• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Could Star Trek V been saved?

You seem to think that I believe Shatner went to the Paramount executives and said "I want to make a movie all about how great Kirk is, and everyone else plays second fiddle to him."

Shatner wanted to make a movie that was an allegory for the dangers of believing television evangelists. That was his general, basic idea. It wasn't a very good idea, but it was his idea nonetheless. What we ended up with was a nonsensical plot, bad acting, a subpar villain, and a movie focusing almost entirely on Kirk despite the revelation that Spock has a brother we never knew about for 30 years. Deep down, did Shatner really just want to make a self-serving movie? Probably not consciously. Subconsciously? Who knows. But that's how it came across to me.

Shatner can believe whatever he wants. He still believes to this day that his film is great and that it only lacked better VFX to make it a true masterpiece. And he's entitled to his opinion. I have mine.
Do you think that the shat may have been influenced unconsciously by The Way to Eden? Perhaps he recalled the rough concept of that story which also involved a cult like leader. If so, he didn’t pick the best episode to leverage for inspiration.
 
Besides, Gene Roddenberry wouldn't make that a negative reason for them. It would make them "free" as a couple. Much like when he married Majel. "We have our own agreement."
I cannot think of something I care less about than what Gene Roddenberry's possible opinion of my headcanon would have been.
 
Last edited:
I don’t buy into the idea that Kirk not succumbing to Sybok’s influence was about Shatner trying to make Kirk look awesome.
Despite what I said earlier about some of Shatner's motivations in making the movie (to make Kirk look strong, but not to make others look weak), I really like your interpretation.

If the story is about Kirk, having Kirk be the one to resist Sybok makes sense. (I actually think the rock-climbing scene is great because of the fact that Kirk has pushed himself and almost falls, though.)

I have a bigger problem with the way Kirk acts in the shuttle hangar and in the brig, though. In real life I could see a person be this angry, but since I very much agree that TOS shows starship captains seeming "larger than life," I really think he should have handled being taken captive with more grace.
 
I have a bigger problem with the way Kirk acts in the shuttle hangar and in the brig, though. In real life I could see a person be this angry, but since I very much agree that TOS shows starship captains seeming "larger than life," I really think he should have handled being taken captive with more grace.
My problem with those scenes are:

1. Spock didn't shoot because he said Kirk ordered him to kill his brother. Just because Sybok pressed his chest (where his heart ain't) up to the barrel doesn't mean Spock couldn't have fired LONG before then and incapacitate him. Or shoved him back and then shot him, etc.

2. The argument in the brig was, as most of the tense scenes in this and the next film, deflated by jokes. "You made that up" and how Kirk reacts directly following is like watching a 4th grader argue with an adult.
 
Do you think that the shat may have been influenced unconsciously by The Way to Eden? Perhaps he recalled the rough concept of that story which also involved a cult like leader. If so, he didn’t pick the best episode to leverage for inspiration.

I doubt The Way to Eden was a factor, at all.
 
Or shoved him back and then shot him
Or overpowered him in some other way, or just let Sybok's followers know he was going to shoot him if they did not stand down, or any number of other things that would have made more sense than the rather strange idea that Spock must choose between killing Sybok, regardless of their relationship, and letting the crew of refugees take over the ship.

I get that the moment was supposed to be "Spock's loyalty put to the test," but Nimoy does not play it that way. The refuges could have taken over the ship in a different way: sneaking through access conduits, etc. that would have made more sense.
 
Let's be honest though. Star Trek, in all its iterations, has a habit of showing it being WAY too easy to take over whatever the hero starship or space station is.
I think my biggest frustration with TFF is that everything is too easy. The ambassadors are taken hostage too easily, the Enterprise is overtaken too easily, and the alien gets wrestled then blown up.

It's all kind of meh.
 
Or overpowered him in some other way, or just let Sybok's followers know he was going to shoot him if they did not stand down, or any number of other things that would have made more sense than the rather strange idea that Spock must choose between killing Sybok, regardless of their relationship, and letting the crew of refugees take over the ship.
That raises an interesting question: Have we ever seen a Vulcan use a neck pinch against another Vulcan?
 
Most of the best parts of "The Way to Eden" are when Dr. Sevrin is monologuing and conversing with either Spock or McCoy. These parts are as good as what's in any episode.

Unless there happen to be statements out there to the contrary from the parties involved, I don't think the episode had anything to do with the development of STV, though.

The concepts of Eden and of cults transcend the third season episode. :techman:
 
It just set up pointless drama. About 2 seconds of "they just blew up our transporters but we'll just ask nicely if we can borrow theirs through the power of friendship" or something.

Just that subplot is dumb. Klaa's mission wasn't "sanctioned" but he's all of a sudden deferential to authority?
I assumed he was a relative of Koord, based on the ridge pattern. Maybe Koord his his father or head of his House. Though I think the House thing was created in TNG,
 
Most of the best parts of "The Way to Eden" are when Dr. Sevrin is monologuing and conversing with either Spock or McCoy. These parts are as good as what's in any episode.

Unless there happen to be statements out there to the contrary from the parties involved, I don't think the episode had anything to do with the development of STV, though.

The concepts of Eden and of cults transcend the third season episode. :techman:
I’m sure you’re correct…. I was just throwing out the wild and unsubstantiated speculation that maybe somewhere deep in Shatners psyche he sort of remembered that episode and unconsciously emulated the rough theme.

I mean, it happens. I wrote this amazing play called hamnet only to learn that some scoundrel copied it (albeit a few hundred years earlier ). Damn that Shakespeare guy. What a plagiarist.
 
I’m sure you’re correct…. I was just throwing out the wild and unsubstantiated speculation that maybe somewhere deep in Shatners psyche he sort of remembered that episode and unconsciously emulated the rough theme.

I mean, it happens. I wrote this amazing play called hamnet only to learn that some scoundrel copied it (albeit a few hundred years earlier ). Damn that Shakespeare guy. What a plagiarist.
Tolkien ripped off Rowling too much for my liking.

Also, you should try hamming up your script to make it different than the other hack.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top