• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Describe YOUR new Star Trek series.

Pure fantasy (sorry about that), but imagine you're contacted by the powers that be and they want YOU to create the new Star Trek TV series for them.

What would you like to see in your new series?
If I wanted to have fun and/or do something new and interesting?

Do a series about the Enterprise (cash in on the pre-existing JJverse sets and props) on its five year mission. Have them encounter Miri's planet in the first episode, which leads them to realize that somebody out there 1) has the technology to create duplicates of entire planets and 2) has also been duplicating/transplanting intelligent species for some reason. Kirk decides the focus of their five-year mission will be to find whoever those people are, whom we come to know as "The Preservers."


Of course, if I wanted to gaurantee success, I'd make a series about Kirk and company's adventures in Starfleet Academy and plan for a three-season run.
 
For me, I've been thinking recently that a true spin-off of TOS would be interesting. Set a century after TOS, it would offer a view into the world brought forth by all the discoveries made by the Enterprise and other starships of the 23rd century.

This show would be completely separate from the films and TNG and its spinoffs. Only beholden from a continuity standpoint to the original 79 episodes.
A truly fascinating idea. If I were rebooting a future Trek (beyond TOS) or even rebooting TNG this is the route I like.
 
Last edited:
For me, I've been thinking recently that a true spin-off of TOS would be interesting. Set a century after TOS, it would offer a view into the world brought forth by all the discoveries made by the Enterprise and other starships of the 23rd century.

This show would be completely separate from the films and TNG and its spinoffs. Only beholden from a continuity standpoint to the original 79 episodes.
A truly fascinating idea. If I were rebboting a future Trek (beyond TOS) or even rebooting TNG this is the route I like.

Probably too insular as an idea for general audiences. Might make a fascinating book project though. Since those are pointed at the hard core fans of Trek.
 
For me, I've been thinking recently that a true spin-off of TOS would be interesting. Set a century after TOS, it would offer a view into the world brought forth by all the discoveries made by the Enterprise and other starships of the 23rd century.

This show would be completely separate from the films and TNG and its spinoffs. Only beholden from a continuity standpoint to the original 79 episodes.
A truly fascinating idea. If I were rebboting a future Trek (beyond TOS) or even rebooting TNG this is the route I like.

Probably too insular as an idea for general audiences. Might make a fascinating book project though. Since those are pointed at the hard core fans of Trek.
Back in the late '90s and early 2000s a couple of friends and I co-authored a collection of TOS fanfic stories in a zine we called Trek 80 Plus. We used the novel Spock Must Die! as the 80th TOS episode never filmed and from there we did basically what STC is doing--writing TOS stories as if none of the films or subsequent stories ever happened.
 
A truly fascinating idea. If I were rebboting a future Trek (beyond TOS) or even rebooting TNG this is the route I like.

Probably too insular as an idea for general audiences. Might make a fascinating book project though. Since those are pointed at the hard core fans of Trek.
Back in the late '90s and early 2000s a couple of friends and I co-authored a collection of TOS fanfic stories in a zine we called Trek 80 Plus. We used the novel Spock Must Die! as the 80th TOS episode never filmed and from there we did basically what STC is doing--writing TOS stories as if none of the films or subsequent stories ever happened.

I think wherever CBS goes next for TV, they need to pretty much strip Trek down to its core elements and go from there.
 
On this forum I opted for an idea that rebooted TOS yet in more up-to-date sensibilities. Yes, there would be familiar names and references, but so much of it would be reinterpreted and visually it would look somewhat familiar, but otherwise be divorced from what came before. It wouldn't be of the Prime contuinuity or of the JJ continuity. It would be started with a clean page.

In very loose terms it would be somewhat akin to nuBSG, but without losing Star Trek's distinct sense of optimism. In overall tone it would be much more akin to TOS (particularly first season) than anything that came later.

Perhaps there would have to be compromises, but I would strive for fewer humanoid aliens (when possible) and more nonhumanoid types. I would try to reinvent the Klingons and maybe some of the other races. I would sketch out a somewhat loose backstory set in the series past and keep only some similar elements of the Prime universe's historical backstory.

And I'd push it forward to at least the 26th century and stay away from references to 20th and 21st century Earth.

In some respects you honour what came before in terms of approach to story and a few other things. You also honour what came before by not trying to mess it up any further--leave it as it is and start something new.

