• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Day of the Moon - Two Small Girls

molsonite

Cadet
Newbie
I've watched the episode about 4 times.

The girl in the space suit is the same girl that appears to be regenerating in New York.

However, there's a different girl who is hiding in the hallway when the Doctor and Rory are in the girl's room trying to figure out what happened to Amy.

I originally thought they were the same girl, but I've rewatched it again and again. They are not the same girl.
 
Well, I've just rewound it and I think they look the same girl. She's alway seen in rather odd lighting, so that could mess with you perception; in the hallway, there's spooky lighting and the angle is low, but to me it looks like the same girl in the spacesuit and regenerating at the end.
 
It wouldn't make sense to set up the mystery of the little girl only to have it be two girls. They would have made it clearer if that were the case.
 
Yeah, I think it's just a trick of the light, and it's the same girl. Such a blatant attempt to misdirect the audience is so far over the top that it'd make even Agatha Christie blush, and she was the queen of suddenly introducing wholly new characters, (including look-alikes and evil twins), in the very last few pages of some of her stories, upon which to pin the dirty deed.
 
I have to concur - it's the same girl, especially as it's made clear the one in the hallway is the one who escaped the space suit, and the episode took pains to link the girl in the spacesuit to the girl in the photos. And there's no point introducing another character in New York. Though I think it's safe to assume another actress will be playing the role when next we see the character! (It'll be interesting to see if she's still a child.)

I know it would have telegraphed things too much - and we don't know if Moffat plans to go in that direction anyway - but wouldn't it have been cool if Caitlin Blackwood had been cast as the little girl? Nah ... from what I've read so many viewers have been suffering brain implosions from the concept of Doctor Who launching a season-long arc; they'd probably spontaneously combust if the little girl was Amelia! ;)

Alex
 
I wasn't sure either, but IMDB states that there's only one actress playing "small girl" - Sydney Wade. I would go and look at the credit sequence but frankly I can't be arsed.
 
they screwed up nixion was not president during the landing it was lendon johnson (correct the spelling if it is wrong ) nixion was'nt president till 1971 the year I was born. lol
 
my bad talking to my about the show and she said nixion was'nt in office till 71.
 
my bad talking to my about the show and she said nixion was'nt in office till 71.

Well, that's complete crap as someone else has stated. I was a child at the time, and I recall President Nixon talking to Armstrong and Aldrin during their EVA. I also recall Nixon being elected in '68 and taking office in '69. If anyone remembers otherwise they must have been living in an alternate timeline. :p
 
US House elections normally occur on even years with installation in January of the following year.
Senate elections are held at the same time, but since each state has two senators and terms are six years long there would normally be only one of the two elected at a time with neither elected some "federal"/even election years.
Presidential elections are held on leap years with installation in the following January. Early in our history presidential inaugurations were a couple of months later to allow for the gathering of electoral college votes via sailing ships and the primitive road system.
 
Actually, all the Moon landings occurred with Nixon was in office, during his first term.

Former Vice President Richard Nixon of California was elected President on 5 November 1968, defeating Democratic nominee Vice President Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota and former (and later future) Alabama Governor George Wallace of the American Independent Party. He assumed office on 20 January 1969.

Apollo 11's Eagle module landed on the Moon six months later, on 20 July 1969. Apollo 12 was launched on 14 November 1969 and landed on the Moon on 19 November. Apollo 13 launched on 11 April 1970 and of course never landed. Apollo 14 was launched on 31 January 1971 and landed on the Moon on 5 February. Apollo 15 was launched on 26 July 1971 and landed on the Moon on 30 July. Apollo 16 was launched on 16 April 1972 and landed on the Moon on 21 April. Nixon won re-election on 7 November 1972, defeating U.S. Senator George McGovern of South Dakota. Apollo 17, the last manned mission to the Moon so far, was launched on the subsequent 7 December and landed on 11 December.

Nixon began his second term on 20 January 1973. He resigned from office effective 12:00 PM Eastern Time on 9 August 1974, succeeded by Vice President Gerald Ford of Michigan, as a result of the Watergate scandal.

Since Doctor Who is a British show, I should probably mention that the U.K. Prime Ministers throughout this timeframe were Harold Wilson of the Labour Party, who held office from 16 October 1964 to 19 June 1970, and was therefore in office during the first Moon landing and in office during Apollo 12 and Apollo 13, and Sir Edward Heath of the Conservative Party, who held office from 19 June 1970 to 4 March 1974, serving during the rest of the Apollo missions.

This has been your vaguely useless historical trivia for the day.
 
Korby requests that Kirk beam down alone, explaining that he has made discoveries that may require an extraordinary decision on Kirk's part. But when he learns Christine Chapel, his fiancée, is aboard, he extends the invitation to include her.
 
Korby requests that Kirk beam down alone, explaining that he has made discoveries that may require an extraordinary decision on Kirk's part. But when he learns Christine Chapel, his fiancée, is aboard, he extends the invitation to include her.

Absolutely right.

Wait... what?

:wtf:
 
okhay well well well,,, so what about your " written off " you looser...i am not a spam person but my that post was understandable only for the rational people but not for you so back off.. :scream:
 
you were talking about a completely irrelevant episode of Star Trek in a Doctor Who forum. you might not be a spammer, but you're clearly not a poster paying attention to certain critical details like which forum you're in.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top