mined, regeneration of it is problematic, and conflicts are fought over it. Colonies can fail or get into jeopardy because of environmental conditions (e.g., radiation, again), disease, or loss of food supply. Even unopposed by other civilizations, there are frequently difficult or even intractable problems resulting in various kinds of scarce resources, that put the brakes on expansion.If FTL were possible, that doesn’t mean it‘s safe and practical for living organic beings. Or they have any practical way to determine for sure that exoplanet they see in the distance supports their life. Or if it does they won’t immediately die from the microorganisms there. You have to solve radiation protection, you have to be able to navigate any asteroid dense regions, and you have to hope you don’t slam into a grain of dust at over a c.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.