Say what you like about their editorial policy, but the Daily Mail is far less likely to make up outright bollocks than, say, The Sun. You think they'd make up the quotes from Cumberbatch himself too?
I don't think they made up the quotes, because the quotes in the article are quite minimal. I do think they selectively spun them, however, to reach a conclusion unsupported by Cumberbatch's quip.Say what you like about their editorial policy, but the Daily Mail is far less likely to make up outright bollocks than, say, The Sun. You think they'd make up the quotes from Cumberbatch himself too?
If we keep up the duality of the current Doctor, as RTD started, then he would be a perfect Master against Smith's similar frame...![]()
He could also be a terrific Master that way opposite Smith.
And, as a side note, I've been bursting trying not to throw my personal opinion in as far as this Cumberbatch guy, as I haven't seen Sherlock yet. But, man is he fugly! I hate to say that, and please understand I am in no way as shallow as to rate his looks over his acting talent. I'm sure he's a brilliant actor. But, thank GOD he's not The Doctor! He's just too damn ugly for me. Just for me! Sorry.
If we keep up the duality of the current Doctor, as RTD started, then he would be a perfect Master against Smith's similar frame...![]()
He could also be a terrific Master that way opposite Smith.
![]()
I certainly don't think Cumberbatch is ugly though. That said, people often look different in motion. Seeing some still pics of Matt Smith used to make me think "bloody hell", whereas in motion he's quite pleasing to watch. You've not seen Sherlock; have you ever seen Cumberbatch in anything else?
"Cumberbatch" still sounds like a Lewis Carroll monster.
Weren't people saying that about Matt Smith before the series started?
I hate to say that, and please understand I am in no way as shallow as to rate his looks over his acting talent. I'm sure he's a brilliant actor.
Nah if it were up to me I'd be cleverer in making the MAster a reflection of Smith. Rather than another youngish man who's slightly old fashioned in his ways and has crazy hair, I'd go for an old actor who's actually very young in his mannerisms.
I wouldn't mind that as long as he's toned down a little bit back to the Harold Saxon version (no skeletor), and he regenerates into a new Master during the story...Heck what do any of us know though, if 11 does meet the MAster it might well just be Simm again.
Oh well sure, in a perfect world it's James Nesbitt going psycho. I'm just saying if they stick with the whole reflection thing. I wouldn't mind some deviation. A regeneration The Master doesn't control?
That strikes an interesting side-note in me: Is The Doctor the only Time Lord we've seen regenerate that cannot control the outcome? Romana can and The Master obviously could.
"Cumberbatch" still sounds like a Lewis Carroll monster.
Yes, I've joined the 1.6 million other disciples who now follow Mr Fry's tweets.. <hangs head in shame>@Markgatiss Mark! At last you're on twitter. I knew you'd succumb in the end. Congrats on Sherlock. Saw it on iPlayer via proxy. Brilliant.
God, why? I find him insufferable. I think the best description of Stephen Fry I've seen is "a stupid person's idea of what a clever person is like".Yes, I've joined the 1.6 million other disciples who now follow Mr Fry's tweets.. <hangs head in shame>
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.