Discovery Turbolift Caverns - Explained with Science/Math - (Disco S3)

Discussion in 'Trek Tech' started by KamenRiderBlade, Jan 25, 2021.

  1. tesral

    tesral Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2021
    Location:
    My Desk
    To quote: "They don't know us very well."
     
  2. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    Probably not.
     
  3. tesral

    tesral Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2021
    Location:
    My Desk
    Bob Probert on Starship Modeler forum about Robert Wise's comment: "No one comes to these things with a slide rule."

    No, we use graphing calculators and digital verniers!
     
    publiusr, DEWLine and Ronald Held like this.
  4. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    And I'm just reminded of my encounter with a Trek writer at a convention. He simply didn't have the time that we do to dedicate to such things.
     
    Go-Captain and tesral like this.
  5. tesral

    tesral Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2021
    Location:
    My Desk
    There is truth to that.
     
  6. publiusr

    publiusr Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Location:
    publiusr
    I’ve always thought of Enterprise as a city in space. TAS’ shuttlebay confirmed that to me.

    It never sat well to have trek ships now on the smaller end of things.
     
  7. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    It didn't with me either. Honestly, when I was younger and doing the whole (stupid) discussion with friends about Star Wars vs. Star Trek and the thing I took away from them was their ships. Star Trek always showed bigger being better. The ENT-D was bigger than the TOS ENT, etc. Star Trek presented ships as these beautiful complex things that got better as they go bigger. DS9 was the rare exception to that rule but that was my impression.

    Ships getting bigger always seemed to be Star Trek's way of highlighting technical growth.
     
    publiusr likes this.
  8. DEWLine

    DEWLine Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2003
    Location:
    Ottawa, Canada
    I like seeing the fuller range of possible designs, small, great and in between...
     
  9. Go-Captain

    Go-Captain Captain Captain

    Joined:
    May 23, 2015
    Watching TNG on its own gave me that impression with one caveat. The E-D is weak for its size, so a Vorcha matches it. I don't know if that's based on anything, because it's such an old idea of mine, but my thinking has been the E-D lugs around a city, while the Vorcha is a pure warship. That means the Vorcha has superior power density, making it a better combatant.

    Episode 1 of TNG supports that with the idea that the E-D is much better in a fight without the saucer, and once the saucer is gone the battle section is pretty much Vorcha size.
     
  10. David cgc

    David cgc Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2002
    Location:
    Florida
    In "Heart of Glory," Worf has a line to the Klingon criminals that the Enterprise-D is "an exceptional weapon" when "relieved of its bulk." On the other hand, in BoBW, Riker nixes the idea of separating when encountering the Borg cube because the saucer's impulse engines gives the ship more power, so it's also not that the saucer is entirely dead-weight for the engineering section and makes the ship perform worse when joined.
     
  11. Go-Captain

    Go-Captain Captain Captain

    Joined:
    May 23, 2015
    More power and bigger phaser arrays with the saucer, but less maneuverability, and possibly weaker (larger) shields with the saucer. Then again, throughout the Dominion War the Galaxy class carried its saucer into battle too.