• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

David Bradley Reprising the First Doctor for Big Finish

I like the fact that they're making is a seperate entity from their "Early Adventures" releases.

So with the 1st and 3rd Doctors recast (and 9, 10 & 11 too, sort of), will they go for 2 as well? Frazer Hines Pat Troughton is so uncanny there'd seem to be little point.

Frazier is also 72 and has had bouts with cancer. They're strictly on borrowed time with all the surviving Companions of 1-4 at this point; it's hit the stage of either recast or retire the early Doctors/Companions entirely. So yeah, I reckon we'll 'see' a new 2 fairly soon. And then a new Brigadier and maybe a new Sarah Jane.

This guy's Troughton is uncanny and he already writes, produces and performs his own series of Second Doctor fan-audio adventures. Here, he performs Two and Twelve.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

He has also collaborated with other impressionists on several multi-Doctor episodes.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
Ugh, no, that's enormously dumber. Besides, it makes me think of a certain Marxist, anti-colonial revolutionary writer-philosopher.
That's going a bit far, especially considering how none else in this forum would've otherwise made such a connection.

And I don't count what happened in tie-ins because there are multiple incompatible continuities among the tie-ins, so none of them provides an unambiguous "explanation" for anything. Doctor Who's "reality," both in screen canon and beyond, has always been too mutable for it to be treated as an actual, logically consistent universe.
Honestly, I don't agree. There are certain lines of continuity that DW will never cross, and really only has the show stepped on its own toes (Atlantis, I know), and even then, it was the rare misttep that was totally justifiable in an age where these stories were just fables of the mind, fleetingly remembered after once watched. But as I've been reviewing the show from the 70's through the mid 80's myself, its amazing, to me, how consistent in its history it actually is. And BF has had a pretty steady record on its own by not quite sidestepping on the show's toes, but regardless, I think the show itself has had an amazing consistency on-screen. And that's before the fandom exploded in the 80's, ultimately helping in ruining the show.
 
I dunno about this, since for me, the least successful part of Bradley's Hartnell impression is his voice. His timbre and speech rhythms are just too different from Hartnell's. Seeing him onscreen, with the physical resemblance and expressions being reasonably close, I can tolerate the vocal mismatch, but with nothing but his voice, I don't think it'd work for me at all.

Agreed. It made the surprise reveal in "The Doctor Falls" an odd moment for me since we only hear his voice at first.

The War Chief is not The Master. I'll admit that, halfway through a War Games rewatch I wish he was (War Master would work just as well as a title), but he dies, and while Terrance Dicks tweaks that in the New Adventures he then makes it clear the Chief is not The Master.

Well, dying isn't really an impediment. All we see is that the War Lord's men shot him and dragged him out of the room. He easily could have regenerated after that.

In fact, Terrance Dicks' "Timewyrm: Exodus" makes it clear that that's exactly what happened to the War Chief. Although he also establishes that the regeneration failed, turning him into a hideously deformed multi-limbed mutant, who is most definitely NOT the Master. And as far as I'm concerned, if Terrance Dicks says something about Doctor Who, it's probably true. (The only point with which I disagree is when he says that Susan is not his biological granddaughter.)

The "Planet of Fire" death was as conclusive as it gets -- he was literally vaporized on camera -- and yet he was back a year later without a word of explanation.

I just chalk it up to writer fiat and Ainley's deliciously arrogant performance when he delivers the line, "I'm indestructible. The whole universe knows that." :D

Rewatching War Games, the odd thing is that Bree, Brayshaw and Madoc seem to be in entirely different productions. Brayshaw seems understated and realistic against Bree's abrupt staccato performance, but then Madoc arrives, asserting his effortless superiority by lounging around on the furniture, and Brayshaw seems stiff and OTT in comparison to him.

Part of what I like is that they all carry such different flavors and have such differing agendas. Their performances are a huge part of what sustains that story over 10 episodes.

But Madoc is truly phenomenal in his understated performance. But, IMO, he was just as good and seemed to be having just as much fun giving a more over-the-top performance as Solon in "The Brain of Morbius."

Fanon. Headcanon doesn't make any sense, anyway.

I thought they meant different things. I figured, in order for something to be "fanon," it needed to have some kind of wider acceptance in the fan community, to the point where it appears in multiple unrelated fanfictions and even professional tie-in comics & novels. "Headcanon," on the other hand, is how one person views a particular element of continuity that may not be shared by anyone else. Each person's "headcanon" is probably slightly different from everyone else's.

Example:
Season 6B is a long accepted piece of "fanon" used to explain the 2nd Doctor's appearances in "The Five Doctors" & "The Two Doctors."
My theory that Susan was a bisexual 50-year-old who pretended to be helpless as a way of flirting with the other companions is pure "headcanon."
 
Maybe the first The Master can massacre a whole village and then The Doctor can let him escape while laughing about how much fun their next adventure together would be.

Just like in the good old days.
 
I thought they meant different things. I figured, in order for something to be "fanon," it needed to have some kind of wider acceptance in the fan community, to the point where it appears in multiple unrelated fanfictions and even professional tie-in comics & novels. "Headcanon," on the other hand, is how one person views a particular element of continuity that may not be shared by anyone else. Each person's "headcanon" is probably slightly different from everyone else's.

While I'm not fond of either term (since "canon" by definition means the official thing as opposed to variant individual interpretations), I think you're right about the distinction in how they're used.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top