DOH! - Geez. My bad. Yeah, peters really seems to have issues.Scroll down a bit - this is the $7500 perk (no decimals) - the last one listed![]()
DOH! - Geez. My bad. Yeah, peters really seems to have issues.Scroll down a bit - this is the $7500 perk (no decimals) - the last one listed![]()
Next level down you can only use the bathrooms if you are nice. Yes, he really put that in a reward on the IGG
***
No, it's a photoshop.
Next level down you can only use the bathrooms if you are nice. Yes, he really put that in a reward on the IGG
DOH! - Geez. My bad. Yeah, peters really seems to have issues.
I think that's why so many people see it as a cult. They have this aura about them that just screams "you're either with us or against us, and if you're against us, you deserve nothing," even if you've donated.No worries - not surprising with the 75/7500 thing
In fairness to Peters or whoever wrote it, they closed with a joke which isn't a bad thing. It's just.... with this being a flexible goal, Team Axanar get the money whether that perk can be fulfilled or not. Which seems rather 'off' to me.
It's frustrating to me - not just for the scenario at present - but... I'm a good PR guy. I'd like to say a REALLY good PR guy and I know how to turn a business from this situation to a profitable one just by creating the right image and I know exactly how to turn this all around for them.
The solutions are simple enough, but I can't see it ever happening. There's a determination to say "We were right, this is awesome! Join us or be wrong!" and it's the complete opposite approach they should be taking if they want to survive.
That's odd. Did they specifically seem not to want to discuss Axanar, or do you think it was just the fact that you were focusing on a particular campaign?I had a representative from Indiegogo lined up to talk about crowd funding and honesty between merchandisers and donors in general, however when the subject arose that this was going to be about Axanar they stopped all communication and decided to not proceed with the interview.
Doesn't surprise me as my Ticket to Indegogo (and I know I'm not the only person to file one) reporting the Campaign for using Star Trek copyrighted elements (with links to specific stuff); I'm sure the LAST THING they (Indegogo) want is to go on the record about anything regarding this campaign. They KNOW what Alec Peters is doing in the Campaign is illegal - but as it's racked up $18K - and due to Indegogo rules - Indegogo will probably take 20%-30% in their fees (it'll be a lot higher because he won't make the $60K goal); they just want to get their Campaign fee and watch Alec Peters move on.I had a representative from Indiegogo lined up to talk about crowd funding and honesty between merchandisers and donors in general, however when the subject arose that this was going to be about Axanar they stopped all communication and decided to not proceed with the interview.
With that said, the podcast will still go ahead tomorrow and will be released on Saturday Australian time. From this podcast I will no longer be riding the fence on this subject.
I actually think you have done some informative programs. I suppose there are times when it's not about being on one side or the other as much as producing a show that brings the facts to the viewer.I had a representative from Indiegogo lined up to talk about crowd funding and honesty between merchandisers and donors in general, however when the subject arose that this was going to be about Axanar they stopped all communication and decided to not proceed with the interview.
With that said, the podcast will still go ahead tomorrow and will be released on Saturday Australian time. From this podcast I will no longer be riding the fence on this subject.
Big Giant LIKEI actually think you have done some informative programs. I suppose there are times when it's not about being on one side or the other as much as producing a show that brings the facts to the viewer.
As you are being clear on your position from the outset, I really can't see why that stance would be a problem.I had a representative from Indiegogo lined up to talk about crowd funding and honesty between merchandisers and donors in general, however when the subject arose that this was going to be about Axanar they stopped all communication and decided to not proceed with the interview.
With that said, the podcast will still go ahead tomorrow and will be released on Saturday Australian time. From this podcast I will no longer be riding the fence on this subject.
The actual Galileo is on exhibit in Texas. Its restoration was funded by a Trek fan and was performed at a ship refitter, with contributions from specialists for the interior and exterior doodads. The original had decayed to the point that the wood could not be salvaged, the 'restoration' is from just some of the metal frame. Alec had some involvement in helping raise funds, I think I read, but I don't believe he had a lot do do with the actual restoration.
http://www.space.com/22162-star-tre...w-it-was-restored-to-flight-status-video.html
http://www.space.com/20791-star-trek-galileo-shuttlecraft-photos.html
As I recall reading, there were two versions for the set, one at a scale for exterior shooting, and a taller partial set for interior shots.
This looks like a fan remake, maybe a playhouse. Notice for example no nacelles. Don't know the details but doing a tineye search on the image probably could find the source page and details.
I wish I had the money to indulge in that kind of passion...
That was you?! Oh, what excellent work. ♥I restored Galileo. Alec was involved for a short while but did not fund the purchase or the restoration.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.