I would use the idea of transitional change for characters--you start the series with one group of characters and five to ten years later you end with a different group of characters. You can treat time a bit differently and try to be a bit more credible. So instead of one season equaling one year in your fictional universe it might equal two years or so. A five-year mission could be told in three seasons of 13 episodes a season (so the major events of the mission could average out about one roughly every month and a half).

The only real constant for the entire series would be the Enterprise wherein we could see perhaps three to four or so different CO's during the course of the series.
 
The only real constant for the entire series would be the Enterprise wherein we could see perhaps three to four or so different CO's during the course of the series.

I don't know if I could see a reimagined TOS without Kirk in the captain's chair?
 
The only real constant for the entire series would be the Enterprise wherein we could see perhaps three to four or so different CO's during the course of the series.

I don't know if I could see a reimagined TOS without Kirk in the captain's chair?
The show would begin with Kirk taking command from Pike. The show goes for three seasons with Kirk in command after which he is promoted and moves on (wherein he can remain in the background). There are different ways it could ne done, but initially I envisioned Kirk's first officer, Uhura, being promoted and given command. I envisioned her in command for two or so seasons and then she, too, moves on and perhaps Picard comes aboard to take command wherein he's the CO until the series end. By this time Kirk is an admiral.

I don't quite recall all the details (I have it written down somewhere), but thats a broad sketch of it.

So the "next generation" is literally the next one in line only aboard the same ship (imagine if we had had a season of Jeffery Hunter's Pike before they replaced some of the cast and then continued with William Shatner as Kirk and the rest. The only real constants would have been the Enterprise and Spock).


In this reimagining Uhura is Pike's Number One when Kirk assumes command. She gets a rank promotion to full commander and remains as XO until Kirk moves on after the five-year mission wherein Uhura is made Captain in rank and position. Spock has become Science Officer not long before Kirk assumes command. He remains Science Officer until at least the end of Kirk's five-year mission and maybe a bit beyond. Eventually Data could be brought in as the Science Officer replacing Spock.

This is just one possibility.
 
Last edited:
The idea is to cut the umbilical cord in terms of continuity from any previous one. My idea would be to have many familiar things in place, but thoroughly updated for today. That means trying to recapture an element that TOS exuded: take some familiar ideas as well as speculative ones outside of science fiction and repackage them in a new way that seems unlike anything so before.

There would still be an Enterprise, a 5-year mission significantly involving deepspace exploration, a Starfleet and Federation, some familiar aliens and perhaps a few other things, but it would all be updated and some shifted around a bit.

For the Enterprise I'd want to evoke the original Matt Jefferies' design even while making it more futuristic and pushing it forward to a 26th or 29th century setting. Suffice to say some of the prehistory could be familiar even as it's fleshed out or shifted.


A reboot can take two basic approaches.

When TNG premiered we had something of an arms length reboot, at least in the beginning. Essentially the idea was to supposedly be set within the same continuity as what came before, but avoiding a lot of overt references to what came before. Any references to the past were usually tangental and vague. Note in TNG's "The Naked Now" the crew of the E-D discover that the TOS Enterprise crew dealt with a similar situation. But they refer to the previous event and who is associated with it as if it could have been just anybody. There's no, "OMG, the great Kirk dealt with this, too?" kind of thing. It was just another ship in another time. Of course, this would change as the series progressed (in fits-and-starts) and throughout the other spin-off series. It happens again in DS9 during their first Mirror Universe encounter where Bashir has heard of Kirk but Kira hasn't.

This actually would be one way to approach a future series reboot set in a post TNG period or even one concurrent with TOS, TMP or TNG (and DS9 and VOY are essentially TNG era). If you're not doing the familiar characters then set your stories off somewhere else and keep the references few and vague.

The other option is to cut the umbilical cord. Keep some core familiar elements and fashion everything else from a clean sheet. This would work whether you want to reboot the original characters and setting or if you want to do something completely unrelated. From this point one could have the Enterprise, Kirk and company, and everything else could be completely different and the period set in the 23rd, 26th or 30th century. You could do it as if you were building Star Trek from scratch. And you wouldn't be burdened by anachronisms of the past.

I love TOS and the current Star Trek Continues project, but even in enjoying those you have to shrug off some things that you simply wouldn't do today. This is one area where JJ missed the an opportunity because he wanted to keep a lot that was familiar and just move it around a bit.

