• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Could The Hobbit trilogy be reduced to a single film?


Nice to know, I'll be avoiding that fanwank like the plague.

Funny how nerds always think they know so much more than professionals.

All of the stuff he (she?) cut out was PJ fan-wanking, so I hardly see the difference.

As Professor Zoom said, the only difference is that the professional got paid. For all we know, this person could actually be a professional. He/She must have connections in order to have already aquired a copy of BotFA.
 
The other thing is, if you're going to make a four quadrant movie that appeals to women, the perception is (for better or for worse) that you need to have romance and female characters in it. The Hobbit book doesn't have any women or romance in it, and thus it had to be invented. It's the same reason we had those endless scenes of Arwen pining for Aragorn in the LOTR movies.

I'm probably in the minority on this, but I wish they kept Arwen in Helm's Deep. At least then she would have been contributing directly to the story and could have been part of the army. They had Elrond's sons with them in the book, so why not her? (not at Helm's Deep, I know, but later)

sometimes I think things are left best the way they are. Yes there were no women and all but the book was written in the 30s. In the 60s all the leads in TOS are men but that has never stop people from enjoying the film.

Jackson tried to hard to modernised it that is became just awkward to watch.
 
Yeah, I'll be sticking with the perfectly legal acceptable 3 DVD's and or Blurays rather than fan shit.
 
I do agree that King Kong was ridiculously padded. With Tolkein, you have the right (and the obligation) to throw as much stuff in there as possible because you have the source material. But King Kong? Really? We need to spend an hour with an actor and a director before they even get to the damn island?

Anything was better the the supposedly 'classic' (to some people) 1976 version that couldn't bother to use stop-motion, but a guy in a suit (after a mechanical Kong failed and could only work a little bit.) The padding added a great non-white character and his young white friend that looks up to him, as well as give us characters to care about.

Three hours is too long? And too much time was spend getting to know the most important characters and two minor ones? IMHO, I`d love to see that more in fantasy & sci-fi films that what we get now (imagine if the 2009 Star Trek movie was that long? We would get more about Amanda Grayson that what we got thus making her death even more tragic, and the reason why Nero was trapped for 20 years before retrieving Spock Prime, thus making the movie a bit more understandable.) Too bad people in the film-making and film exhibition industry are greedy.

With regards to The Hobbit trilogy, we have seen the way forward for adapting long works to the screen,and a way for them to not be denuded to fit an arbitrary two hour running time. I`d love to see more like it (perhaps for a movie version of Dune?)
 
Last edited:
No one will sit through a 5 hour movie.
who is going to sit down for FOUR AND A HALF HOURS without a break?
I would, on a lazy Sunday maybe, but I'm not quite right in the head. I'm one of those lunatics who thinks the SEE versions of LotR are just right. ;)


The people who sat through marathon showings of the LOTR trilogy when it was done by Famous Players (now Cineplex) in Canada would like a word with you three.
 
No one will sit through a 5 hour movie.
who is going to sit down for FOUR AND A HALF HOURS without a break?
I would, on a lazy Sunday maybe, but I'm not quite right in the head. I'm one of those lunatics who thinks the SEE versions of LotR are just right. ;)
The people who sat through marathon showings of the LOTR trilogy when it was done by Famous Players (now Cineplex) in Canada would like a word with you three.
Also, the people who watch The Return of the King Extended Edition.
 
I for one only own the extended editions of all three LOTR films and wouldn't watch them any other way. But even they have a break (disc change) in the middles.
 
SPCTRE said:
I'm one of those lunatics who thinks the SEE versions of LotR are just right. ;)

I resemble that.

Shaka Zulu said:
The people who sat through marathon showings of the LOTR trilogy when it was done by Famous Players (now Cineplex) in Canada would like a word with you three.

It seems they did some kind of trilogy marathon for The Hobbit ( in the US at least ).
 
I for one only own the extended editions of all three LOTR films and wouldn't watch them any other way. But even they have a break (disc change) in the middles.
I'm the same way, but who says you can't have a break in the middle of this fan edit? There is such thing as a pause button.
 
Even on the extended editions Jackson says in the commentaries about watching the extended versions over two nights.
 
I for one only own the extended editions of all three LOTR films and wouldn't watch them any other way. But even they have a break (disc change) in the middles.
I went to Trilogy Tuesday in 2003. Pavlov would have been proud to see all the people who got up to use the restroom at exactly the point where you have to change the discs during the EE's of the first two films.

And for the record, there were breaks between the films. And pizza!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top