• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Detroit wants to save itself by shrinking

John Picard

John Picard

Vice Admiral
Admiral
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100308/ap_on_bi_ge/us_downsizing_detroit

Wow. Just -- WOW. I've driven around/through that festering shithole of a city and have always wondered if something like this would ever happen. I often wondered if an American city ever tear down abandoned neighborhoods and shrink itself. Overall, I think this is fantastic. Get rid of the blight and become concerned for the citizens. This goes with my thread in the Science/Technology forum concerning high speed rail. It's high time the US realize that dependency on the automobile, along with the urban sprawl it creates, leads to something like what's happening in, of all places, Detroit Michigan.

Thoughts?
 
About time. There's no way that Detroit will ever be able to maintain the property inside it's city limits now. Might as well shrink things down to a manageable area.
 
Why won't Omni Consumer Products buy the festering crap and turn it into Delta City, patrolled by Robocop...
 
I believe Detroit is actually following in the footsteps of one of their Rust Belt cousins: Flint, Michigan began this process about a year ago, if I'm recalling correctly.

Now, if we can only convince somewhere like Phoenix to start shrinking...
 
Its sounds good as long as the people who live in a area that is going to be pulled down get another house or get enough money to buy another house and don't just end up on the streets.
 
This plan sounds expensive. How can the city possibly afford this?

Hundreds of millions of federal dollars will be needed to buy land, raze buildings and relocate residents, since this financially desperate city does not have the means to do it on its own.
Click to expand...
Oh, now I get it. More spending of money we don't have. Screw Detroit.
 
^ The alternative is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to maintain infrastructure that isn't being used. If that land is no longer urban, there's 40 sq. miles which no longer need water pipes, an extensive power grid, road maintenance, schools, police coverage, etc. Long term, it's probably a money-saving proposal.
 
Canadave said:
^ The alternative is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to maintain infrastructure that isn't being used. If that land is no longer urban, there's 40 sq. miles which no longer need water pipes, an extensive power grid, road maintenance, schools, police coverage, etc. Long term, it's probably a money-saving proposal.
Click to expand...

Not to mention squatters, urban blight/pollution, roving gangs, etc. Nope, it's time to remove the sprawl and intelligently plan a city.
 
Canadave said:
^ The alternative is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to maintain infrastructure that isn't being used. If that land is no longer urban, there's 40 sq. miles which no longer need water pipes, an extensive power grid, road maintenance, schools, police coverage, etc. Long term, it's probably a money-saving proposal.
Click to expand...
Why not rent the land to movie companies? It'd be perfect for post-apocalyptic action flicks, Escape from New York-type movies, anything requiring vast swaths of urban ruin. They could just abandon the land and let the buildings decay -- the dirtier and more dilapidated, the better!
 
scotpens said:
Canadave said:
^ The alternative is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to maintain infrastructure that isn't being used. If that land is no longer urban, there's 40 sq. miles which no longer need water pipes, an extensive power grid, road maintenance, schools, police coverage, etc. Long term, it's probably a money-saving proposal.
Click to expand...
Why not rent the land to movie companies? It'd be perfect for post-apocalyptic action flicks, Escape from New York-type movies, anything requiring vast swaths of urban ruin. They could just abandon the land and let the buildings decay -- the dirtier and more dilapidated, the better!
Click to expand...

Leave The Detroit! Everyone leave The Detroit!
 
scotpens said:
Canadave said:
^ The alternative is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to maintain infrastructure that isn't being used. If that land is no longer urban, there's 40 sq. miles which no longer need water pipes, an extensive power grid, road maintenance, schools, police coverage, etc. Long term, it's probably a money-saving proposal.
Click to expand...
Why not rent the land to movie companies? It'd be perfect for post-apocalyptic action flicks, Escape from New York-type movies, anything requiring vast swaths of urban ruin. They could just abandon the land and let the buildings decay -- the dirtier and more dilapidated, the better!
Click to expand...

Do you really think there are that many movie companies that need abandoned urban areas to shoot in? Again, we're talking 40 square miles, here. That's a massive amount of land. I'm sure that one square mile preserved would be enough for these purposes.
 
Maybe they could turn it into a gated community for people who like the Post Apocalyptic genre. :cool:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top