I can easily envision rebooting TOS where you could recognize familiar elemnts and yet so much else would be different. The Enterprise could still be essentially a saucer with a support hull and nacelles, but the tech and hardware would be far in advance of anything seen in any Trek series or film or most anything else in SF in the visual medium. Communicators wouldn't be handheld or badges, but implants. Datapads would be even more multipupose than what current smartphones and tablets can do. A datapad could actually be merged with the tricorder. While I wouldn't copy the TMP uniforms to me they do indicate a general idea of looking more futuristic.

There are nuggets of ideas within all of Trek that were never really explored properly. Of course, there's also a lot outside of Trek that could be mined and adapted into a new Trek. TOS took a lot of already existing ideas and repackaged them into a new form that was daring and exciting for its time. Since TOS it has largely been mildly redressing those ideas. A new Star Trek could really push it forward. Depending how it's done I could see myself having my original Star Trek to cherish while still interested and excited about a new take on it. The beauty of this is it could draw existing fans as well as new ones and all the while not seem threatening to existing fans.

This is actually part of the issue some fans have with the current reboot. Instead of doing a complete clean restart they sought to tie it to what came before. Some fans are okay with that while others can feel it's disrespectful to the original materiel. In Abrams' version the original continuity has been wiped away and its not hard to see how that could piss off some people. But with a completely new restart that doesn't happen. It's like doing Star Trek set in a parallel universe not at all connected to the original even though some of it is familiar.

Think about this if you're willing to really let your imagination wander. Imagine, for a moment, what could have been done with ENT if it had been a complete reboot. You have a Kirk and Spock (and the rest) instead of Archer and T'Pol (and the rest) and the Enterprise (looking somewhat more advanced than what we can do today) being one of the very first to really head out there. It's the mid 22nd century and other than Vulcans no one familar at all has been encountered yet. You can completely rewrite everything. Or maybe the Enterprise is a fast reletavistic ship with a voyage that will last hundreds of years even as it will only be a few years to the crew (and the human lifespan can be 150 years). And again you can completely rewrite everything going forward. There really are a lot of possibilities.

A lot of fans can yearn for part of what came before to be revived, but in all honesty I don't think you can really do that anymore, at least not for anything beyond a web based fan production. If you want this to work for a primetime audience you have to push it forward. If you don't then you risk a lot of potential viewers possibly shrugging it off as same-old-same-old...again.


The setting is the 29th century. The Federation is recovering from a protracted war with the Romulan Empire ending forty years ago, a war that dragged for twenty-five years. The Federation had been a burgeoning alliance prior to the conflict encompassing many worlds and are now seeking to regroup its alliance. The war ended in a draw and both sides are intent on solidifying their status with current, former and new allies.

The Klingons - once leaders of a great empire who are rumoured to reside somewhere in the Sagittarius Arm.
The Andorians - allies of the Federation
The Gorn - allies of the Romulans


If I were tasked with rebooting Star Trek I think I'd play with the characters a bit.

Captain James Kirk - transferring from command of a smaller and more combat oriented vessel. He's replacing former ship's Captain, Christopher Pike, who commanded the Enterprise for its first six years.
Commander Nyota Uhura - she is the ship's Executive Officer and dubious of Pike's replacement. She is an experienced Contact Officer in dealing with alien races.
Lieutenant ILyik Spock - a young Vulcan/Romulan hybrid and ship's Science Officer.
Lieutenant Commander Lenora McCoy - recently assigned as ship's Chief Medical Officer.
Lieutenant Commander Montgomery Scott - a veteran spacer of many years and deeply involved in designing and building the Enterprise. He has been ship's Chief Engineer since launch and worked closely with Commodore Robert April who directed the new starship program.
Lieutenant S'ulu - a Medusan who must always wear a contact suit. He is the ship's exceptional HelmNav.
Lieutenant Olesya Chekov - ship's Chief of Security.

The Enterprise is among the vanguards, dispatched into the Sagittarius Arm to re-establish contact with former allies and resume exploration of unknown regions.


I like the idea of a 10-13 episode season with the episodes being the high points spread out over about a year in universe. If you can keep the series running five years then it's perfect. Each season could be a mini arc even as the show is essentially episodic.

But you could deal with different ideas.
- Will the Klingons be found? Who will find them first? What will they be like? Who will they side with, if with anyone?
- Are the Gorn steadfast allies of the Romulans or is there dissent and uncertainty?
- Are the Andorians fully steadfast with the Federation?
- Does Spock have to deal with suspicion among some of his shipmates because of his mixed heritage?
- In the beginning there's tension between Kirk and Uhura. I'd take a page from the 1950's submarine film Run Silent, Run Deep to play out a similar tension between an aspiring commander (Burt Lancaster) and an established one (Clark Gable).

