"Choose Your Pain" Klingon ship (Visual spoilers?)

[Kemaiku]

Picard's old ship, the Stargazer, was Constellation-class, wasn't it?

Kor

Yes.

 

[alex08060]

The Klingons in Into Darkness and Discovery look nothing alike.

And no, just because Discovery used this design doesn't mean a possible 4th movie will.

I saw the Klingon scene in the movie, looks almost the same
As the Klingons in discovery.

 

[Mirror Mirror]

Paramount probably has the right to make the movies, but CBS owns everything that comes out of those movies under the Star Trek Banner.

Like, if you look at any Star Trek product, they all say Star Trek is owned by CBS.

Sounds reasonable. I concede to your point.

 

[GilmourD]

I am enjoying watching the nitpick TOS diehards cry and squirm that their beloved cardboard props are being replaced with high quality designs.

Call the waaahhhhmbulance. I'll sit back and enjoy the show.

To me it's the equivalent of this:

Dog:

Cat:

Human:

Heidi Klum:

2013 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500:

 

[Tuskin38]

I saw the Klingon scene in the movie, looks almost the same
As the Klingons in discovery.

No they don’t

The ridges are nothing alike

 

[nutshell]

No they don’t

The ridges are nothing alike

Extremely similar, IMO.

 

[Tuskin38]

Extremely similar, IMO.

No? Not at all.

 

[nutshell]

No? Not at all.

It's my opinion. You don't have to agree with it. Your disagreement doesn't make my opinion wrong.

 

[Tuskin38]

It's my opinion. You don't have to agree with it. Your disagreement doesn't make my opinion wrong.

But there is physical/visual evidence

 

[nutshell]

But there is physical/visual evidence

That I find extremely similar.

 

[Tuskin38]

That I find extremely similar.

The into darkness Klingons have a full head of ridges, while Disocvery’s only gave them in the centre and have a bunch of other details all around them.

 

[Brainsucker]

I don't care whatever CBS said, but I decide that this is a reboot.

 

[Shawnster]

I don't care whatever CBS said, but I decide that this is a reboot.

It is easier that way.

I like the term visual reboot, too.

 

[alex08060]

The Movie Klingons are obviously more detail and we only see one Klingon, kind of sucks what Klingons look like now but the trekk lore should not have been changed.

 

[Mudd]

It's my opinion. You don't have to agree with it. Your disagreement doesn't make my opinion wrong.

No, but yours is unobservant.

That's a fact

 

[nutshell]

The into darkness Klingons have a full head of ridges, while Disocvery’s only gave them in the centre and have a bunch of other details all around them.

Klingon ridges always vary. The ones in discovery are closer to Into Darkness than other Trek.

 

[nutshell]

No, but yours is unobservant.

That's a fact

Wow. What a bunch of whiners and haters and holier than thou trolls. Just because you say it doesn't make it so. I looked at pics recently and stand by my statement. Perhaps yours is the unobservanet position.

 

[nutshell]

FACT: Klingon ridges have ALWAYS varied.

 

[Mirror Mirror]

It's my opinion. You don't have to agree with it. Your disagreement doesn't make my opinion wrong.

It makes you wrong when the actual evidence is not in your favor. They do not look alike or even close to alike. Now some of the rejected busts look close, but the DSC and kelvin designs are as far apart as the TMP and TNG designs.

 

[nutshell]

It makes you wrong when the actual evidence is not in your favor. They do not look alike or even close to alike. Now some of the rejected busts look close, but the DSC and kelvin designs are as far apart as the TMP and TNG designs.

The pictures disagree with you. Bald. Ridges. Slopped. Almost covered ears. Ridges always varies. Etc.