• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

David Fincher to direct 20k Leagues Under The Sea?

Hollywood has been in the remake and sequel business since the silent era. (There were at least three different versions of "Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde" in 1922 alone.) Complaining about Hollywood making remakes is kind of like complaining that the sun rises in the east or that the tide comes in. It's the nature of the beast.

Precisely. Remaking movies is a well-worn tradition in Hollywood. There's nothing wrong with it so long as the remake brings something new or interesting to the proceedings.

For example, while Gus Van Sant's shot-for-shot remake of Psycho was a peculiar experiment, it the end it felt like a waste of time. Had that film explored some new territory (like doing the film from the POV of Norman Bates) it could have been compelling, but instead it was just... redundant.
 
We've been remaking films for a while now, and will always continue to do so.

Deal with it.


Article 218 of the Internet Charter of Rights allows fanboys to bitch about insginificant things with wafer-thin arguments that lack logic or thought.

"Deal with it."
 
Yes. And the movie on your list that I even remotely liked was The Dark Knight anyway.


Which was a sequel to a remake of a movie based on a comic book . . . .

Fun movie, though.

I'm a hipocrite to my own beliefs. I was wondering how long before someone picked up on that.

Still, though I saw it in theatres and enjoyed it, my convictions prevent me from getting the DVD. For now.
 
We've been remaking films for a while now, and will always continue to do so.

Deal with it.


Article 218 of the Internet Charter of Rights allows fanboys to bitch about insginificant things with wafer-thin arguments that lack logic or thought.

"Deal with it."

Which is funny, since you are essentially doing the same. Complaining about a process in Hollywood which has been going on for decades, and will continue to go on regardless of your complaints.

For example, the Al Pacino version of Scarface (a classic in its own right) was a remake of an earlier 1932 film. Yasujirō Ozu remade his own film A Story of Floating Weeds and Alfred Hitchcock remade his 1934 black and white film The Man Who Knew Too Much in color in 1956. And so on and so on.

Remaking is a long-time tradition in Hollywood, and it has most of the times yielded very interesting results. The Pacino version of Scarface is a modern-day classic. I thought the American versions of Seven Samurai and Infernal Affairs were actually on some level better than their Japanese and Chinese predecessors.

I would hardly dismiss remakes on a whole, which is narrow-minded thinking.
 
remakes out of control

I'm looking forward to David Fincher projects.
My ultimate dream would be if Fincher directed a remake of Soylent Green (1973) with Brad Pitt starring

as it is in development: Soylent Green (2012)


Hollywood has been in the remake and sequel business since the silent era.
Here is a good example of remakes:
Just thought I'd mention "The Three Musketeers" has been done this many times for feature film cinema release in USA:
The Three Musketeers (1993)
The Three Musketeers (1973) AKA "The Three Musketeers: The Queen's Diamonds" - UK
The Three Musketeers (1948) AKA "Alexandre Dumas' The Three Musketeers"
The Three Musketeers (1939) (as a musical comedy)
The Three Musketeers (1935)
The Three Musketeers (1933)
The Three Musketeers (1921)
The Three Musketeers (1916)
The Three Musketeers (1914)


also The Musketeer (2001)

and now Doug Liman will be directing Three Musketeers (2012).
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top