This.I'm for it when it served its original purpose, which at least here was to stop huge estates passing family member to family member without the taxman ever seeing it again, allowing the aristocracy to live essentially tax-free. But the rapidly rising house prices over the last decade or so have meant that many regular folks' estates now come close to what was originally a phenomenal cut-off point of £300k. As a result, I think the threshold needs re-examining, or the tax should be dropped.
That's largely the case already. The top 50% pay 97.11% of all income taxes. The top 1% of earners pay 40.42%. Before long we will have a voting majority with no income tax burden. [link]
That's largely the case already. The top 50% pay 97.11% of all income taxes. The top 1% of earners pay 40.42%. Before long we will have a voting majority with no income tax burden. [link]
That's largely the case already. The top 50% pay 97.11% of all income taxes. The top 1% of earners pay 40.42%. Before long we will have a voting majority with no income tax burden. [link]
Pointing that out certainly doesn't help your cause.
For those who for whatever odd reason don't understand what estate/death tax is, maybe I should explain. It is the condition wherein the assets of a person, after death, are taxed before being passed on in accordance with that person's will.
In other words, when Grandpa dies and leaves you his house, Uncle Sam skims X% off the top before giving you the keys.
I'm with cultcross. Particularly large estates--at least those worth several million--should be taxed to prevent perpetual financial dynasties. Taxing somebody who inherited a $300,000 house, though, seems a bit silly. It should be adjusted with its original purpose in mind, not levied indiscriminately.
I'm with cultcross. Particularly large estates--at least those worth several million--should be taxed to prevent perpetual financial dynasties. Taxing somebody who inherited a $300,000 house, though, seems a bit silly. It should be adjusted with its original purpose in mind, not levied indiscriminately.
In the U.S., the first several million (forgot the exact amount- I want to say $2.5m) are exempt from estate taxes. The same goes for states that have an estate tax. So unless the estate is large, the tax won't kick in.
While the majority of estates aren't affected, I would like to see the minimum level raised so that family farms and other small businesses don't get nailed. Of course, a little financial planning can keep most out of the situation in the first place.
Yes. I don't know why we have all these taxes when the money isn't being used right to begin with? There should only be 2 taxes in America 1. A flat National Tax of 15% and A State Tax of 5%...those numbers can be adjusted as long as they are low and stay flat...IMHO. TY.
S.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.