• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Creating A Planet

If you want another Earth-sized planet in the Sol system, look no further than Venus. Even with its super-heat, it's probably more suitable for colonization than anything in the Kuiper belt.

Hmmm, if we move the Kuiper Belt "planet" to Venus would could us the ice from it to cool down Venus!
IIRC, the thought is that Venus is mostly covered in liquid. Great place to park a houseboat.
 
If you want another Earth-sized planet in the Sol system, look no further than Venus. Even with its super-heat, it's probably more suitable for colonization than anything in the Kuiper belt.

Hmmm, if we move the Kuiper Belt "planet" to Venus would could us the ice from it to cool down Venus!
IIRC, the thought is that Venus is mostly covered in liquid. Great place to park a houseboat.

I thought Venus had essentially no liquid on its surface, due to the high temperatures? It would take enormous pressure to keep anything in a liquid state there.
 
A planet-sized object in the Kuiper Belt is going to be little more than a large chunk of ice. There may be some minerals or other useful resources and elements there but from the planet the Sun is barely going to be distinguishable from any other star in the sky. In short, the object's surface temperature is going to be somewhere between "really damn cold" and "so damn cold all atmoic motion in your body comes screeching to a halt."

Actually, no. If it formed there, then it would be. But as I said, current thinking is that dozens of planets may have formed in the inner system and been ejected by Jovian migration. There could be planets out there with size and composition similiar to Venus, Earth, and Mars. And large planets have internal heat, cores that are molten due to the heat of their formation and the radioisotopes they contain. The larger the planet, the longer it takes to cool off. As I believe I already mentioned up above, it's possible that a trans-Neptunian planet, or even a rogue planet ejected entirely into interstellar space, could retain internal heat for billions of years. It could theoretically be habitable on the surface, or at the very least could have life-bearing oceans under a crust of ice.


Oh, and just being the same size as the Earth doesn't guarantee Earth-like gravity.

Well, yes, if its density is different, there would be variations in the level of gravity. But if we're talking about a planet of terrestrial composition, i.e. mostly silicates and metal like a planet formed in the inner system rather than largely made of ice like a body formed further out, then there wouldn't be that much variation in the possible gravity.

Now, Earth is basically 67.5% silicates and 32.5% iron (to simplify). If a planet of Earth's mass were made entirely of silicates, it would have a radius 1.04 times that of Earth and a surface gravity of 0.925g. If a one-Earth-mass planet were 70% iron like Mercury, it would have a radius 0.88 times Earth's and a surface gravity of 1.29g. So we're not talking about that huge a swing in gravity levels. The only way an Earth-sized planet would be wildly different from Earth gravity is if it were made mostly of ice, which isn't going to happen if it was formed in the inner system.


IIRC, the thought is that Venus is mostly covered in liquid. Great place to park a houseboat.

:wtf: Uhh, yeah, that was the thought fifty years ago, before we used radar to map its surface and sent probes to land there. We've known since the 1960s that Venus is the driest place in the Solar System, hellishly hot and arid.
 
:wtf: Uhh, yeah, that was the thought fifty years ago, before we used radar to map its surface and sent probes to land there. We've known since the 1960s that Venus is the driest place in the Solar System, hellishly hot and arid.

Guess I've been out of the loop. Oh well, it sounds like a terrific place to build an A-frame :lol:
 
:wtf: Uhh, yeah, that was the thought fifty years ago, before we used radar to map its surface and sent probes to land there. We've known since the 1960s that Venus is the driest place in the Solar System, hellishly hot and arid.

Guess I've been out of the loop. Oh well, it sounds like a terrific place to build an A-frame :lol:

Better have some nifty materials since Venus is hot enough melt lead. ;)
 
:wtf: Uhh, yeah, that was the thought fifty years ago, before we used radar to map its surface and sent probes to land there. We've known since the 1960s that Venus is the driest place in the Solar System, hellishly hot and arid.

Guess I've been out of the loop. Oh well, it sounds like a terrific place to build an A-frame :lol:

Better have some nifty materials since Venus is hot enough melt lead. ;)

Should have picked a better metal. Lead has a relatively low melting temperature :lol:
 
:wtf: Uhh, yeah, that was the thought fifty years ago, before we used radar to map its surface and sent probes to land there. We've known since the 1960s that Venus is the driest place in the Solar System, hellishly hot and arid.


Bet the SUN is drier! *heh*
 
Any extra normal matter added to a neutron star will be smashed and the atomic nuclei will be ground up into the constituent neutrons and protons making it into more neutron star material.
 
:wtf: Uhh, yeah, that was the thought fifty years ago, before we used radar to map its surface and sent probes to land there. We've known since the 1960s that Venus is the driest place in the Solar System, hellishly hot and arid.

Guess I've been out of the loop. Oh well, it sounds like a terrific place to build an A-frame :lol:

Better have some nifty materials since Venus is hot enough melt lead. ;)

The 200 atmosphere air pressure and sulphuric acid in said atmosphere doesn't help either.
 
Being nearly all hydrogen, isn't it technically 2/3rds water? ;)

Yeah, in the same sense the space shuttle runs off water since it's fuel tanks are H2. ;)

So I'll install thermal pane windows.

Just make sure you have a nice Wagner Powerwasher. You don't want to know what sulfuric acid rain can do to vinyl siding.
 
A planet-sized object in the Kuiper Belt is going to be little more than a large chunk of ice.
I guess there's no need for us to actually explore the Kupier Belt as you seem to know all about what's there already.

Why can't large rocky planets be hiding out there?

---------------
 
Wouldn't any large bodies (I mean planet sized or approaching planet-sized) bodies just about ANYWHERE in the solar system reveal themselves based on their gravitational influence if they were rocky or even much more than just balls of loosely congealed slush?
 
:wtf: Uhh, yeah, that was the thought fifty years ago, before we used radar to map its surface and sent probes to land there. We've known since the 1960s that Venus is the driest place in the Solar System, hellishly hot and arid.

Guess I've been out of the loop. Oh well, it sounds like a terrific place to build an A-frame :lol:

Although an awful lot of the water from its oceans is still in the atmos, so the story isn't as simple as it's being painted here.
 
Last edited:
Being nearly all hydrogen, isn't it technically 2/3rds water? ;)

No. Water is a molecule consisting of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom. Take away the oxygen and it isn't water anymore, it's just hydrogen.

Well, if we're nitpicking, given the typical ionization state, the Sun is roughly 73% protons and 25% alpha particles by mass (based on the photospheric composition). :p ;)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top