There could be other questions and background plot lines. In terms of tone there could be something of a Cold War atmosphere and something like a Babylon 5 type sensibility. That said, while the Federation is not a Utopia there is still a general sense of idealism to it.

In terms of history I would adapt some general ideas from what came before, but flesh them out.

- Humans used relativistic ships until the early 23rd century when Zefram Cochrane of the Alpha Centauri colony develops warp drive. At that point humanity has a sphere of influence of about 40 light year radius.
- Within the 23rd century humanity will encounter the Vulcans and Andorians and eventually (centuries later) they will found the United Federation of Planets.
- Over the next few centuries other races are encountered and the UFP grows along with occasional small conflicts along the way.
- Late in the 28th century Federation and allied ships start disappearing and a Starbase goes silent. Even as the Federation starts piecing things together the Romulans launch a large scale attack. The conflict will drag for twenty-five years before an uneasy cease-fire is agreed upon.

Of course this all general backstory.

There are some other characters it could be interesting to reimagine: Kor, Kang, MBenga, De Salle, Komack, Nogura, Thelin, Garth, Saavik, Stone, Tracy, Miranda Jones, Areel Shaw, Chapel, Rand, Riley, Angela Martine, Carolyn Palamas, Richard Daystrom, etc. You could also reinvent some things or characters from the TNG era.

I would hesitate to adapt or rewrite previous stories, but certain ideas might be adapted. The Prime Directive (if adapted) would have to be rethought.


The idea I was trying for isn't so much evolving from everything seen before throughout the franchise from one stage to the next, but to go back to the beginning and ask how to update that concept as if none of the others had happened.

TMP and TNG were evolutions of what came before, conceptually. JJtrek wasn't an evolution, but rather a rewind/reset button as filtered through his sensibilities.

Now one can go back to Roddenberry's essential ideas and do two things going forward: either create a new space adventure that has nothing to do with Star Trek while evoking some of the same ideas and sensibilities, or create a new Star Trek that builds from familiar things yet goes forward as if none of what we saw onscreen happened.

Of course, most everyone will have different interpretations in approach and they will emphasize different things. And if you are intent on doing Star Trek then you're faced with another two choices: either set it in the familiar continuity at some point and work to fit within it, or cut the umbilical and do it with a largely clean sheet that has elements of the familiar while allowing you more creative freedom. The first option is fraught with challenge as we've seen with every incarnation in the franchise. Some can accept it while others get upset. Abrams stepped into the same pool with his approach as he tried to say it was a complete reboot, but supposedly still tied to what came before. Some accept it and others are pissed off.

So my thought is why not update what got the whole thing started yet without being tied to everything that followed? Meaning a genuine restart.


This idea will never see the light of day beyond my own imagination. But to that end I'm free to envision it as I please. It's a thought exercise starting with an interpretation of the Matt Jefferies' design as filtered through a 21st century perception and acknowledging all the changes seen in real science and technology as well as science fiction.
 
As I understand it, Roddenberry didn't want to specify which century Trek was set in.

Thus, the "Star Date" for the Captain's Log.
 
As I understand it, Roddenberry didn't want to specify which century Trek was set in.

Thus, the "Star Date" for the Captain's Log.
Except that in first season they started making references that sort of did. And then in TMP they got more specific. You should also set up your backstory even if you refer to it only occasionally and it helps keep your references consistent. So you might as well establish your timeframe even if you never state it explicitly onscreen.
 
There might be general references to earlier periods, but set later than early 21st century.

For example, there might be an interplanetary period-before warp drive-with a Moon base and a Mars base.

After that, an early interstellar period-when early warp drive vessels went exploring, and established colonies.
 
I would leave the 21st century pretty much blank. TOS had the Eugenics wars in the early 1990s which was fine for a show you thought everyone would forget about. But Star Trek later went on to be a massive franchise and when we got to the 1990s and the early 21st century the histories no longer lined up. I don't have a problem with that, but some fans did particularly when later writers wrote time travel stories set in our time period and we clearly saw things didn't line up.

So better to keep it vague and push it far forward.

The rest of the future history would be in broad general strokes with only a handful of specifics. You add to it as needed as your series progresses. That leaves room for future creativity.
 
Agreed, leave the 21st century pretty much blank.

One thing-warp drive would be such a quantum jump, that the characters would believe themselves living in a distinct era, or distinct age.
 
