They don't have to spoil the whole movie. Just at least give us concrete info. It's stupid to keep doing this and keep us guessing even though I'm sure they think they're clever and it's better for us.Or you could just wait and find out when you see the movie.
Neither does not knowing.They don't have to spoil the whole movie. Just at least give us concrete info. It's stupid to keep doing this and keep us guessing even though I'm sure they think they're clever and it's better for us.Or you could just wait and find out when you see the movie.
Knowing some stuff doesn't spoil an experience necessarily.
There's a little bit from Cumberbatch which isn't quoted, but they get the bulk of what he says - all of the important bits are there, I think. Rather than anything which was omitted from the text, I suspect Legion was referring to the part where Cumberbatch said:Not in the least, because Cumberbatch elaborates to indicate that he's not talking about literal "powers" like mind control or telekinesis.
Really? Was that in the video (that I cannot see from my location)? It isn't in the text of the accompanying article.He's particularly adept at suggestion and persuasion, sounds like.B.C. said:He can sow an idea, which is as powerful as gunshots or close-hand combat, which he's masterful in.
The people's of Earth that defeated him in the Eugenic Wars.Would Khan have a cause that we may feel empathy for, as Cumberbatch says the character does?
And on whom is this Khan seeking vengeance?
Using his superior intellect. The details are unimportant but he is a character likely to adapt quickly to his environment. You can see how quickly he is able to take over starfleet ships.And how does he get into Starfleet (or at least the "organization," as it's said in the synopsis)?
Cos he is nice (pre TWOK) or the father of the girl has some important position he needs to exploit.Why does he want to save a little girl?
Could poor John Harrison be possesed by Redjack?
Star Trek is often about whats happening in the real world, only with the "serial numbers" filed off. Escapism wasn't really its goal.A political terrorist? So much for the great 'escapism' that is Star Trek!
That's pretty lame. Revenge, terrorists, etc. It's like a skipping record with this shit.
I rewatched Trek 09 last night and enjoyed it but thought to myself... I wish there was something really different happening this time besides someone bent on revenge, etc. Who knows? Once the full 9 minutes have been previewed maybe it'll be clear what's happening.
Mental powers, huh? Well, that rules Khan out.
They don't have to spoil the whole movie. Just at least give us concrete info. It's stupid to keep doing this and keep us guessing even though I'm sure they think they're clever and it's better for us.Or you could just wait and find out when you see the movie.
Knowing some stuff doesn't spoil an experience necessarily.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.