Actually, I believe that you have protection the moment it's PUBLISHED or registered, not at creation.
For instance, if I wrote something, but never published it, never sought registration, and then I tell someone specifics about my story that they turn around and use, I've have nothing.
Also, there is some debate on whether it has to be registered. It's like with trademarks ... registration is VERY helpful, because it makes determining when you "published" that mark a lot easier in court. However, there are implied copyrights, like what we use on 1701News for instance. We don't register ... all we have to do is show that we published first. Once we publish, there is an implied copyright for that material, which helps by the fact that we state we own our copyright on material.
Implied copyright is harder to defend, but it does exist.
That's the Star Trek I've always wanted! Where can I buy the coffee?Axawhat?
That's the Star Trek I've always wanted! Where can I buy the coffee?
Neil
I found this link that should clear things up for both of us. A person can infringe on an unregistered copyright, but the holder of the copyright cannot sue in federal court (where most copyright disputes go) until the copyright is registered with the federal government. The thing is, you can register the copyright after the alleged infringement happened, then sue for infringement. You just won't get statutory damages.
Link:
http://www.newmediarights.org/busin...fringement_if_your_work_not_federally_registe
And I'm wrong about when the copyright exists. It begins with creation.![]()
Did "Horizons" cost $1.1 million? I bet not. And I actually sat through the whole trailer. I thought the bridge scenes were a little glowy (probably to cover up the green screen effect), but it seemed like a halfway interesting story as presented.
$22,000 was donated to Horizon.
Sorry - it's not a professional fan film, so it's shit.Did "Horizons" cost $1.1 million? I bet not. And I actually sat through the whole trailer. I thought the bridge scenes were a little glowy (probably to cover up the green screen effect), but it seemed like a halfway interesting story as presented.
Wow. Response, Axanar? lol
Wow. That looks great. I didn't see any recognizeable faces on screen, but it looks better than a lot of the stuff filled with Trek cast members and other known actors.Axawhat?
So, when is Axanar's next financial report due?
Indeed. I watched the trailer, and my reaction was "I want to see more of this!"Wow. That looks great. I didn't see any recognizeable faces on screen, but it looks better than a lot of the stuff filled with Trek cast members and other known actors.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.