Awwww, look how cute they are! They must be so proud!
![]()
I can't like this enough!Awwww, look how cute they are! They must be so proud!
![]()
Money.Although one does wonder why he doesn't just make a different science fiction movie.
Question: Could crowd funding be considered a prepayment? Axanar never made a film and charged a fee for it. Did Alex's salary and the studio violate fair use of the IP or a trust with the crowd funding?
Loeb and Loeb may have to pioneer some new territory here. If a donor donates $20 bucks what were the expectations, A studio was going to be built, Alex was going to have a personal salary or Were they expecting to see the coolest Star Trek epic ever?
Money.
If you saw two Kickstarter projects, one saying "We're doing a Star Trek fan-film" (or Star Wars or Harry Potter or whatever) and a second saying "We're doing a totally new sci-fi movie set in a universe of our own creation", which do you think is going to raise $250K faster???
The sarcasm is strong with you, my son. Go forth and proclaim among thy brethren.Just read a bit about the Axanar-proposed guidelines on the open Axanar facebook page. People are intrigued and enthused by the very fair and reasonable proposal that would see fan filmmakers licence their films to CBS/Paramount, allowing the latter to make a certain amount of use of the films. With reasonable restrictions, of course; CBS and Paramount can't just use the whole thing.
Very generous of them to allow CBS/Paramount a licence, I thought. Maybe CBS and Paramount will be allowed to make their own Star Trek movies and TV shows, if the fan film producers are okay with that.
True. Maybe paramount should just give him a job. Sure make your fan film. We sell it. Compromise. Ok that was meant as a joke, but that'd be a pretty good solution now that I think of it.
True. Maybe paramount should just give him a job. Sure make your fan film. We sell it. Compromise. Ok that was meant as a joke, but that'd be a pretty good solution now that I think of it.
Why would they hire him to make Star Trek? They can and have hired professionals to make Star Trek movies and tv shows. People who have a track record of getting things done and using other people's money well.
It was a joke. But what I'm saying could be an elegant solution, although it would never happen, as a settlement would be to let the dummy finish the film, and then just sign it over to paramount to do as they please with. Make a profit for themselves
Karzak is quite right about there being better people available to produce content then these guys. And arguably the best bits, or the most popular bits, were all produced by people no longer involved with Alec Peters. People like Christian Gossett and Tommy Kraft seem to no longer see eye to eye with Peters because Reasons.It was a joke. But what I'm saying could be an elegant solution, although it would never happen, as a settlement would be to let the dummy finish the film, and then just sign it over to paramount to do as they please with. Make a profit for themselves
It was a joke. But what I'm saying could be an elegant solution, although it would never happen, as a settlement would be to let the dummy finish the film, and then just sign it over to paramount to do as they please with. Make a profit for themselves
Why would CBS or Paramount want to effectively REWARD a person for stealing their IP and making an (at best) mediocre film? Do you think CBS or Paramount just grants Star Trek film/merchandise Licenses to anyone who comes calling? No, they have a vetting process and I don't think Alec Peters would:
A) Qualify
or
B) Be able to afford the licensing fee if he did.
I mean look at what actually happened: Alec Peters has touting 'Prelude to Axanar' as if HE DID EVERYTHING for it behind the scenes. Was he involved? Yep. But MOST of the cast/crew came aboard because of 'Prelude to Axanar's' director Christian Gossett; who LEFT soon after Prelude's completion due to issues he saw in the way Alec Peters was handling the pre-production for the Axanar feature film. And of course when someone's departure was outed - Alec Peters would suddenly bad mouth the production member/actor who bailed suddenly disclosing that THEY were somehow to blame and poor Alec was the victim of insane salary demands or that they were 'ungrateful' for the opportunity Alec provided them to work on his project, etc.
So sorry, but what you're suggesting is hardly an elegant solution. It's not that CBS/Paramount doesn't have experience with egomaniac producers/talent; but usually those people have to have a proven track record of success before a studio will begin to put up with their BS (say like Paramount bowing to JJ Abrams request that they make the Axanar lawsuit is 'go away'<--- Which if they do, it's because they think the Paramount/Bad Robot relationship will net them more profit compared to what they may loose in money and credibility in settling a lawsuit with a small time fan production like Axanar/Alec Peters - a case they were prevailing on given the most recent Judicial response to Defense motions.)
Allright allright it was a bad idea. Chill out
Awwww, look how cute they are! They must be so proud!
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.