• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Damage to the Enterprise D 6 foot model

I had left the show, and was working elsewhere, when I heard a story about the large 6 foot Enterprise model, and the fact that it was really damaged. [...] A short time later, I found out that Greg Jein had been commissioned to build a smaller, 4 foot version of the Enterprise-D
You once said that your last episode was Yesterday's Enterprise, but that came well after the four-footer became the go-to filming model. So they were already using it for several months before you were no longer working there. :vulcan:
 
I had left the show, and was working elsewhere, when I heard a story about the large 6 foot Enterprise model, and the fact that it was really damaged. [...] A short time later, I found out that Greg Jein had been commissioned to build a smaller, 4 foot version of the Enterprise-D
You once said that your last episode was Yesterday's Enterprise, but that came well after the four-footer became the go-to filming model. So they were already using it for several months before you were no longer working there. :vulcan:

;)
 
I just hope that whoever bought these models is taking good care of them now.

When I first read this thread, I assumed somebodies 3 year old had "discovered" one...
 
I had left the show, and was working elsewhere, when I heard a story about the large 6 foot Enterprise model, and the fact that it was really damaged. [...] A short time later, I found out that Greg Jein had been commissioned to build a smaller, 4 foot version of the Enterprise-D
You once said that your last episode was Yesterday's Enterprise, but that came well after the four-footer became the go-to filming model. So they were already using it for several months before you were no longer working there. :vulcan:


I have no idea on the timeline for that, since I was not privy to it's construction or use.
 
I understand the convenience of having a smaller model with more apparent surface detail, but it looks like the model was rushed.

They were probably counting on the low resolution of SD broadcasts to mask some of these imperfections. The kind of imperfections we are now seeing in HD would probably have been imperceptible on TVs of the time.
 
Not to mention the addition of the 10 forward windows was a ret-conning of the ship design. Probert only intended for that area to be one deck high.
 
I had left the show, and was working elsewhere, when I heard a story about the large 6 foot Enterprise model, and the fact that it was really damaged. [...] A short time later, I found out that Greg Jein had been commissioned to build a smaller, 4 foot version of the Enterprise-D
You once said that your last episode was Yesterday's Enterprise, but that came well after the four-footer became the go-to filming model. So they were already using it for several months before you were no longer working there. :vulcan:


I have no idea on the timeline for that, since I was not privy to it's construction or use.

Perhaps you should better consider your words then when you compose libelous posts against others who worked on the show long after you left it.
 
I had left the show, and was working elsewhere, when I heard a story about the large 6 foot Enterprise model, and the fact that it was really damaged. [...] A short time later, I found out that Greg Jein had been commissioned to build a smaller, 4 foot version of the Enterprise-D
You once said that your last episode was Yesterday's Enterprise, but that came well after the four-footer became the go-to filming model. So they were already using it for several months before you were no longer working there. :vulcan:

Not to mention the anecdote about being on set for the "nude" scenes in Menage a Troi, several months later. Unless we're expected to believe the set was not only open, but ex-employees could walk around.
 
The 4 foot model was actually more detailed than the 6 footer, even to the point that that it properly depicted the 10-forward windows.
I don't care about the 10 Forward windows, the 4 footer is a fat and ugly version of the D.

Not to mention the addition of the 10 forward windows was a ret-conning of the ship design. Probert only intended for that area to be one deck high.
I wish people would stop talking about Probert's intentions as if they mean anything, the saucer rim is two decks, end of story. It wasn't a retcon because the rim was never established as only one deck.

I'm sure many people intended many things but if it doesn't end up on screen it doesn't matter.
 
I wish people would stop talking about Probert's intentions as if they mean anything, the saucer rim is two decks, end of story. It wasn't a retcon because the rim was never established as only one deck.

I'm sure many people intended many things but if it doesn't end up on screen it doesn't matter.

Then that begets the question of why they modified the saucer edge on the 4 footer in the first place?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top