• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Chekov?

We wouldn't be having this discussion if Chekov weren't one of the very few TOS characters who had an established birthdate. He says he's 22 in "Who Mourns for Adonais", which takes place in the second season, within ten stardates of "The Deadly Years" where we learn Kirk is 34.

We have no idea how old Uhura or Sulu might be. But Chekov's age is well known in TOS, if not in terms of calendar dates, then in terms of how it compares to Kirk's. So if the movie Kirk and movie Chekov aren't separated by twelve years of age, then there's cause to get nerdy...

Of course, the bulk of the action takes place in 2258, when Kirk is twenty-five, so Pavel Chekov should be thirteen rather than seventeen in order to meet the exacting TOS criteria. Since he doesn't, well, he's a somewhat different person. Which is perfectly okay as such. We might just as well argue that we are indeed looking at the older brother, who in this universe wasn't named Piotr but Pavel, and that both universes always featured both brothers despite Sulu's ignorance of the fact in "Day of the Dove".

For me, the angle of interest here is whether we can use STXI to provide further information about our TOS heroes, or whether we have to accept said heroes as completely different characters of the same name in the movie. Kirk, Spock and McCoy would be "biologically established" (i.e. born) before Nero's time travel mucked up things, so the movie should be valid for giving us further dirt on their age, parentage and so forth. Scotty, too. But Sulu and Uhura and Chekov would be subject to Nero-mucking, and none of them might share a birthdate with his or her TOS counterpart.

Timo Saloniemi
 
The difference in age(and therefore DNA) goes a long way toward explaining the vast difference in appearance, IRT NuChekov curly hair, Classic Chekov straight hair, etc.
 
Does anyone really believe that someone being born 4 years earlier would be the same character?

Who says he's the same Pavel Chekov?

He's got the same name, but he could easily be the product of a different sperm/egg combo. Nature being what it is, this one is certainly smarter than the TOS Pavel.

His parents gave their male child the name Pavel. If this one hadn't have come along, they would have given that name to the old one when he came along.

For instance: my name is Joseph, after my mother's Uncle Joseph who died as a child.

I was born in 1968. If my parents had had a male child in 1964 and not me, they would have named him Joseph.

Imagination.

Joe, thinking

I'm thinking along this lines, too. Maybe Prime Universe Chekov's mother was a crewmember aboard the Kelvin and was killed in the attack. Daddy Chekov therefore has a child in the NuTrek universe, but with a different mother, but he still names the child Pavel Chekov, after some relative. Certainly, that would explain this new Chekov's different age, appearance, and apparently advanced intelligence (this guy seems to be an absolute whiz compared to the old Chekov ... remember in Star Trek VI, when Chekov, who was a veteran security chief since The Motion Picture, needed Valaris, a recent academy graduate, to show him why you can't fire a phaser on kill on a starship - he didn't realize it sets off the alarms! Yikes, man ... I'd rather serve with New-Chekov any day !:lol:)
 
The destruction of the Kelvin changed Starfleet assignments and other events, so that Chekov's parents had a child four years earlier. They still named their son Pavel, but he's more like a brother to the original Pavel Chekov rather than an identical counterpart.

That helps explain the goofier voice....

"Goo-goo-goo-goo-goo! I ken dew dat! I ken dew dat!"
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top