• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Cheesiest set decor

There's an art to set dressing. The trick is to make sure the plant-on items aren't instantly recognizable as what they are. Had they simply glued a detail between the nubs for the reels on those cassette racks, for instance, that would've done it.
 
There was an episode of DS9, I think, where O'Brien takes a phaser out of a wall-mounted holder. The holder was a case I had designed for holding -IIRC- matchbook cars. One of Beverly Crusher's med-kits was actually a type of tape-casette holder I own and one of the more "famous" one is the impulse exhaust vent from an AMT model of a Klingon Battlecruiser used as the artery-repairing device McCoy uses on Chekov in TVH.
 
Hands down: the cassette tape holders on the Reliant bridge, and the Sparklets IDIC in Spock's cabin.

I agree about the cassette holders on the Reliant bridge, but the IDIC sparklet thing in Spock's quarters? No way, I want one of those! :D

(For the record, I'm watching TWOK right now)
 
the Sparklets IDIC in Spock's cabin.

My now-local shopping plaza/mall had a major renovation around the time of the early 80s and had shimmery Sparklets murals everywhere! Coincidentally, one of the stores in it used to sell light-up infinity mirrors, just like the one in Spock's quarters.

The plaza was renovated again a few years ago and the last of the Sparklets were removed. A sad day.

There's an art to set dressing. The trick is to make sure the plant-on items aren't instantly recognizable as what they are.

Or props like this?

http://therinofandor.blogspot.com/2007/10/hey-hoshi-translate-this-we-all-know.html
 
STIII had a lot of cheap sets. lol I think back to the nightclub scene as being a major example. It was a gaudy redress of the sickbay.

RAMA
 
STIII had a lot of cheap sets. lol I think back to the nightclub scene as being a major example. It was a gaudy redress of the sickbay.

RAMA

I think in Star Trek III Leonard Nimoy intentionally made things look a lot like TOS. The fight scene between Kirk and Kruge at the end for example, or the whole look of the planet and the rest of the set design. It always appeared to me like they wanted everything to look like a more expensive version of TOS (instead of a realistic look).
 
STIII had a lot of cheap sets.

Indeed.

In addition to the night club:

- The lame-ass Klingon Bird-of-Prey bridge set. Wow, I'm so scared.

- The abominable redress of the Enterprise bridge for the USS Grissom. PINK chairs? Seriously???

- The Genesis planet, complete with styrofoam precipice for Kruge to be cheesily kicked off of. Shame the sound stage fire didn't destroy the whole thing!

- Kirk's apartment. Actually, this was one of TWOK's better pieces of art direction, but what the hell is a BBC microcomputer doing in the 23rd Century? Oh, wait: Kirk collects antiques. I guess that that even extends to his 1980s tracksuit. Jim'll Fix It.

- The Excelsior bridge. OH. MY. ZEUS. Has there ever been a bigger piece of crud committed to celluloid, ever? Not even excluding Ed Wood films and Star Trek: Nemesis? How can you have a yellow alert in space dock? DUDE, GET A BETTER SHIP. Seriously.

On the plus side, STIII does have some wonderful cinematography. :)
 
^ One of my favorite scenes from III was the Enterprise entering Spacedock.
 
I'm surprised no one's cast a vote yet for TUC's "floppy bulkhead", during Scotty's 'Klingon Bitch' scene. *oy*

Cheers,
-CM-
 
Yes, because clearly pink is WEAK.

Idiocy.

EXACTLY.

My contention was, simply, that pink chairs clash badly with the colours of the bridge set. There was a snarky allusion to pink being a feminine colour, too, of course -- which makes the decision even more incongruous in the militarized universe of Harve Bennett and Nicholas Meyer -- but that was relatively benign, and more for humour's sake.

That the powers that be actually thought that the auspicious presence of a particular colour on a set conveys wimpiness is, well, troubling. I am not in the mood to whip out my TSFS DVD right now, but here is the wording, from the film's director, Leonard Nimoy, in the aforementioned commentary track:

the sense was that the Enterprise is the real thing, the rest of them are sort of...poor imitations. I think the whole idea was to make fun of this other, wonderful, advanced ship and put it in competition with the Enterprise, the grand old lady who is still tough and durable and feisty. The whole idea was to make this new ship effete and therefore ridiculous.
 
STIII had a lot of cheap sets.

Indeed.

In addition to the night club:

- The lame-ass Klingon Bird-of-Prey bridge set. Wow, I'm so scared.

- The abominable redress of the Enterprise bridge for the USS Grissom. PINK chairs? Seriously???

- The Genesis planet, complete with styrofoam precipice for Kruge to be cheesily kicked off of. Shame the sound stage fire didn't destroy the whole thing!
:lol:
Actually, now that you mention the fire, can we blame that for those cheapo Genesis planet scenes? Was there something better planned originally?
 
- The Genesis planet, complete with styrofoam precipice for Kruge to be cheesily kicked off of. Shame the sound stage fire didn't destroy the whole thing!

Now that was 100% TOS. Cheap looking set for a badly choreographed fight scene. Where's the problem with that?
 
I see at least two problems:

Star Trek III is not the original series.

Star Trek III is a feature film, and feature film audiences expect a feature film not to look like a 1960s TV show.
 
STIII had a lot of cheap sets.

Indeed.

In addition to the night club:

- The lame-ass Klingon Bird-of-Prey bridge set. Wow, I'm so scared.

- The abominable redress of the Enterprise bridge for the USS Grissom. PINK chairs? Seriously???

- The Genesis planet, complete with styrofoam precipice for Kruge to be cheesily kicked off of. Shame the sound stage fire didn't destroy the whole thing!
:lol:
Actually, now that you mention the fire, can we blame that for those cheapo Genesis planet scenes? Was there something better planned originally?

I don't think so. According to William Shatner, he singlehandedly rode in on a white unicorn and saved the day.

- The Genesis planet, complete with styrofoam precipice for Kruge to be cheesily kicked off of. Shame the sound stage fire didn't destroy the whole thing!

Now that was 100% TOS. Cheap looking set for a badly choreographed fight scene. Where's the problem with that?

:lol:

"GIVE ME GENESISSSS!"

I see at least two problems:

Star Trek III is not the original series.

Star Trek III is a feature film, and feature film audiences expect a feature film not to look like a 1960s TV show.

Do they? TWOK had worse photography, makeup, costuming and art direction than The Original Series, so the bar had already been set very low.
 
STIII had a lot of cheap sets.

Indeed.

In addition to the night club:

- The lame-ass Klingon Bird-of-Prey bridge set. Wow, I'm so scared.

- The abominable redress of the Enterprise bridge for the USS Grissom. PINK chairs? Seriously???

- The Genesis planet, complete with styrofoam precipice for Kruge to be cheesily kicked off of. Shame the sound stage fire didn't destroy the whole thing!
:lol:
Actually, now that you mention the fire, can we blame that for those cheapo Genesis planet scenes? Was there something better planned originally?

According to the first DVD special edition release of TSFS, the director of photography had wanted to film the Genesis sequences on location in Maui.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top