Actually, I'm not transposing anything. If you read the discussion, you would understand that people are saying a cerebral trek flick could never, and would never be successful in this era. And that the contemporary audience doesn't have the ability to appreciate a cerebral trek flick in the 2010's. Basically that the trek films are as they are, because they could not be anything else. And then you would also understand that my argument is if it's done well, you can absolutely make a cerebral, slower paced film, and it be successful. This discussion has absolutely nothing to do with star trek tng or nutrek. It's about the conceptual ideas of what a film is allowed to be in this era vs. era's past, and how mediums affect the finished product.