Another new Star Trek Idea :rommie:

Star Trek Marquis

Well, this is not the Marquis in the DS9 series. It is another Marquis. A terrorist organization in the early 25th century Star Trek Era.

The background story begin at the end of Dominion war. Where several Federation members feel unsatisfied with how human lead them. The problem is, Star fleet care more about Earth than their home world. They guard Earth with everything they got, but forget about the other members' homeworld. Making some of the member's homeworld to be invaded by Dominion.

So a secret organization was formed; to make human to step aside from the inner ring of the Federation. Well, skip forward, they successful. First, they take control of presidency. When one of their member was elected as the president of the Federation of Planet, they move the Federation capital planet to the other member's homeworld.

Then, they cut the Starfleet influence, and form a new Star Fleet that loyal to them. With a great deal of budget cut, Star Fleet can't work as intended. So they shrunk, until human doesn't has enough influence in the Federation anymore.

Now, in the early of 25th century, Human is no longer the centre of the Federation. They are set aside. But they struggle and don't want to give up with their current condition. When the diplomacy can't help thing better, some of the former Star Fleet officers form a new Marquis. To oppose the new regime, and to bring back the old Federation that they love.
 
I was thinking about Warped9's comments in regards to Information Technology (IT).

IT is one area of technology that has really taken off in recent years. But it has been commented that Trek could be seen as falling behind, outdated in terms of IT, except for Artificial Intelligence (AI).

Such irony.....

The TOS communicator may have seemed cool in the '60s, but it doesn't seem so impressive today. The TNG com badges still seem a bit futuristic, but only just barely.

I like the idea regarding the datapad, turn it into a more sophisticated/capable version of today's latest and greatest.

I would suggest imitating the computer in Space: 1999. The computer would respond to inquiries with both text and voice. Again, this would seem only slightly futuristic, but more realistic than blinking lights.

Extensive use of heads up displays.

I don't know about Augmented Reality. However, a good/practical version still seems just out of reach. Practical uses have been proposed. Again, something that seems just barely futuristic.

Virtual Reality? NuBSG used a version ("Blood and Chrome"). However, it might seem kind of lame compared to the holodeck.
 
Last edited:
The thing about the TOS communicators is that they were not cellphones which require an infrastructure to function. The communicators were independent transmitter/receivers with a range of thousands of miles. GR's early concept had them also able to serve as universal translators. Considering how often the crew were able to go planetside and easily converse with aliens it could be rationalized the communicators still had that function only it was never discussion. Same with the TNG comm badges.

One option could be to merge the communicator with the tricoder so you could have something roughly the size of a Samsung Galaxy Note. But such a device could still get lost or taken away. An implant style communicator--something done on the 1972 spy series SEARCH--would enable the ship or fellow personnel to keep a lock on you unless there were some kind of interference blocking the signal.
 
And what about biotechnology?

The level in Trek must be impressive, because of the Eugenics Wars. Really, using biotechnology to augment humans sounds very sophisticated, and futuristic.

Of course, it was outlawed because of the Eugenics Wars, but nevertheless it is implied that the life sciences are very advanced.
 
This morning I put on the DVD for "Into Darkness". Something I had forgotten-just before the space walk sequence, the attitude of the Enterprise was altered using (what appeared to be) rocket type thrusters. In this the movie resembled NuBSG.

BTW, two aspects of the space walk seemed plausible-use of rocket type thrusters to close the gap, and heads up displays in the space helmets.
 
And what about biotechnology?

The level in Trek must be impressive, because of the Eugenics Wars. Really, using biotechnology to augment humans sounds very sophisticated, and futuristic.

Of course, it was outlawed because of the Eugenics Wars, but nevertheless it is implied that the life sciences are very advanced.
Biotech is something not really addressed in TOS. You have to remember that eugenics refers mostly to selective breeding. Fifty years ago the idea of genetic engineering (as we understand it) would have been something very few people would have been talking about or even understand. To the general audience the idea of eugenics could be linked to the idea of the Nazis and their notions of a racially pure super race. This could also play on the lingering postwar fears of Nazis who had escaped justice and were still hiding and plotting out in the world somewhere.

Today the idea of the Eugenics Wars might not apply anymore and so in a rebooted Star Trek you could conceivably forget about it completely. If you want to make vague references to a third world war sometime during the 21st century then you could extrapolate from today's fears and concerns. Still, there is the idea of genetic engineering, but the fears among the population don't really seem to be there.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top